Periprosthetic Postoperative Humeral Fractures After Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, George S Athwal
Author Information
  1. Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo: From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, (Sanchez-Sotelo), and the Roth/McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, London, Ontario, Canada (Athwal). ORCID

Abstract

The increased utilization of shoulder arthroplasty, including revision procedures, combined with rises in life expectancy, is expected to translate into a substantial increase in periprosthetic humeral fractures. The evaluation and management of these fractures needs to be updated to consider fractures that complicate anatomic and reverse arthroplasties and contemporary short-stem and stemless implants. Although conservative treatment is successful in a large proportion of these fractures, several surgical reconstructive techniques are required for the management of all fracture types. Surgical options include internal fixation, graft augmentation, standard revision procedures, and occasionally complex reconstructions including modular segmental prosthesis and allograft prosthetic composites. Most studies on the outcomes of periprosthetic humeral fractures have analyzed small samples and have typically reported on anatomic total shoulders with a standard-length humeral implant. Additional research is required to optimize the management of periprosthetic postoperative humeral fractures in the era of reverse arthroplasty, short stems, and stemless arthroplasty.

References

  1. Farley KX, Wilson JM, Kumar A, et al.: Prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States and the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. JB JS Open Access 2021;6:e20.00156.
  2. Fram B, Elder A, Namdari S: Periprosthetic humeral fractures in shoulder arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2019;7:e6.
  3. Singh JA, Sperling J, Schleck C, Harmsen W, Cofield R: Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement: A thirty-three-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1777-1785.
  4. Kumar S, Sperling JW, Haidukewych GH, Cofield RH: Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:680-689.
  5. Worland RL, Kim DY, Arredondo J: Periprosthetic humeral fractures: Management and classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:590-594.
  6. Cameron B, Iannotti JP: Periprosthetic fractures of the humerus and scapula: Management and prevention. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:305-318.
  7. Campbell JT, Moore RS, Iannotti JP, Norris TR, Williams GR: Periprosthetic humeral fractures: Mechanisms of fracture and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998;7:406-413.
  8. Wright TW, Cofield RH: Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1340-1346.
  9. Sanchez-Sotelo J: Current concepts in humeral component design for anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2021;10:5151.
  10. Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC: Periprosthetic fractures: Epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(suppl 2):S66-S70.
  11. Andersen JR, Williams CD, Cain R, Mighell M, Frankle M: Surgically treated humeral shaft fractures following shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:9-18.
  12. García-Fernández C, Lópiz-Morales Y, Rodríguez A, López-Durán L, Martínez FM: Periprosthetic humeral fractures associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Incidence and management. Int Orthop 2015;39:1965-1969.
  13. Ragusa PS, Vadhera A, Jang JM, Ali I, McFarland EG, Srikumaran U: Nonoperative treatment of periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2020;43:e553-e560.
  14. Atoun E, Van Tongel A, Hous N, et al.: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem. Int Orthop 2014;38:1213-1218.
  15. Groh GI, Heckman MM, Wirth MA, Curtis RJ, Rockwood CA Jr: Treatment of fractures adjacent to humeral prostheses. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:85-89.
  16. Kirchhoff C, Beirer M, Brunner U, Buchholz A, Biberthaler P, Crönlein M: Validation of a new classification for periprosthetic shoulder fractures. Int Orthop 2018;42:1371-1377.
  17. Duncan CP, Haddad FS: The unified classification system (UCS): Improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 2014;96-b:713-716.
  18. Kurowicki J, Momoh E, Levy JC: Treatment of periprosthetic humerus fractures with open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30:e369-e374.
  19. Saltzman BM, Leroux T, Collins MJ, Arns TA, Forsythe B: Short stem reverse total shoulder arthroplasty periprosthetic type A fracture. Orthopedics 2017;40:e721-e724.
  20. Schoch B, Mehta S, Namdari S: Surgical fixation of periprosthetic humerus fractures using an extension plate: Surgical technique and report of 5 cases. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31:e432-e435.
  21. Rollo G, Biserni M, Huri G, et al.: Strut graft vs. traditional plating in the management of periprosthetic humeral fractures: A multicentric cohort study. Med Glas (Zenica) 2020;17:490-497.

MeSH Term

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder
Humans
Humeral Fractures
Humerus
Periprosthetic Fractures
Reoperation
Shoulder Fractures
Shoulder Joint
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fractureshumeralarthroplastyperiprostheticmanagementincludingrevisionproceduresanatomicreversestemlessrequiredincreasedutilizationshouldercombinedriseslifeexpectancyexpectedtranslatesubstantialincreaseevaluationneedsupdatedconsidercomplicatearthroplastiescontemporaryshort-stemimplantsAlthoughconservativetreatmentsuccessfullargeproportionseveralsurgicalreconstructivetechniquesfracturetypesSurgicaloptionsincludeinternalfixationgraftaugmentationstandardoccasionallycomplexreconstructionsmodularsegmentalprosthesisallograftprostheticcompositesstudiesoutcomesanalyzedsmallsamplestypicallyreportedtotalshouldersstandard-lengthimplantAdditionalresearchoptimizepostoperativeerashortstemsPeriprostheticPostoperativeHumeralFracturesShoulderArthroplasty

Similar Articles

Cited By