Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room.

Kotaro Kunitomo, Taku Harada, Takashi Watari
Author Information
  1. Kotaro Kunitomo: Department of General Medicine, Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
  2. Taku Harada: Department of General Medicine, Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Takashi Watari: General Medicine Center, Shimane University, 89-1, Enya-cho, Izumo shi, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan. wataritari@gmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors constitute an important medical safety problem that needs improvement, and their frequency and severity are high in emergency room settings. Previous studies have suggested that diagnostic errors occur in 0.6-12% of first-time patients in the emergency room and that one or more cognitive factors are involved in 96% of these cases. This study aimed to identify the types of cognitive biases experienced by physicians in emergency rooms in Japan.
METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey using Nikkei Medical Online (Internet) from January 21 to January 31, 2019. Of the 159,519 physicians registered with Nikkei Medical Online when the survey was administered, those who volunteered their most memorable diagnostic error cases in the emergency room participated in the study. EZR was used for the statistical analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 387 physicians were included. The most common cognitive biases were overconfidence (22.5%), confirmation (21.2%), availability (12.4%), and anchoring (11.4%). Of the error cases, the top five most common initial diagnoses were upper gastrointestinal disease (22.7%), trauma (14.7%), cardiovascular disease (10.9%), respiratory disease (7.5%), and primary headache (6.5%). The corresponding final diagnoses for these errors were intestinal obstruction or peritonitis (27.3%), overlooked traumas (47.4%), other cardiovascular diseases (66.7%), cardiovascular disease (41.4%), and stroke (80%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of the initial and final diagnoses of cases with diagnostic errors shows that there were more cases with diagnostic errors caused by overlooking another disease in the same organ or a disease in a closely related organ.

Keywords

References

  1. Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):775-80 [PMID: 12915363]
  2. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jun;160(6):1105-1113 [PMID: 29675720]
  3. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;64(6):575-85 [PMID: 24882662]
  4. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019 Dec;18(12):431-433 [PMID: 31834172]
  5. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 May 14;8(1):67-84 [PMID: 32412440]
  6. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Feb;8(2):125-30 [PMID: 11157287]
  7. J Accid Emerg Med. 1995 Dec;12(4):251-4 [PMID: 8775950]
  8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):655-663 [PMID: 29317463]
  9. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jun 30;: [PMID: 34187115]
  10. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Sep;48(3):225-232 [PMID: 30191910]
  11. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2:ii58-ii64 [PMID: 23882089]
  12. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Nov 26;6(4):325-334 [PMID: 31116702]
  13. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;14(8):743-9 [PMID: 17538077]
  14. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 02;21(6):125-131 [PMID: 33207157]
  15. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 11;165(13):1493-9 [PMID: 16009864]
  16. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0237145 [PMID: 32745150]
  17. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):656-63 [PMID: 23584208]
  18. Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Oct;32(5):852-855 [PMID: 32902161]
  19. AEM Educ Train. 2017 Jan 19;1(1):41-42 [PMID: 30051007]
  20. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8 [PMID: 23208313]
  21. Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1022-8 [PMID: 19638766]
  22. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Sep 25;5(3):135-142 [PMID: 30016277]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8): [PMID: 35457511]
  24. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jul;150(1):167-8 [PMID: 26126464]
  25. Am J Med. 2008 May;121(5 Suppl):S2-23 [PMID: 18440350]
  26. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;49(2):196-205 [PMID: 16997424]
  27. J Gen Fam Med. 2021 Jan 04;22(2):96-99 [PMID: 33717785]
  28. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 6;342(1):29-36 [PMID: 10620647]
  29. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 May 8;27(1):54 [PMID: 31068188]
  30. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):683-687 [PMID: 28601266]
  31. MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Oct 23;13:10646 [PMID: 30800847]
  32. J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):168-172 [PMID: 31126674]
  33. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;9(11):1184-204 [PMID: 12414468]
  34. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Aug;38(2):146-51 [PMID: 11468609]
  35. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Aug;103(8):1650-1656 [PMID: 32169322]
  36. Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Oct;28(5):544-50 [PMID: 27476648]
  37. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):90-4 [PMID: 16365325]

MeSH Term

Bias
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cognition
Diagnostic Errors
Emergency Service, Hospital
Humans
Physicians

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diseaseerrorsemergencycasesroomdiagnosticbiasesphysiciansMedicalerror4%cognitive5%diagnoses7%cardiovascularDiagnosticsafetystudysurveyNikkeiOnlineJanuary21common22initialfinalorganCognitiveBACKGROUND:constituteimportantmedicalproblemneedsimprovementfrequencyseverityhighsettingsPreviousstudiessuggestedoccur06-12%first-timepatientsonefactorsinvolved96%aimedidentifytypesexperiencedroomsJapanMETHODS:conductedquestionnaireusingInternet312019159519registeredadministeredvolunteeredmemorableparticipatedEZRusedstatisticalanalysesRESULTS:total387includedoverconfidenceconfirmation2%availability12anchoring11topfiveuppergastrointestinaltrauma14109%respiratory7primaryheadache6correspondingintestinalobstructionperitonitis273%overlookedtraumas47diseases6641stroke80%respectivelyCONCLUSIONS:comparisonshowscausedoverlookinganothercloselyrelatedencountered

Similar Articles

Cited By