Frontal alpha asymmetry interaction with an experimental story EEG brain-computer interface.

Claudia Krogmeier, Brandon S Coventry, Christos Mousas
Author Information
  1. Claudia Krogmeier: Department of Computer Graphics Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
  2. Brandon S Coventry: Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
  3. Christos Mousas: Department of Computer Graphics Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.

Abstract

Although interest in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) from researchers and consumers continues to increase, many BCIs lack the complexity and imaginative properties thought to guide users toward successful brain activity modulation. We investigate the possibility of using a complex BCI by developing an experimental story environment with which users interact through cognitive thought strategies. In our system, the user's frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) measured with electroencephalography (EEG) is linearly mapped to the color saturation of the main character in the story. We implemented a user-friendly experimental design using a comfortable EEG device and short neurofeedback (NF) training protocol. In our system, seven out of 19 participants successfully increased FAA during the course of the study, for a total of ten successful blocks out of 152. We detail our results concerning left and right prefrontal cortical activity contributions to FAA in both successful and unsuccessful story blocks. Additionally, we examine inter-subject correlations of EEG data, and self-reported questionnaire data to understand the user experience of BCI interaction. Results suggest the potential of imaginative story BCI environments for engaging users and allowing for FAA modulation. Our data suggests new research directions for BCIs investigating emotion and motivation through FAA.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Neurosci. 2018 Apr 03;12:191 [PMID: 29666566]
  2. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2016 Sep;41(3):251-61 [PMID: 26782083]
  3. Behav Res Ther. 2017 May;92:32-40 [PMID: 28236680]
  4. Brain Connect. 2020 Aug;10(6):302-315 [PMID: 32458692]
  5. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27:102331 [PMID: 32623140]
  6. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;11:51 [PMID: 28275344]
  7. Neurosci Lett. 2010 Aug 16;480(2):112-6 [PMID: 20542087]
  8. Neuroscience. 2018 May 15;378:189-197 [PMID: 28642166]
  9. Eat Disord. 2016 Jul-Sep;24(4):354-74 [PMID: 27027700]
  10. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Jul;93(1):116-20 [PMID: 23773999]
  11. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 27;8:348 [PMID: 24904384]
  12. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jul 31;11:396 [PMID: 28824400]
  13. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1995 Sep;20(3):241-58 [PMID: 7495918]
  14. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):86-100 [PMID: 28003656]
  15. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 4;7(1):4578 [PMID: 28676688]
  16. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Jan;111:98-114 [PMID: 27865882]
  17. Psychophysiology. 2018 Jan;55(1): [PMID: 28459501]
  18. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 25;15:578875 [PMID: 33716680]
  19. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):44-51 [PMID: 21264651]
  20. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 23;12:402 [PMID: 30405374]
  21. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Sep;119:19-30 [PMID: 28288803]
  22. Biol Psychol. 2004 Oct;67(1-2):183-218 [PMID: 15130531]
  23. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Sep;25(5):371-386 [PMID: 32873177]
  24. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 16;6:112 [PMID: 22623915]
  25. Front Neuroinform. 2017 Jan 31;11:6 [PMID: 28197092]
  26. Front Comput Neurosci. 2016 Jul 12;10:70 [PMID: 27462216]
  27. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Jan;11(1):33-43 [PMID: 26163671]
  28. Front Neurosci. 2020 Dec 18;14:601402 [PMID: 33390885]
  29. Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 1;28(2):326-41 [PMID: 16084117]
  30. J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21 [PMID: 15102499]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0storyFAAEEGbrain-computerBCIsuserssuccessfulBCIexperimentalalphaasymmetrydatainterfacesimaginativethoughtactivitymodulationusingsystemfrontalelectroencephalographyneurofeedbackblocksinter-subjectcorrelationsinteractionAlthoughinterestresearchersconsumerscontinuesincreasemanylackcomplexitypropertiesguidetowardbraininvestigatepossibilitycomplexdevelopingenvironmentinteractcognitivestrategiesuser'smeasuredlinearlymappedcolorsaturationmaincharacterimplementeduser-friendlydesigncomfortabledeviceshortNFtrainingprotocolseven19participantssuccessfullyincreasedcoursestudytotalten152detailresultsconcerningleftrightprefrontalcorticalcontributionsunsuccessfulAdditionallyexamineself-reportedquestionnaireunderstanduserexperienceResultssuggestpotentialenvironmentsengagingallowingsuggestsnewresearchdirectionsinvestigatingemotionmotivationFrontalinterfaceaffectivecomputingavant-garde

Similar Articles

Cited By