BACKGROUND: The demand for quality maternal and child health (MCH) data is critical for tracking progress towards attainment of the Sustainable Development Goal 3. However, MCH cannot be adequately monitored where health data are inaccurate, incomplete, untimely, or inconsistent. Thus, this study assessed the level of MCH data quality.
METHOD: A facility-based cross-sectional study design was adopted, including a review of MCH service records. It was a stand-alone study involving 13 healthcare facilities of different levels that provided MCH services in the Cape Coast Metropolis. Data quality was assessed using the dimensions of accuracy, timeliness, completeness, and consistency. Health facilities registers were counted, collated, and compared with data on aggregate monthly forms, and a web-based data collation and reporting system, District Health Information System (DHIS2). The aggregate monthly forms were also compared with data in the DHIS2. Eight MCH variables were selected to assess data accuracy and consistency and two monthly reports were used to assess completeness and timeliness. Percentages and verification factor were estimated in the SPSS version 22 package.
RESULTS: Data accuracy were recorded between the data sources: Registers and Forms, 102.1% (95% CI = 97.5%-106.7%); Registers and DHIS2, 102.4% (95% CI = 94.4%-110.4%); and Forms and DHIS2, 100.1% (95% CI = 96.4%-103.9%). Across the eight MCH variables, data were 93.2% (95% CI = 82.9%-103.5%) complete in Registers, 91.0% (95% CI = 79.5%-102.5%) in the Forms, and 94.9% (95% CI = 89.9%-99.9%) in DHIS2 database. On the average, 87.2% (95% CI = 80.5%-93.9%) of the facilities submitted their Monthly Midwife's Returns reports on time, and Monthly Vaccination Report was 94% (95% CI = 89.3%-97.3%). The overall average data consistency was 93% (95% CI = 84%-102%).
CONCLUSION: Given the WHO standard for data quality, the level of MCH data quality in the health care facilities at the Cape Coast Metropolis, available through the DHIS2 is complete, reported on timely manner, consistent, and reflect accurately what exist in facility's source document. Although there is evidence that data quality is good, there is still room for improvement in the quality of the data.
