Bladder perforation injury after percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheterization: A case report.

Chun-Xia Shi, Zhong-Xin Li, Hai-Tao Sun, Wu-Qing Sun, Yu Ji, Shu-Jing Jia
Author Information
  1. Chun-Xia Shi: Department of Nephrology, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China.
  2. Zhong-Xin Li: Department of Nephrology, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China. lhyy6806@ccmu.edu.cn.
  3. Hai-Tao Sun: Department of General Surgery, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China.
  4. Wu-Qing Sun: Department of General Surgery, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China.
  5. Yu Ji: Department of General Surgery, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China.
  6. Shu-Jing Jia: Department of Medicine, Beijing Shuangqiao Hospital, Beijing 100121, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insertion of a catheter into the bladder is a rare complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), and is mainly related to surgical injury. This paper reports a case of bladder perforation that was caused by percutaneous PD catheterization.
CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old man underwent percutaneous PD catheterization for end-stage renal disease. On the second day after the operation, urgent urination and gross hematuria occurred. Urinalysis showed the presence of red and white blood cells. Empirical anti-infective treatment was given. On the third day after the operation, urgent urination occurred during PD perfusion. Ultrasound showed that the PD catheter was located in the bladder, and subsequent computed tomography (CT) showed that the PD catheter moved through the anterior wall into the bladder. The PD catheter was withdrawn from the bladder and catheterization was retained. Repeat CT on the fourth day after the operation showed that the PD catheter was removed from the bladder, but there was poor catheter function. The PD catheter was removed and the patient was changed to hemodialysis. CT cystography showed that the bladder healed well and the patient was discharged 14 d after the operation.
CONCLUSION: Bladder perforation injury should be considered and treated timeously in case of bladder irritation during and after percutaneous PD catheterization. The use of Doppler ultrasound and other related technologies may reduce the incidence of such complications.

Keywords

References

  1. World J Clin Cases. 2021 Aug 6;9(22):6510-6514 [PMID: 34435019]
  2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Aug;68(2):312-315 [PMID: 26857647]
  3. Semin Nephrol. 2017 Jan;37(1):17-29 [PMID: 28153191]
  4. World J Clin Cases. 2020 Oct 26;8(20):4993-4998 [PMID: 33195672]
  5. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov;27(11):3238-3252 [PMID: 27339663]
  6. J Pediatr Surg. 2016 May;51(5):730-3 [PMID: 26936290]
  7. BJU Int. 2021 Nov;128(5):539-547 [PMID: 33835614]
  8. Perit Dial Int. 2019 Sep-Oct;39(5):414-436 [PMID: 31028108]
  9. J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):30-35 [PMID: 33053308]
  10. Semin Dial. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(6):680-6 [PMID: 26138688]
  11. Am Surg. 2013 Jun;79(6):589-93 [PMID: 23711268]
  12. Semin Dial. 2020 Mar;33(2):133-139 [PMID: 32160357]
  13. Perit Dial Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):382-6 [PMID: 26493754]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PDcatheterbladderdialysiscatheterizationshowedperforationpercutaneousoperationperitonealinjurycasedayCTBladderrelatedurgenturinationoccurredremovedpatientreportPeritonealBACKGROUND:InsertionrarecomplicationmainlysurgicalpaperreportscausedCASESUMMARY:64-year-oldmanunderwentend-stagerenaldiseasesecondgrosshematuriaUrinalysispresenceredwhitebloodcellsEmpiricalanti-infectivetreatmentgiventhirdperfusionUltrasoundlocatedsubsequentcomputedtomographymovedanteriorwallwithdrawnretainedRepeatfourthpoorfunctionchangedhemodialysiscystographyhealedwelldischarged14dCONCLUSION:consideredtreatedtimeouslyirritationuseDopplerultrasoundtechnologiesmayreduceincidencecomplicationscatheterization:CasePercutaneousdysfunction

Similar Articles

Cited By