Synergistic Effect of Increased Total Protein Intake and Strength Training on Muscle Strength: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Ryoichi Tagawa, Daiki Watanabe, Kyoko Ito, Takeru Otsuyama, Kyosuke Nakayama, Chiaki Sanbongi, Motohiko Miyachi
Author Information
  1. Ryoichi Tagawa: Nutrition and Food Function Research Department, Food Microbiology and Function Research Laboratories, R&D Division, Meiji Co., Ltd., 1-29-1 Nanakuni, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0919, Japan.
  2. Daiki Watanabe: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa-city, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan. ORCID
  3. Kyoko Ito: Nutrition and Food Function Research Department, Food Microbiology and Function Research Laboratories, R&D Division, Meiji Co., Ltd., 1-29-1 Nanakuni, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0919, Japan.
  4. Takeru Otsuyama: Nutrition and Food Function Research Department, Food Microbiology and Function Research Laboratories, R&D Division, Meiji Co., Ltd., 1-29-1 Nanakuni, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0919, Japan.
  5. Kyosuke Nakayama: Nutrition and Food Function Research Department, Food Microbiology and Function Research Laboratories, R&D Division, Meiji Co., Ltd., 1-29-1 Nanakuni, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0919, Japan.
  6. Chiaki Sanbongi: Nutrition and Food Function Research Department, Food Microbiology and Function Research Laboratories, R&D Division, Meiji Co., Ltd., 1-29-1 Nanakuni, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0919, Japan.
  7. Motohiko Miyachi: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa-city, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan. cardiovascular0327@mac.com. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protein supplementation augments muscle strength gain during resistance training. Although some studies focus on the dose-response relationship of total protein intake to muscle mass or strength, the detailed dose-response relationship between total protein intake and muscle strength increase is yet to be clarified, especially in the absence of resistance training.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the detailed dose-response relationship between protein supplementation and muscle strength, with and without resistance training.
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Ichushi-Web (last accessed on March 23, 2022).
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of protein intake on muscle strength.
SYNTHESIS METHODS: A random-effects model and a spline model.
RESULTS: A total of 82 articles were obtained for meta-analyses, and data from 69 articles were used to create spline curves. Muscle strength increase was significantly augmented only with resistance training (MD 2.01%, 95% CI 1.09-2.93) and was not augmented if resistance training was absent (MD 0.13%, 95% CI - 1.53 to 1.79). In the dose-response analysis using a spline model, muscle strength increase with resistance training showed a dose-dependent positive association with total protein intake, which is 0.72% (95% CI 0.40-1.04%) increase in muscle strength per 0.1 g/kg body weight [BW]/d increase in total protein intake up to 1.5 g/kg BW/d, but no further gains were observed thereafter.
CONCLUSION: Concurrent use of resistance training is essential for protein supplementation to improve muscle strength. This study indicates that 1.5 g/kg BW/d may be the most appropriate amount of total protein intake for maintaining and augmenting muscle strength along with resistance training.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutrients. 2020 Aug 27;12(9): [PMID: 32867103]
  2. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Nov;45(11):1185-1196 [PMID: 32598857]
  3. Psychosom Med. 2020 Jan;82(1):39-46 [PMID: 31702599]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;18(9): [PMID: 33946502]
  5. BMC Geriatr. 2013 Jul 16;13:74 [PMID: 23865675]
  6. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):958.e1-9 [PMID: 25444576]
  7. Amino Acids. 2016 Feb;48(2):321-36 [PMID: 26476924]
  8. J Aging Phys Act. 2008 Oct;16(4):484-93 [PMID: 19033607]
  9. J Sport Health Sci. 2021 May;10(3):290-295 [PMID: 32565244]
  10. Pediatrics. 1980 Apr;65(4):683-97 [PMID: 6988785]
  11. Sports Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):627-41 [PMID: 23568373]
  12. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 May;106(5):1720-9 [PMID: 19299575]
  13. Sports (Basel). 2018 Sep 29;6(4): [PMID: 30274252]
  14. Adv Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;10(1):59-69 [PMID: 30624580]
  15. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2004 Jun;4(2):165-74 [PMID: 15615119]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD000032 [PMID: 22972038]
  17. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(5):451-458 [PMID: 31021362]
  18. Sports Med. 2018 Jul;48(7):1661-1671 [PMID: 29626334]
  19. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  20. Eur J Transl Myol. 2020 Sep 09;30(3):9311 [PMID: 33117512]
  21. Sports Med. 2020 Jun;50(6):1163-1190 [PMID: 32060751]
  22. Behav Modif. 2017 Mar;41(2):323-339 [PMID: 27760807]
  23. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Feb;11(1):3-25 [PMID: 31788969]
  24. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018 Feb 1;10(2): [PMID: 29419405]
  25. Acta Physiol Scand. 1975 Jul;94(3):313-8 [PMID: 170792]
  26. Sports Med. 2020 Nov;50(11):1901-1928 [PMID: 32757164]
  27. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Mar;121(3):675-685 [PMID: 33355714]
  28. Nutr Rev. 2021 Jan 9;79(2):121-147 [PMID: 32483625]
  29. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2012 Sep 14;9(1):83 [PMID: 22974011]
  30. J Nutr. 2018 Nov 1;148(11):1760-1775 [PMID: 30383278]
  31. Sports Med. 2016 Mar;46(3):401-19 [PMID: 26589515]
  32. J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 12;10(12): [PMID: 34204622]
  33. JAMA. 2012 Jan 4;307(1):47-55 [PMID: 22215165]
  34. Sports Med. 2007;37(2):145-68 [PMID: 17241104]
  35. Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1693-720 [PMID: 26420238]
  36. PeerJ. 2020 May 22;8:e9137 [PMID: 32509455]
  37. Acta Physiol Scand. 1976 Mar;96(3):392-8 [PMID: 179278]
  38. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Jul - Aug;89:104109 [PMID: 32460125]
  39. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):781-95 [PMID: 26851290]
  40. Front Physiol. 2019 Oct 16;10:1301 [PMID: 31681011]
  41. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Mar 18;138(6):460-7 [PMID: 12639078]
  42. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014 Feb;14 Suppl 1:76-84 [PMID: 24450564]
  43. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 May;56(5):B209-17 [PMID: 11320101]
  44. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Apr;13(2):795-810 [PMID: 35187864]
  45. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Nov 1;108(5):1043-1059 [PMID: 30475963]
  46. Nutr Rev. 2020 Nov 04;: [PMID: 33300582]
  47. Exp Aging Res. 2020 Mar-Apr;46(2):178-191 [PMID: 31928183]
  48. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Apr;114(4):735-42 [PMID: 24384983]
  49. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e026560 [PMID: 31924626]
  50. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1579-85 [PMID: 19864405]
  51. BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2031 [PMID: 32611588]
  52. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928 [PMID: 22008217]
  53. Skelet Muscle. 2022 Feb 7;12(1):4 [PMID: 35130970]
  54. Adv Nutr. 2018 Jul 1;9(4):404-418 [PMID: 30032227]
  55. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56 [PMID: 11253156]
  56. Nutr Res. 2019 Dec;72:1-17 [PMID: 31672317]
  57. Nutrients. 2015 Aug 26;7(9):7126-42 [PMID: 26343709]
  58. Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1671-92 [PMID: 26412212]
  59. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Apr 6;113(4):790-800 [PMID: 33564844]
  60. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;18(3): [PMID: 33499423]
  61. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):619-22 [PMID: 25931693]
  62. Sports Med. 2014 Dec;44(12):1693-702 [PMID: 25059334]
  63. Q J Exp Physiol. 1989 May;74(3):233-56 [PMID: 2664854]
  64. Cesk Fysiol. 2008;57(1):10-4 [PMID: 18630139]
  65. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Apr 18;:1-20 [PMID: 33870831]
  66. Food Funct. 2019 May 22;10(5):2766-2773 [PMID: 31041966]
  67. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;96(6):1454-64 [PMID: 23134885]
  68. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988 Oct;20(5 Suppl):S135-45 [PMID: 3057313]
  69. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(11):1287-1295 [PMID: 29327605]
  70. Sports Med. 2020 Nov;50(11):1983-1999 [PMID: 32740889]
  71. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 May 29;19(2):727-734 [PMID: 33520799]
  72. Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 04;9:1733 [PMID: 30564141]
  73. Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):5-18 [PMID: 28058794]
  74. Nutrients. 2019 Dec 03;11(12): [PMID: 31817048]
  75. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;52(6):376-384 [PMID: 28698222]
  76. Diabetologia. 2019 Jul;62(7):1129-1142 [PMID: 31011778]
  77. J Gerontol. 1990 May;45(3):M82-8 [PMID: 2335723]
  78. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94 [PMID: 21195583]
  79. Sports Med. 2016 Oct;46(10):1419-49 [PMID: 26838985]
  80. Exp Gerontol. 2019 Apr;118:65-71 [PMID: 30641106]

Grants

  1. 22ek0210166s0801/Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0strengthmuscletrainingresistanceproteintotalintakeincreasedose-responserelationship10ProteinsupplementationmodelsplineMuscle95%CIdetailedRandomizedarticlesaugmentedMD5 g/kgBW/dBACKGROUND:augmentsgainAlthoughstudiesfocusmassyetclarifiedespeciallyabsenceOBJECTIVE:aimedassesswithoutDESIGN:Systematicreviewmeta-analysisDATASOURCES:PubMedIchushi-WeblastaccessedMarch232022ELIGIBILITYCRITERIA:controlledtrialsinvestigatingeffectsSYNTHESISMETHODS:random-effectsRESULTS:82obtainedmeta-analysesdata69usedcreatecurvessignificantly201%09-293absent13%- 15379analysisusingshoweddose-dependentpositiveassociation72%40-104%per1 g/kgbodyweight[BW]/dgainsobservedthereafterCONCLUSION:ConcurrentuseessentialimprovestudyindicatesmayappropriateamountmaintainingaugmentingalongSynergisticEffectIncreasedTotalIntakeStrengthTrainingStrength:Dose-ResponseMeta-analysisControlledTrialsDose-responseResistanceSplinecurve

Similar Articles

Cited By