The evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samples.

Marcela Krutova, Marie Brajerova, Zdenek Kepka, Ales Briksi, Petr Hubacek, Pavel Drevinek
Author Information
  1. Marcela Krutova: Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. ORCID
  2. Marie Brajerova: Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  3. Zdenek Kepka: Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  4. Ales Briksi: Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  5. Petr Hubacek: Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  6. Pavel Drevinek: Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid diagnostics tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen vary in their sensitivities, and moreover, genomic mutations may further affect the performance of the assays. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of an automated antigen assay and compare its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant positive clinical samples.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analytical performance of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was evaluated on a population of community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic investigated by the RT-qPCR Allplex��� SARS-CoV-2 assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were evaluated on prospective 621 nasopharyngeal swabs along with oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity regarding variants determined by the Allplex��� SARS-CoV-2 Variant assays was analysed in additional, retrospective 158 Delta and 59 Omicron samples.
RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of the antigen test in prospective samples was 77.9% (113/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.3-84.4) with the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 98.8-100). Regarding the variant, the sensitivity was higher in Omicron-variant samples, 93.2% (55/59; 95% CI 83.5-98.1), compared to Delta-variant samples, 71.5% (113/158; 95% CI 63.8-78.4; p���=���.001).
CONCLUSION: In community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic, the automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test showed high sensitivity over 98.0% in subgroup samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25. Regarding the variant, the antigen test sensitivity was higher in the Omicron-variant samples compared to the Delta-variant samples. The analytical performance of the antigen test can differ between the SARS-CoV-2 variants, and a re-evaluation should be performed for new circulating lineages.

Keywords

References

  1. Trends Analyt Chem. 2021 Dec;145:116452 [PMID: 34629572]
  2. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2663-2666 [PMID: 32442256]
  3. Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(44): [PMID: 34738515]
  4. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2021 Summer;70(3):156-160 [PMID: 34641689]
  5. J Infect. 2022 Apr;84(4):e7-e9 [PMID: 35143815]
  6. J Med Virol. 2022 Apr;94(4):1707-1710 [PMID: 34825717]
  7. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022 Nov;16(6):1033-1039 [PMID: 36065770]
  8. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2489-2491 [PMID: 34941024]
  9. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;39(6):1059-1061 [PMID: 32342252]
  10. JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):529-531 [PMID: 33404586]
  11. Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20363 [PMID: 34645929]
  12. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2022 Feb;20(1):60-69 [PMID: 35033679]
  13. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;27(12):3137-3141 [PMID: 34708686]
  14. Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512 [PMID: 35120592]
  15. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Jul;19(7):409-424 [PMID: 34075212]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3:CD013705 [PMID: 33760236]

MeSH Term

COVID-19
Humans
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0antigenSARS-CoV-2sensitivitysamplestestperformanceautomatedOmicron-variant95%analyticalassaymariPOCCIcomparedassaysDelta-evaluatedcommunity-dwellingsubjectsmildrespiratorysymptomsasymptomaticRT-qPCRAllplex���specificityprospectiveswabsvariantsDeltaOmicron498RegardingvarianthigherDelta-variantBACKGROUND:rapiddiagnosticstestsvarysensitivitiesmoreovergenomicmutationsmayaffectaimedevaluatecomparepositiveclinicalMATERIALANDMETHODS:populationinvestigated621nasopharyngealalongoropharyngealregardingdeterminedVariantanalysedadditionalretrospective15859RESULTS:overall779%113/145confidenceinterval[CI]703-84998%8-100932%55/59835-981715%113/158638-78p���=���001CONCLUSION:showedhigh0%subgroupcyclethresholdCtvalues < 25candifferre-evaluationperformednewcirculatinglineagesevaluationcomparisontesting

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)