Semen Quality Following Long-term Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde in China.

Mo-Qi Lv, Hai-Xu Wang, Yan-Qi Yang, Rui-Fang Sun, Pan Ge, Jian Zhang, Wen-Bao Zhao, Shui-Ping Han, Dang-Xia Zhou
Author Information
  1. Mo-Qi Lv: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  2. Hai-Xu Wang: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
  3. Yan-Qi Yang: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  4. Rui-Fang Sun: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  5. Pan Ge: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  6. Jian Zhang: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  7. Wen-Bao Zhao: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  8. Shui-Ping Han: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  9. Dang-Xia Zhou: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical School, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Abstract

Importance: The potential effects of long-term occupational exposure to formaldehyde (FA) on human semen quality is not clear.
Objective: To assess whether long-term occupational exposure to FA is associated with semen quality.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study was conducted from June 1 to June 30, 2021, in Xi'an, China. Participants were adults aged 23 to 40 years who had lived in the study area for 24 months or longer. Data analysis was performed from September 1 to October 1, 2021.
Exposures: Long-term occupational exposure to FA was measured using a formaldehyde detector, and the FA exposure index (FEI) was calculated as follows: FEI = final concentration of FA (mg/m3) × work time during a workday (hour) × cumulative workdays (year).
Main Outcomes and Measures: Semen samples were collected by masturbation after 3 to 7 days of abstinence and were then assessed by the computer-automated semen analysis system, Baso-Papanicolaou staining, and sperm-chromatin structure assay.
Results: A total of 205 men (mean [SD] age, 29.49 [3.64] years), with 124 individuals in the FA exposure group (mean [SD] FEI, 73.72 [54.86]) and 81 age-matched controls, were included in the final analysis. Long-term personal occupational exposure to FA was significantly associated with poor semen quality. Specifically, a 1-unit increase in FEI was associated with a change of -0.99% (95% CI, -1.00% to -0.98%) in total sperm motility, -0.99% (95% CI, -0.99% to -0.97%) in progressive sperm motility, -0.05% (95% CI, -0.08% to -0.02%) in curvilinear velocity, -0.07% (95% CI, -0.10% to -0.04%) in straight line velocity, -0.07% (95% CI, -0.10% to -0.04%) in time-average velocity, -0.98% (95% CI, -0.99% to -0.93%) in normal sperm morphology, -0.24% (95% CI, -0.35% to -0.11%) in seminal neutral glucosidase, -0.61% (95% CI, -0.66% to -0.56%) in seminal plasma zinc, 0.52% (95% CI, 0.15% to 1.02%) in beat cross frequency, and 0.10% (95% CI, 0.06% to 0.14%) in the DNA fragmentation index. These associations remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors. Furthermore, subgroup analysis found that high levels of oxidative stress might promote the associations between FA exposure and semen quality.
Conclusions and Relevance: This study found an association between long-term occupational exposure to FA and semen quality. This deterioration was dose and time dependent and might be induced by oxidative stress.

References

  1. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Sep 18;19(1):146 [PMID: 34537068]
  2. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020 Dec;36(12):1127-1130 [PMID: 32608274]
  3. Heliyon. 2020 Aug 20;6(8):e04587 [PMID: 32904241]
  4. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2009 Jul;21(3):287-93 [PMID: 19443880]
  5. Afr Health Sci. 2017 Jun;17(2):418-427 [PMID: 29062337]
  6. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995 Jan;39(1):80-2 [PMID: 7705878]
  7. Fam Pract. 2009 Aug;26(4):269-74 [PMID: 19502575]
  8. Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 30;5:15874 [PMID: 26515386]
  9. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:2539127 [PMID: 26904140]
  10. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;10(9): [PMID: 34572997]
  11. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020 Apr 30;18(4):275-286 [PMID: 32494766]
  12. Environ Int. 2009 Nov;35(8):1210-24 [PMID: 19589601]
  13. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Nov;38(11):2965-2974 [PMID: 34554361]
  14. Urologia. 2021 Oct 07;:3915603211049888 [PMID: 34617487]
  15. Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun 18;36(7):1751-1775 [PMID: 34046659]
  16. Genet Mol Res. 2015 Sep 09;14(3):10816-26 [PMID: 26400310]
  17. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2006 Jul;37(4):566-9 [PMID: 16909603]
  18. Ann Anat. 2015 Nov;202:45-51 [PMID: 26342159]
  19. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 May 17;19(7):50 [PMID: 29774504]
  20. Andrologia. 2019 Oct;51(9):e13362 [PMID: 31321807]
  21. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 3;49(3):1537-44 [PMID: 25563933]
  22. J Occup Environ Med. 2012 May;54(5):518-24 [PMID: 22576458]
  23. Andrology. 2019 Nov;7(6):818-826 [PMID: 31115178]
  24. Andrologia. 2021 Dec;53(11):e14239 [PMID: 34520070]
  25. Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jul;11(4):1279-1304 [PMID: 27099345]
  26. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;6(4):250-67 [PMID: 24520448]
  27. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;54(4-5):169-76 [PMID: 18942024]
  28. Toxicol Ind Health. 2005 Nov;21(10):249-54 [PMID: 16463957]
  29. Environ Res. 2022 Mar;204(Pt B):112094 [PMID: 34563530]
  30. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4 [PMID: 24141714]
  31. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Sep;155:112409 [PMID: 34265366]
  32. Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13 Suppl 1:33-44 [PMID: 9663768]
  33. Methods Cell Sci. 2000;22(2-3):169-89 [PMID: 11264952]
  34. DNA Repair (Amst). 2021 Sep;105:103134 [PMID: 34116475]
  35. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):646-659 [PMID: 28981654]
  36. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2007 Aug;66(3):167-71 [PMID: 17985313]
  37. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):635-645 [PMID: 27113031]
  38. Mutat Res. 1984 Dec;130(6):417-24 [PMID: 6513969]
  39. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 24;57(9): [PMID: 34577786]
  40. Inhal Toxicol. 2021 Jan;33(1):8-17 [PMID: 33322957]
  41. Environ Toxicol. 2015 Mar;30(3):323-31 [PMID: 24142868]
  42. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jan;34(1):38-47 [PMID: 28029592]

MeSH Term

Adult
China
Cohort Studies
Formaldehyde
Humans
Male
Occupational Exposure
Respiratory Hypersensitivity
Semen
Semen Analysis
Sperm Motility

Chemicals

Formaldehyde

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0-095%CIFAexposuresemenoccupationalquality01analysis99%long-termassociatedstudyLong-termFEIspermvelocity10%formaldehydeJune2021ChinayearsindextimeSementotalmean[SD]98%motility02%07%04%seminalassociationsfoundoxidativestressmightImportance:potentialeffectshumanclearObjective:assesswhetherDesignSettingParticipants:population-basedcohortconducted30Xi'anParticipantsadultsaged2340livedarea24monthslongerDataperformedSeptemberOctoberExposures:measuredusingdetectorcalculatedfollows:FEI = finalconcentrationmg/m3 × workworkdayhour × cumulativeworkdaysyearMainOutcomesMeasures:samplescollectedmasturbation37daysabstinenceassessedcomputer-automatedsystemBaso-Papanicolaoustainingsperm-chromatinstructureassayResults:205menage2949[364]124individualsgroup7372[5486]81age-matchedcontrolsincludedfinalpersonalsignificantlypoorSpecifically1-unitincreasechange-100%97%progressive05%08%curvilinearstraightlinetime-average93%normalmorphology24%35%11%neutralglucosidase61%66%56%plasmazinc52%15%beatcrossfrequency06%14%DNAfragmentationremainedsignificantadjustingconfoundingfactorsFurthermoresubgrouphighlevelspromoteConclusionsRelevance:associationdeteriorationdosedependentinducedQualityFollowingOccupationalExposureFormaldehyde

Similar Articles

Cited By