Multiparametric Dual-Time-Point [F]FDG PET/MRI for Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Untreated FIGO I/II Cervical Carcinoma.

Matthias Weissinger, Stefan Kommoss, Johann Jacoby, Stephan Ursprung, Ferdinand Seith, Sascha Hoffmann, Konstantin Nikolaou, Sara Yvonne Brucker, Christian La Fougère, Helmut Dittmann
Author Information
  1. Matthias Weissinger: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID
  2. Stefan Kommoss: Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
  3. Johann Jacoby: Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID
  4. Stephan Ursprung: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID
  5. Ferdinand Seith: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID
  6. Sascha Hoffmann: Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID
  7. Konstantin Nikolaou: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID
  8. Sara Yvonne Brucker: Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID
  9. Christian La Fougère: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
  10. Helmut Dittmann: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

[F]FDG PET/MRI was shown to have limited sensitivity for N-staging in FIGO I/II Cervical Carcinoma. Therefore, this prospective study aimed to investigate the additional value of multiparametric dual-time-point PET/MRI and to assess potential influencing factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection. A total of 63 patients underwent whole-body dual-time-point [F]FDG PET/MRI 60 + 90 min p.i., and 251 LN were evaluated visually, quantified multiparametrically, and correlated with histology. Grading of the primary tumor (G2/G3) had a significant impact on visual detection (sens: 8.3%/31%). The best single parameter for LNM detection was SUVavg, however, with a significant loss of discriminatory power in G2 vs. G3 tumors (AUC: 0.673/0.901). The independent predictors SUVavg, ∆SUVpeak, LN sphericity, ADC, and histologic grade were included in the logistic-regression-based malignancy score (MS) for multiparametric analysis. Application of MS enhanced AUCs, especially in G2 tumors (AUC: G2:0.769; G3:0.877) and improved the accuracy for single LNM from 34.5% to 55.5% compared with the best univariate parameter SUVavg. Compared with visual analysis, the use of the malignancy score increased the overall sensitivity from 31.0% to 79.3% (Youden optimum) with a moderate decrease in specificity from 98.3% to 75.6%. These findings indicate that multiparametric evaluation of dual-time-point PET/MRI has the potential to improve accuracy compared with visual interpretation and enables sufficient N-staging also in G2 Cervical Carcinoma.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Aug;45(12):2103-9 [PMID: 19403303]
  2. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1984;23(6):455-9 [PMID: 6099039]
  3. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 May;28(4):788-793 [PMID: 29538254]
  4. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):93-99 [PMID: 31839343]
  5. Radiol Med. 2016 Jul;121(7):537-45 [PMID: 27033474]
  6. Oncology. 2017;92(4):213-220 [PMID: 28142146]
  7. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jun;97(3):727-32 [PMID: 15943983]
  8. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jan;45(1):67-76 [PMID: 28840302]
  9. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar;120(3):353-7 [PMID: 21215440]
  10. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1990 Jan;42(1):60-6 [PMID: 2299243]
  11. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000 Jul;10(4):305-312 [PMID: 11240691]
  12. Anticancer Res. 2015 Apr;35(4):2247-53 [PMID: 25862886]
  13. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):64-84 [PMID: 30659131]
  14. J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):1913-1918 [PMID: 28546331]
  15. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Dec;139(3):559-67 [PMID: 26416173]
  16. J Nucl Med. 2021 Aug 1;62(8):1062-1067 [PMID: 33509973]
  17. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203 [PMID: 31812369]
  18. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(2):413-22 [PMID: 22911367]
  19. J Nucl Med. 2016 Oct;57(10):1642-1649 [PMID: 27230933]
  20. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(9):1511-1519 [PMID: 28374119]
  21. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep;106(3):604-13 [PMID: 17628644]
  22. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;49(6):495-500 [PMID: 31070770]
  23. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135 [PMID: 30656645]
  24. South Med J. 1999 Feb;92(2):204-8 [PMID: 10071668]
  25. Theranostics. 2020 Feb 6;10(7):2944-2948 [PMID: 32194847]
  26. Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv262 [PMID: 29741577]
  27. J Nucl Med. 2003 Nov;44(11):1775-83 [PMID: 14602859]
  28. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(3):209-222 [PMID: 28183074]

Grants

  1. EXC 2180 - 390900677/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PET/MRImultiparametricdual-time-point[F]FDGcervicalcarcinomaLNMdetectionvisualSUVavgG2sensitivityN-stagingFIGOI/IIpotentiallymphnodeLNsignificantbestsingleparametertumorsAUC:malignancyscoreMSanalysisaccuracy5%compared3%shownlimitedThereforeprospectivestudyaimedinvestigateadditionalvalueassessinfluencingfactorsmetastasistotal63patientsunderwentwhole-body60+90minpi251evaluatedvisuallyquantifiedmultiparametricallycorrelatedhistologyGradingprimarytumorG2/G3impactsens:83%/31%howeverlossdiscriminatorypowervsG30673/0901independentpredictors∆SUVpeaksphericityADChistologicgradeincludedlogistic-regression-basedApplicationenhancedAUCsespeciallyG2:0769G3:0877improved3455univariateCompareduseincreasedoverall310%79Youdenoptimummoderatedecreasespecificity98756%findingsindicateevaluationimproveinterpretationenablessufficientalsoMultiparametricDual-Time-PointLymphNodeStagingPatientsUntreatedCervicalCarcinoma[18F]FDGkineticmetastasesimaging

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.