Stakeholder perspectives on veterinary student preparedness for workplace clinical training - a qualitative study.

Jennifer Routh, Sharmini Julita Paramasivam, Peter Cockcroft, Vishna Devi Nadarajah, Kamalan Jeevaratnam
Author Information
  1. Jennifer Routh: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. ORCID
  2. Sharmini Julita Paramasivam: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. ORCID
  3. Peter Cockcroft: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. ORCID
  4. Vishna Devi Nadarajah: Division of Human Biology, School of Medicine and IMU Centre for Education, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ORCID
  5. Kamalan Jeevaratnam: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. drkamalanjeeva@gmail.com. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of workplace clinical training (WCT) is important given that veterinary students are licensed to work independently upon graduation. Considering this, it is perhaps surprising that there is limited published work describing what it means to be prepared for this educational experience, particularly given that the transition to WCT can be stressful for students. This paper reports the results of a qualitative study aiming to generate a rich understanding of veterinary student preparedness for WCT using emic, or insider, perspectives of key stakeholders.
METHODS: From a constructivist standpoint, homogenous online group interviews were held with final year veterinary students, recent student alumni, clinical supervisors, faculty, and academic educationalists to discuss what it means to be prepared for WCT. The data was analysed using a template analysis approach.
RESULTS: A three-tier taxonomy to describe preparedness for WCT was constructed from the data. At the topmost level, there were seven themes to illuminate different aspects of preparedness: students should be prepared 1) for the transition to learning and working in a clinical and professional environment, 2) for self-directed and experiential learning whilst working, 3) with a growth mindset, 4) with intrinsic motivation and enthusiasm for learning and working, 5) for communication, consultation and clinical reasoning, 6) with the knowledge for work, and 7) with the practical competence and confidence for work.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a deeper understanding of the tools we can provide, and the attributes we can nurture in, senior veterinary students to facilitate their learning and working during WCT. This improved understanding is a necessary precursor to refining pedagogical support and curriculum design within veterinary schools.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Educ. 2003 Jan;37(1):32-8 [PMID: 12535113]
  2. J Vet Med Educ. 2007 Winter;34(5):645-51 [PMID: 18326777]
  3. J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Summer;37(2):178-89 [PMID: 20576908]
  4. Med Teach. 2014 Nov;36(11):923-39 [PMID: 25072306]
  5. Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):1006-15 [PMID: 21916940]
  6. Vet Rec. 2017 Jun 10;180(23):570 [PMID: 28341723]
  7. BMC Med Educ. 2012 Nov 13;12:112 [PMID: 23145840]
  8. Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):704-12 [PMID: 15960791]
  9. Acad Med. 2008 May;83(5):444-51 [PMID: 18448897]
  10. J Vet Med Educ. 2002 Spring;29(1):36-42 [PMID: 11932839]
  11. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907 [PMID: 29937585]
  12. GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 15;33(1):Doc9 [PMID: 26958657]
  13. PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0249669 [PMID: 33983962]
  14. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Oct 1;219(7):924-31 [PMID: 11601787]
  15. Med Teach. 2001 Mar;23(2):123-137 [PMID: 11371288]
  16. Med Teach. 2016 Jun;38(6):550-63 [PMID: 27145182]
  17. Med Educ. 2013 Feb;47(2):134-43 [PMID: 23323652]
  18. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Nov 15;219(10):1358-65 [PMID: 11724169]
  19. BMC Med Educ. 2011 Sep 22;11:64 [PMID: 21939551]
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 6;21(1):260 [PMID: 33957907]
  21. Med Educ. 2019 Jun;53(6):559-570 [PMID: 31012141]
  22. Med Educ. 2014 Sep;48(9):849-50 [PMID: 25113111]
  23. Vet Rec. 2011 Dec 24-31;169(26):682 [PMID: 22090156]
  24. J Vet Med Educ. 2012 Spring;39(1):62-70 [PMID: 22433741]
  25. J Vet Med Educ. 2013 Winter;40(4):355-62 [PMID: 24052418]
  26. Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):40-50 [PMID: 27981658]
  27. J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Summer;37(2):190-7 [PMID: 20576909]
  28. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017 Jul 15;251(2):172-184 [PMID: 28671494]
  29. J Vet Med Educ. 2008 Spring;35(1):11-3 [PMID: 18339949]
  30. J Vet Med Educ. 2019 Spring;46(1):21-27 [PMID: 30285591]
  31. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010 Jul 1;237(1):53-64 [PMID: 20590495]
  32. Acad Med. 1998 Apr;73(4):403-7 [PMID: 9580717]
  33. J Health Organ Manag. 2010;24(6):556-70 [PMID: 21155432]
  34. Vet Rec. 2020 Feb 22;186(7):216 [PMID: 31767696]
  35. Med Educ. 1992 Jan;26(1):17-20 [PMID: 1538650]
  36. Med Educ. 2021 Sep;55(9):1078-1090 [PMID: 33617656]
  37. Vet Rec. 2018 Nov 24;183(20):623 [PMID: 30327350]
  38. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67 [PMID: 10620381]
  39. J Vet Med Educ. 2017 Spring;44(1):141-146 [PMID: 28206837]
  40. J Vet Med Educ. 2012 Winter;39(4):341-58 [PMID: 23187027]
  41. J Vet Med Educ. 2017 Fall;44(3):542-551 [PMID: 28876989]
  42. Aust Vet J. 2012 Mar;90(3):100-4 [PMID: 22339122]
  43. Vet Rec Open. 2015 Aug 13;2(2):e000116 [PMID: 26392910]
  44. Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1709-16 [PMID: 20881818]
  45. Acad Med. 2010 Dec;85(12):1862-9 [PMID: 20978432]
  46. J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Summer;36(2):209-15 [PMID: 19625670]
  47. Clin Teach. 2015 Dec;12(6):367-72 [PMID: 26487286]
  48. Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 07;9:833034 [PMID: 35464375]
  49. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Apr;30(3):245-51 [PMID: 19963307]
  50. Acad Med. 2009 Apr;84(4):451-8 [PMID: 19318777]
  51. Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Nov;60(11):1414-8 [PMID: 16787438]
  52. J Vet Med Educ. 2008 Fall;35(3):431-8 [PMID: 19066361]

MeSH Term

Animals
Curriculum
Educational Status
Humans
Qualitative Research
Students
Workplace

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0WCTveterinaryclinicalstudentslearningworkworkingpreparedcanstudyunderstandingstudentpreparednessworkplacetraininggivenmeanstransitionqualitativeusingperspectivesdataBACKGROUND:successimportantlicensedindependentlyupongraduationConsideringperhapssurprisinglimitedpublisheddescribingeducationalexperienceparticularlystressfulpaperreportsresultsaiminggeneraterichemicinsiderkeystakeholdersMETHODS:constructiviststandpointhomogenousonlinegroupinterviewsheldfinalyearrecentalumnisupervisorsfacultyacademiceducationalistsdiscussanalysedtemplateanalysisapproachRESULTS:three-tiertaxonomydescribeconstructedtopmostlevelseventhemesilluminatedifferentaspectspreparedness:1professionalenvironment2self-directedexperientialwhilst3growthmindset4intrinsicmotivationenthusiasm5communicationconsultationreasoning6knowledge7practicalcompetenceconfidenceCONCLUSIONS:providesdeepertoolsprovideattributesnurtureseniorfacilitateimprovednecessaryprecursorrefiningpedagogicalsupportcurriculumdesignwithinschoolsStakeholder-ClinicalplacementsExpectationsPreparednessReadinessRotationsWorkplace

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)