Who falls for fake news? Psychological and clinical profiling evidence of fake news consumers.

Álex Escolà-Gascón, Neil Dagnall, Andrew Denovan, Kenneth Drinkwater, Miriam Diez-Bosch
Author Information
  1. Álex Escolà-Gascón: Blanquerna Faculty of Communication and International Relations, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Neil Dagnall: Psychology Department Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  3. Andrew Denovan: University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
  4. Kenneth Drinkwater: Psychology Department Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  5. Miriam Diez-Bosch: Blanquerna Faculty of Communication and International Relations, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

Awareness of the potential psychological significance of false news increased during the coronavirus pandemic, however, its impact on psychopathology and individual differences remains unclear. Acknowledging this, the authors investigated the psychological and psychopathological profiles that characterize fake news consumption. A total of 1452 volunteers from the general population with no previous psychiatric history participated. They responded to clinical psychopathology assessment tests. Respondents solved a fake news screening test, which allowed them to be allocated to a quasi-experimental condition: group 1 (non-fake news consumers) or group 2 (fake news consumers). Mean comparison, Bayesian inference, and multiple regression analyses were applied. Participants with a schizotypal, paranoid, and histrionic personality were ineffective at detecting fake news. They were also more vulnerable to suffer its negative effects. Specifically, they displayed higher levels of anxiety and committed more cognitive biases based on suggestibility and the Barnum Effect. No significant effects on psychotic symptomatology or affective mood states were observed. Corresponding to these outcomes, two clinical and therapeutic recommendations related to the reduction of the Barnum Effect and the reinterpretation of digital media sensationalism were made. The impact of fake news and possible ways of prevention are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 09;5(1):eaau4586 [PMID: 30662946]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70 [PMID: 3397865]
  3. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113540 [PMID: 33142144]
  4. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Feb;146:135-148 [PMID: 34979358]
  5. Public Underst Sci. 2020 Aug;29(6):597-613 [PMID: 32597367]
  6. J Bus Res. 2022 Feb;140:670-683 [PMID: 34866715]
  7. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1865-1880 [PMID: 30247057]
  8. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0246757 [PMID: 33705405]
  9. Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096 [PMID: 29590025]
  10. Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 25;6:206 [PMID: 25762969]
  11. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):56 [PMID: 32039720]
  12. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;68(7):1454-1461 [PMID: 34240638]
  13. Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):572-85 [PMID: 25217762]
  14. Br J Psychol. 2005 May;96(Pt 2):165-79 [PMID: 15969829]
  15. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110771 [PMID: 33612906]
  16. Span J Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;24:e25 [PMID: 33840397]
  17. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):1171-1181 [PMID: 34177101]
  18. Vaccine. 2021 Apr 1;39(14):1877-1881 [PMID: 33715904]
  19. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402 [PMID: 33736957]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780 [PMID: 32603243]
  21. AIDS Behav. 2020 Oct;24(10):2927-2934 [PMID: 32239358]
  22. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Apr;53(5):648-55 [PMID: 19952767]
  23. Global Health. 2020 Jul 30;16(1):72 [PMID: 32731864]
  24. Vaccine. 2010 Feb 17;28(7):1709-16 [PMID: 20045099]
  25. Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Mar;92:221-225 [PMID: 30690323]
  26. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 16;12:646394 [PMID: 33935904]
  27. Schizophr Res. 2022 Mar;241:122-129 [PMID: 35121437]
  28. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Aug;149(8):1608-1613 [PMID: 31916834]
  29. Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jan;295:113628 [PMID: 33340799]
  30. Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):e1-9 [PMID: 26029941]
  31. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 20;9(2):e89177 [PMID: 24586574]
  32. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 19;15(3):e0230365 [PMID: 32191741]
  33. Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):392-405 [PMID: 21751996]
  34. Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 16;:1-15 [PMID: 33722315]
  35. Telemat Inform. 2021 Jan;56:101475 [PMID: 34887612]
  36. Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 08;8:942 [PMID: 28642726]
  37. Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 26;9:35 [PMID: 29434562]
  38. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:566790 [PMID: 33192844]
  39. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;75(2):e13778 [PMID: 33480171]
  40. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47 [PMID: 33026546]
  41. J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):185-200 [PMID: 30929263]
  42. Heliyon. 2020 Jul 07;6(7):e04291 [PMID: 32671247]
  43. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 28;12:670959 [PMID: 34262510]
  44. Think Skills Creat. 2021 Dec;42:100934 [PMID: 35154504]
  45. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Jan;48(1):65-77 [PMID: 33514279]
  46. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):53-70 [PMID: 26151919]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0newsfakeclinicalconsumerspsychologicalimpactpsychopathologydifferencesgroupeffectsbiasesBarnumEffectpreventionAwarenesspotentialsignificancefalseincreasedcoronaviruspandemichoweverindividualremainsunclearAcknowledgingauthorsinvestigatedpsychopathologicalprofilescharacterizeconsumptiontotal1452volunteersgeneralpopulationpreviouspsychiatrichistoryparticipatedrespondedassessmenttestsRespondentssolvedscreeningtestallowedallocatedquasi-experimentalcondition:1non-fake2MeancomparisonBayesianinferencemultipleregressionanalysesappliedParticipantsschizotypalparanoidhistrionicpersonalityineffectivedetectingalsovulnerablesuffernegativeSpecificallydisplayedhigherlevelsanxietycommittedcognitivebasedsuggestibilitysignificantpsychoticsymptomatologyaffectivemoodstatesobservedCorrespondingoutcomestwotherapeuticrecommendationsrelatedreductionreinterpretationdigitalmediasensationalismmadepossiblewaysdiscussedfallsnews?PsychologicalprofilingevidenceClinicalCognitiveFakeIndividualPseudoscientificinformation

Similar Articles

Cited By