Rotational thromboelastometry in critically ill COVID-19 patients does not predict thrombosis.

Romein W G Dujardin, Gabriel Garcia Rosenbaum, Timo C J Klercq, Jecko Thachil, Nathan D Nielsen, Nicole P Juffermans
Author Information
  1. Romein W G Dujardin: Department of Intensive Care OLVG Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Gabriel Garcia Rosenbaum: Department of Internal Medicine University of New Mexico School of Medicine Albuquerque New Mexico USA.
  3. Timo C J Klercq: Department of Intensive Care OLVG Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands.
  4. Jecko Thachil: Department of Haematology Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK. ORCID
  5. Nathan D Nielsen: Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine University of New Mexico School of Medicine Albuquerque New Mexico USA.
  6. Nicole P Juffermans: Department of Intensive Care OLVG Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands.

Abstract

Background: Critically ill COVID-19 patients are in a hypercoagulable state with increased risk of thrombotic complications. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastic test with the potential to reflect COVID-19-associated hypercoagulability and may therefore be useful to predict thrombotic complications.
Objective: To investigate the potential of ROTEM profiles to predict thrombotic complications in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Patients/Methods: Retrospective multicenter cohort study in 113 adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of two large teaching hospitals in the United States and in the Netherlands. ROTEM profiles of the EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM tracings were measured within 72 h of ICU admission. Thrombotic complications encompass both arterial and venous thromboembolic complications, diagnosed with electrocardiogram, ultrasound, or computed tomography. ROTEM profiles were compared between patients with and without thrombosis. Univariable logistic regression followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to identify ROTEM parameters associated with thrombosis.
Results and Conclusions: Of 113 patients, 27 (23.9%) developed a thrombotic event. In the univariable analysis, EXTEM clot amplitude at 10 min (CA10) and EXTEM maximum clot formation (MCF) were associated with thrombosis with a  < 0.2 ( = 0.07 and  = 0.05, respectively). In ROC curve analysis, EXTEM CA10 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.58 (95% CI 0.47-0.70) and EXTEM MCF had an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI 0.49-0.71). Thereby, ROTEM profiles at ICU admission did not have the potential to differentiate between patients with a high and low risk for thrombotic complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Thromb Res. 2021 Mar;199:143-148 [PMID: 33535120]
  2. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Apr;51(3):595-607 [PMID: 33586113]
  3. Thromb Res. 2021 Apr;200:87-90 [PMID: 33549899]
  4. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Apr 26;8:654174 [PMID: 33981736]
  5. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 May;51(4):966-970 [PMID: 33026569]
  6. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul;18(7):1747-1751 [PMID: 32302448]
  7. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Nov;18(11):2942-2953 [PMID: 32881304]
  8. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Sep 06;6(6):e12798 [PMID: 36090158]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 26;385(9):777-789 [PMID: 34351722]
  10. Thromb Res. 2020 Dec;196:308-312 [PMID: 32977128]
  11. Thromb Haemost. 2021 Sep;121(9):1181-1192 [PMID: 33401332]
  12. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 05;(8):CD010864 [PMID: 27494075]
  13. JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1620-1630 [PMID: 33734299]
  14. Crit Care. 2020 Dec 7;24(1):676 [PMID: 33287877]
  15. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jul;4(3):229-32 [PMID: 25337485]
  16. Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Jan;25(1):45-8 [PMID: 23948628]
  17. Thromb Res. 2009;123 Suppl 4:S11-7 [PMID: 19303496]
  18. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 16;10(8): [PMID: 33923851]
  19. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 18;19:287 [PMID: 26283414]
  20. Thromb Res. 2020 Oct;194:101-115 [PMID: 32788101]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientscomplicationsROTEMthromboticEXTEMthrombosisCOVID-19profiles0illthromboelastometrypotentialpredictICUanalysisriskRotationalhypercoagulabilitycritically113careadmissionROCassociatedclotCA10MCF = 0curveAUC95%CIBackground:CriticallyhypercoagulablestateincreasedviscoelastictestreflectCOVID-19-associatedmaythereforeusefulObjective:investigatePatients/Methods:RetrospectivemulticentercohortstudyadultconfirmedinfectionadmittedintensiveunittwolargeteachinghospitalsUnitedStatesNetherlandsINTEMFIBTEMtracingsmeasuredwithin72 hThromboticencompassarterialvenousthromboembolicdiagnosedelectrocardiogramultrasoundcomputedtomographycomparedwithoutUnivariablelogisticregressionfollowedreceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurvesperformedidentifyparametersResultsConclusions:27239%developedeventunivariableamplitude10 minmaximumformation< 020705respectivelyarea5847-0706049-071TherebydifferentiatehighlowCOVID‐19critical

Similar Articles

Cited By