BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of cognitive and pathological heterogeneity in early-stage Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Data-driven approaches have demonstrated cognitive heterogeneity in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but few studies have examined this heterogeneity and its association with progression to MCI/dementia in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. OBJECTIVE: We identified cluster-derived subgroups of CU participants based on comprehensive neuropsychological data and compared baseline characteristics and rates of progression to MCI/dementia or a Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) of ���129 across subgroups. METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on individual baseline neuropsychological test scores from 365 CU participants in the UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center longitudinal cohort. Cox regressions examined the risk of progression to consensus diagnosis of MCI or dementia, or to DRS score ���129, by cluster group. RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified 5 groups: All-Average (n���=���139), Low-Visuospatial (n���=���46), Low-Executive (n���=���51), Low-Memory/Language (n���=���83), and Low-All Domains (n���=���46). Subgroups had unique demographic and clinical characteristics. Rates of progression to MCI/dementia or to DRS ���129 were faster for all subgroups (Low-All Domains progressed the fastest���>���Low Memory/Language���Low-Visuospatial and Low-Executive) relative to the All-Average subgroup. CONCLUSION: Faster progression in the Low-Visuospatial, Low-Executive, and Low-Memory/Language groups compared to the All-Average group suggests that there are multiple pathways and/or unique subtle cognitive decline profiles that ultimately lead to a diagnosis of MCI/dementia. Use of comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries that assess several domains may be a key first step toward an individualized approach to early detection and fewer missed opportunities for early intervention.
