The Influence of Host Aphids on the Performance of .

Zhen-Xiang Li, Meng-Qi Ji, Chi Zhang, Yi-Bing Yang, Zhen-Zhen Chen, Hai-Peng Zhao, Yong-Yu Xu, Zhi-Wei Kang
Author Information
  1. Zhen-Xiang Li: College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
  2. Meng-Qi Ji: School of Life Science, Institutes of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China.
  3. Chi Zhang: Rural Energy and Environment Agency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China.
  4. Yi-Bing Yang: Jinxiang County Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Jining 272200, China.
  5. Zhen-Zhen Chen: College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
  6. Hai-Peng Zhao: College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
  7. Yong-Yu Xu: College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
  8. Zhi-Wei Kang: College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China. ORCID

Abstract

The aphid parasitoid Walker is an important biological control agent against many aphid species. In this study, we examined whether the rearing host aphid species (the pea aphid, and the grain aphid, ) affect the performance of . We found that -reared showed a significantly larger body size (body length and hind tibia length) and shorter developmental time than -reared . There was no difference in the sex ratio between them. The longevity of -reared was also significantly longer than that of -reared . Furthermore, -reared presented stronger parasitic capacity and starvation resistance than -reared . In addition, host aphid alteration experiments showed that only takes two generations to adapt to its new host. Taken together, these results revealed that is a better alternative host aphid for mass-rearing and releasing of . The body size plasticity of is also discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Insects. 2022 May 09;13(5): [PMID: 35621782]
  2. Bull Entomol Res. 2020 Oct;110(5):630-637 [PMID: 32419690]
  3. Neotrop Entomol. 2019 Jun;48(3):391-398 [PMID: 30617739]
  4. Front Physiol. 2017 Nov 28;8:976 [PMID: 29234290]
  5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(2):1983-1993 [PMID: 30460660]
  6. Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Sep;73(9):1804-1812 [PMID: 28139069]
  7. J Insect Sci. 2014;14:118 [PMID: 25368062]
  8. Annu Rev Entomol. 2021 Jan 7;66:463-484 [PMID: 32976724]
  9. J Econ Entomol. 2020 Jun 6;113(3):1211-1220 [PMID: 32112092]
  10. J Econ Entomol. 2020 Dec 9;113(6):2634-2640 [PMID: 32964236]
  11. J Econ Entomol. 2019 Aug 3;112(4):1560-1574 [PMID: 31053849]
  12. Bull Entomol Res. 2016 Oct;106(5):633-41 [PMID: 27215662]
  13. Annu Rev Entomol. 2004;49:219-42 [PMID: 14651463]
  14. J Econ Entomol. 2019 Dec 9;112(6):2597-2603 [PMID: 31386158]
  15. J Econ Entomol. 2015 Jun;108(3):933-9 [PMID: 26470213]
  16. J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jul;83(4):758-68 [PMID: 24417336]
  17. Bull Entomol Res. 2001 Oct;91(5):363-8 [PMID: 11583599]
  18. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2018 Apr;26:17-24 [PMID: 29764656]
  19. Exp Appl Acarol. 2015 Apr;65(4):419-33 [PMID: 25524511]
  20. Insects. 2019 Jun 25;10(6): [PMID: 31242634]
  21. Ecotoxicology. 2012 May;21(4):973-92 [PMID: 22350105]
  22. Evolution. 2008 Mar;62(3):689-99 [PMID: 18182071]
  23. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 01;11(7):e0156831 [PMID: 27367523]
  24. Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 11;9:1729 [PMID: 30618780]
  25. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011 Dec;49(12):3086-9 [PMID: 21946071]
  26. Environ Pollut. 2018 Nov;242(Pt A):507-518 [PMID: 30005263]
  27. J Econ Entomol. 2017 Jun 1;110(3):949-953 [PMID: 28398560]
  28. Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 6;8(1):13323 [PMID: 30190608]
  29. J Econ Entomol. 2022 Feb 9;115(1):74-80 [PMID: 34958100]
  30. Pest Manag Sci. 2003 Feb;59(2):149-55 [PMID: 12587868]
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 18;102(3):684-9 [PMID: 15647346]
  32. Genome Biol. 2017 Feb 13;18(1):27 [PMID: 28190401]
  33. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2014 Aug;51:41-51 [PMID: 24855024]
  34. J Econ Entomol. 2019 May 22;112(3):1062-1072 [PMID: 30689916]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0aphid-rearedhostbodysizebiologicalspeciesperformanceshowedsignificantlylengthalsoplasticityparasitoidWalkerimportantcontrolagentmanystudyexaminedwhetherrearingpeagrainaffectfoundlargerhindtibiashorterdevelopmentaltimedifferencesexratiolongevitylongerFurthermorepresentedstrongerparasiticcapacitystarvationresistanceadditionalterationexperimentstakestwogenerationsadaptnewTakentogetherresultsrevealedbetteralternativemass-rearingreleasingdiscussedInfluenceHostAphidsPerformanceAphelinusasychisaphids

Similar Articles

Cited By