A Single Fast Test for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence-oVEMP n10 to 4000 Hz-Depends on Stimulus Rise Time.

Ian S Curthoys, Ann M Burgess, Leonardo Manzari, Christopher J Pastras
Author Information
  1. Ian S Curthoys: Vestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. ORCID
  2. Ann M Burgess: Vestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
  3. Leonardo Manzari: MSA ENT Academy Center, 03043 Cassino, Italy. ORCID
  4. Christopher J Pastras: Faculty of Engineering and Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

As previously reported, a single test measuring oVEMP n10 to 4000 Hz stimuli (bone-conducted vibration (BCV) or air-conducted sound (ACS)) provides a definitive diagnosis of semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) in 22 CT-verified patients, with a sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 1.0. This single short screening test has great advantages of speed, minimizing testing time, and the exposure of patients to stimulation. However, a few studies of the 4000 Hz test for SCD have reported sensitivity and specificity values which are slightly less than reported previously. We hypothesized that the rise time of the stimulus is important for detecting the oVEMP n10 to 4000 Hz, similarly to what we had shown for 500 and 750 Hz BCV. We measured oVEMP n10 in 15 patients with CT-verified SCD in response to 4000 Hz ACS or BCV stimuli with rise times of 0, 1, and 2 ms. As a result, increasing the rise time of the stimulus reduced the oVEMP n10 amplitude. This outcome is expected from the physiological evidence of guinea pig primary vestibular afferents, which are activated by sound or vibration. Therefore, for clinical VEMP testing, short rise times are optimal (preferably 0 ms).

Keywords

References

  1. Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct;115(10):1717-27 [PMID: 16222184]
  2. Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 25;11:879 [PMID: 32982915]
  3. Audiol Res. 2022 Apr 14;12(2):202-211 [PMID: 35447743]
  4. Am J Otol. 2000 Jan;21(1):9-19 [PMID: 10651428]
  5. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Jun;125(6):660-4 [PMID: 10367923]
  6. Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):799-805 [PMID: 23732683]
  7. Otol Neurotol. 2004 May;25(3):323-32 [PMID: 15129113]
  8. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Sep;119(9):2135-47 [PMID: 18639490]
  9. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Apr;235(4):957-972 [PMID: 28130556]
  10. Hear Res. 2019 Mar 1;373:59-70 [PMID: 30599427]
  11. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Dec;40(10):1353-1358 [PMID: 31725592]
  12. Front Neurol. 2020 Jul 21;11:695 [PMID: 32793102]
  13. Hear Res. 2011 Oct;280(1-2):133-40 [PMID: 21664446]
  14. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Jul 1;122(1):259-276 [PMID: 31042414]
  15. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jul;149(1):142-5 [PMID: 23674567]
  16. Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(3):437-45 [PMID: 23161155]
  17. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Apr;40(4):e406-e414 [PMID: 30870375]
  18. Hear Res. 2017 Oct;354:38-47 [PMID: 28850921]
  19. Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 27;11:549817 [PMID: 33192980]
  20. Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 18;12:704095 [PMID: 34220698]
  21. Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 20;11:612075 [PMID: 33329372]
  22. Neurology. 2000 Dec 26;55(12):1833-41 [PMID: 11134382]
  23. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 6;8(1):10257 [PMID: 29980716]
  24. J Vestib Res. 2021;31(3):131-141 [PMID: 33522990]
  25. Ear Hear. 2021 Feb 18;42(5):1295-1305 [PMID: 33625057]
  26. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;121(2):132-44 [PMID: 19897412]
  27. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Sep;271(9):2401-7 [PMID: 24096809]
  28. Front Neurol. 2018 May 25;9:366 [PMID: 29887827]
  29. Neurology. 2017 Nov 28;89(22):2288-2296 [PMID: 29093067]
  30. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov 1;122(5):2000-2015 [PMID: 31596627]
  31. Ear Hear. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):508-20 [PMID: 22441357]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0oVEMPn104000Hztest0risevestibularreportedBCVSCDpatients1testingtimepreviouslysinglestimulivibrationsoundACSCT-verifiedsensitivityspecificityshortscreeningstimulustimesmsclinicalmeasuringbone-conductedair-conductedprovidesdefinitivediagnosissemicircularcanaldehiscence22greatadvantagesspeedminimizingexposurestimulationHoweverstudiesvaluesslightlylesshypothesizedimportantdetectingsimilarlyshown500750measured15response2resultincreasingreducedamplitudeoutcomeexpectedphysiologicalevidenceguineapigprimaryafferentsactivatedThereforeVEMPoptimalpreferablySingleFastTestSemicircularCanalDehiscence-oVEMPHz-DependsStimulusRiseTimeaudiootolithutricular

Similar Articles

Cited By