Exploring mental health clients' current medication knowledge, beliefs and experience with healthcare providers in the community in South Australia.

Tien Ngoc Thi Bui, Elizabeth Hotham, Mark Loughhead, Sara S McMillan, Nicholas Procter, Kessie Poole, Vijayaprakash Suppiah
Author Information
  1. Tien Ngoc Thi Bui: UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. ORCID
  2. Elizabeth Hotham: UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. ORCID
  3. Mark Loughhead: UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. ORCID
  4. Sara S McMillan: Quality Use of Medicines Network, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. ORCID
  5. Nicholas Procter: UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. ORCID
  6. Kessie Poole: Sub-Acute Services, Mind Australia Limited, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  7. Vijayaprakash Suppiah: UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

In Australia, mental illness has been recognised as a National Health Priority area, with the coronavirus pandemic adding a layer of urgency to the need to address the multiple health problems faced by clients with mental illnesses. Whilst much has been done in efforts to support these clients, little is known about their medication knowledge and experience with health professionals. The aim of the study was to explore the knowledge and beliefs of clients on the use of psychotropic medications and study their experiences with healthcare providers. Adult participants at a not-for-profit community-managed specialist mental health service provider in Adelaide, South Australia were recruited. Four focus group sessions were conducted between February 2020 and March 2021. All sessions were co-facilitated by a peer practitioner with lived experience. Sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants (n = 27) reported that provision of medication education was inadequate and, in some cases, non-existent. There was an apparent lack of support for monitoring and managing common side effects, such as weight gain. Participants described not being involved in any decision-making processes and that establishing and maintaining a therapeutic relationship with their healthcare providers was challenging. Perceived stigma remains a barrier in accessing healthcare. Despite participants regularly interacting with a range of healthcare providers, findings highlight key gaps in care, particularly medication education and establishing a therapeutic relationship with their healthcare providers. Future mental health reforms should consider the provision of additional medication education in community settings, such as at not-for-profit organisations. Moreover, healthcare providers should take a proactive approach in establishing therapeutic relationships.

Keywords

References

  1. World Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;15(1):13-20 [PMID: 26833597]
  2. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18635 [PMID: 31895824]
  3. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Aug;25(4):294-302 [PMID: 21784287]
  4. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2002 Feb;9(1):87-94 [PMID: 11896861]
  5. Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2107-20 [PMID: 24612376]
  6. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Mar 23;16:781-787 [PMID: 32256074]
  7. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907 [PMID: 29937585]
  8. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):339 [PMID: 32605645]
  9. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr;83(1):3-6 [PMID: 20605395]
  10. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7 Suppl 5:24-31 [PMID: 16225557]
  11. Int J Pharm Pract. 2017 Dec;25(6):454-462 [PMID: 28303618]
  12. Schizophr Res Treatment. 2014;2014:341545 [PMID: 24693426]
  13. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 5;325(23):1650-2 [PMID: 1944456]
  14. Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May;69(682):259-260 [PMID: 31023693]
  15. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Dec;13(4):242-8 [PMID: 15660592]
  16. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504 [PMID: 9117204]
  17. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007 Sep;34(5):435-42 [PMID: 17653845]
  18. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 May - Jun;52:74-80 [PMID: 28325533]
  19. World Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;11(1):47-51 [PMID: 22295009]
  20. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2009 Jan;2(1):31-8 [PMID: 25126270]
  21. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Jun;44(2):136-44 [PMID: 22551013]
  22. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov;21(11):1172-7 [PMID: 17026727]
  23. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2012 Nov;9(11-12):42-6 [PMID: 23346518]
  24. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 May;46(5):373-9 [PMID: 20225134]
  25. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Jun;24(3):253-61 [PMID: 25529392]
  26. Qual Health Res. 2006 Apr;16(4):547-59 [PMID: 16513996]
  27. Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5968-e5978 [PMID: 36148522]
  28. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858 [PMID: 30496104]
  29. J Psychiatr Pract. 2009 Jan;15(1):34-44 [PMID: 19182563]
  30. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2013 Aug;3(4):200-18 [PMID: 24167693]
  31. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;10:414 [PMID: 31244699]
  32. Community Ment Health J. 2018 Oct;54(7):951-958 [PMID: 29948627]
  33. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;20(6):521-6 [PMID: 19085408]
  34. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Mar-Apr;61(2):e61-e64 [PMID: 33189556]
  35. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 May;54(5):447-448 [PMID: 32370594]
  36. J Hum Lact. 2019 May;35(2):220-222 [PMID: 30849272]
  37. Int J Pharm Pract. 2016 Feb;24(1):13-21 [PMID: 25988371]
  38. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2014 Oct;5(4):374-83 [PMID: 25288840]
  39. BJPsych Adv. 2018 Sep;24(5):319-333 [PMID: 30174829]
  40. Australas Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;25(6):578-582 [PMID: 29017332]
  41. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Jan 02;7:2050312118822927 [PMID: 30637106]
  42. World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153 [PMID: 28498575]
  43. Bipolar Disord. 2007 Sep;9(6):656-64 [PMID: 17845282]
  44. BMJ. 2010 Oct 14;341:c5146 [PMID: 20947577]
  45. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;62(7):717-24 [PMID: 15997012]
  46. Future Hosp J. 2016 Jun;3(2):117-120 [PMID: 31098201]
  47. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Sep;39(9):963-6 [PMID: 3215645]
  48. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):308-315 [PMID: 28841260]

MeSH Term

Adult
Humans
Mental Health
South Australia
Mental Disorders
Health Personnel
Mental Health Services

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mentalhealthmedicationhealthcareprovidersknowledgetherapeuticAustraliaclientsexperienceeducationestablishingrelationshipcommunitysupportstudybeliefsparticipantsnot-for-profitSouthsessionsParticipantsprovisionillnessrecognisedNationalHealthPriorityareacoronaviruspandemicaddinglayerurgencyneedaddressmultipleproblemsfacedillnessesWhilstmuchdoneeffortslittleknownprofessionalsaimexploreusepsychotropicmedicationsexperiencesAdultcommunity-managedspecialistserviceproviderAdelaiderecruitedFourfocusgroupconductedFebruary2020March2021co-facilitatedpeerpractitionerlivedSessionsaudiorecordedtranscribedverbatimn = 27reportedinadequatecasesnon-existentapparentlackmonitoringmanagingcommonsideeffectsweightgaindescribedinvolveddecision-makingprocessesmaintainingchallengingPerceivedstigmaremainsbarrieraccessingDespiteregularlyinteractingrangefindingshighlightkeygapscareparticularlyFuturereformsconsideradditionalsettingsorganisationsMoreovertakeproactiveapproachrelationshipsExploringclients'currentcounsellingdisordersshareddecisionmaking

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)