Association between migration paths and mental health of new-generation migrants in China: The mediating effect of social integration.

Fenfen Zhou, Boli Peng, Muyang Chu, Hui Zhang, Lishuo Shi, Li Ling
Author Information
  1. Fenfen Zhou: Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  2. Boli Peng: Department of Actuarial Science, School of Insurance, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, China.
  3. Muyang Chu: Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  4. Hui Zhang: Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  5. Lishuo Shi: The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  6. Li Ling: Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Abstract

Background: The new-generation migrants born in 1980 and later are large and vulnerable internal migrants in China. Migration paths and social integration are important factors to explain for their mental health. However, they faced difficulties in social integration varying from migration paths. We aimed to explore the mediating role of social integration between migration paths and the mental health of new-generation migrants.
Methods: The migration paths included urban-to-urban, urban-to-rural, rural-to-urban and rural-to-rural. Mental health was assessed by the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6) and the Perceived Stress Scales (PSS-4). Social integration was measured by economic integration, life integration, maintenance of the local culture, acceptance of the host culture and psychological integration. Multiple linear regressions with bootstrapping were used to examine the mediating effect.
Results: A total of 9,830 new-generation migrants were included in this study. The mean age was 26.92 ( = 4.47) years and the proportion of rural-to-urban migrants was 63.7%. Compared with the new generation of rural-to-rural migrants, rural-to-urban migrants had higher psychological distress (β = 0.305, 95% CI: 0.152-0.458) and perceived stress (β = 0.328, 95% CI: 0.199-0.456). The bootstrapping test found that two dimensions ("life integration" and "acceptance of the host culture") of social integration as a mediator weakened the negative effect of the rural-to-urban migration path on the mental health of new-generation migrants.
Conclusion: Rural-to-urban migrants had poorer mental health, and the association was mediated by their poorer social integration. The migration policies developed to enhance social integration could effectively improve the mental health of new-generation migrants.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91 [PMID: 18697684]
  2. Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Oct;34(10):1022-32 [PMID: 25051943]
  3. Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jul 24;17(1):105 [PMID: 30041631]
  4. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 15;7(3):e014313 [PMID: 28298368]
  5. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2016 Sep;31(3):255-75 [PMID: 27236539]
  6. Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;6:179 [PMID: 29971226]
  7. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Jun;27(3):256-265 [PMID: 28067189]
  8. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(37):e4783 [PMID: 27631229]
  9. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;27(1):51-63 [PMID: 25738865]
  10. BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 25;10:513 [PMID: 20735860]
  11. Lancet. 2008 Nov 15;372(9651):1717-9 [PMID: 18930533]
  12. Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Jun;29(3):387-418 [PMID: 11469114]
  13. Health Place. 2019 Jul;58:102073 [PMID: 30639200]
  14. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar - Apr;81:31-38 [PMID: 30502567]
  15. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;42(9):716-22 [PMID: 17598056]
  16. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148397 [PMID: 26863008]
  17. Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;63:105-12 [PMID: 26555498]
  18. Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):173-81 [PMID: 11523746]
  19. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 16;14:1280 [PMID: 25510169]
  20. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2017 Jan - Mar;10(1):45-58 [PMID: 27291831]
  21. J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 15;307:11-19 [PMID: 35351493]
  22. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;48(10):1569-81 [PMID: 23508367]
  23. Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 7;8(35):59791-59799 [PMID: 28938682]
  24. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 30;9(12):e034255 [PMID: 31892669]
  25. Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jul;69(7):526 [PMID: 22374180]
  26. J Women Aging. 2015;27(3):195-215 [PMID: 25607717]
  27. BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 02;11:841 [PMID: 22044598]
  28. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 [PMID: 3806354]
  29. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193355 [PMID: 31050782]
  30. Community Ment Health J. 2012 Jun;48(3):342-51 [PMID: 21394472]
  31. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(8):1294-301 [PMID: 21435765]
  32. Int J Public Health. 2012 Aug;57(4):691-8 [PMID: 22015649]
  33. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;4(3):218-229 [PMID: 28161455]
  34. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1997 Winter;43(4):247-56 [PMID: 9483452]
  35. Lancet HIV. 2021 Dec;8(12):e787-e792 [PMID: 34774183]
  36. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 20;12:751411 [PMID: 34744840]
  37. Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 4;16(1):139 [PMID: 28778201]
  38. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113700 [PMID: 33497940]
  39. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014 Jul;5(2):233-9 [PMID: 25097389]
  40. Int J Public Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):39-48 [PMID: 29947822]
  41. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;16(14): [PMID: 31336662]
  42. BMJ Open. 2019 May 5;9(5):e022712 [PMID: 31061011]
  43. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Sep;260:113210 [PMID: 32693311]
  44. Stud Fam Plann. 2016 Mar;47(1):83-6 [PMID: 27027994]
  45. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e420-e435 [PMID: 30852188]
  46. J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):198-207 [PMID: 21705089]
  47. Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76 [PMID: 12214795]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0migrantsintegrationsocialhealthnew-generationmentalmigrationpathsrural-to-urban0mediatingeffect=Chinaincludedrural-to-ruralculturehostpsychologicalbootstrappingβ95%CI:poorerBackground:born1980laterlargevulnerableinternalMigrationimportantfactorsexplainHoweverfaceddifficultiesvaryingaimedexploreroleMethods:urban-to-urbanurban-to-ruralMentalassessedKesslerScreeningScalePsychologicalDistressK6PerceivedStressScalesPSS-4SocialmeasuredeconomiclifemaintenancelocalacceptanceMultiplelinearregressionsusedexamineResults:total9830studymeanage2692447yearsproportion637%Comparednewgenerationhigherdistress305152-0458perceivedstress328199-0456testfoundtwodimensions"lifeintegration""acceptanceculture"mediatorweakenednegativepathConclusion:Rural-to-urbanassociationmediatedpoliciesdevelopedenhanceeffectivelyimproveAssociationChina:ruralurban

Similar Articles

Cited By