Stock market volatility from the Covid-19 pandemic: New evidence from the Asia-Pacific region.

Duc Hong Vo, Chi Minh Ho, Tam Hoang-Nhat Dang
Author Information
  1. Duc Hong Vo: Research Centre in Business, Economics & Resources, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan Street, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  2. Chi Minh Ho: Research Centre in Business, Economics & Resources, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan Street, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  3. Tam Hoang-Nhat Dang: Research Centre in Business, Economics & Resources, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan Street, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Abstract

Responses from stock markets to the Covid-19 pandemic appear to change over time. Recent responses might differ as herd mentality in stock markets tends to become herd immunity to the pandemic. This study revisits the pandemic's effects on the Asia-Pacific countries' market volatility over the past 25 months. Primarily, we examine the changes of the impacts of the pandemic on volatility between the first pandemic period (2020) and the second period (January 2021-January 2022). Our findings indicate that implementing pandemic control measures helps reduce market volatility at the country and region levels. The effects of new Covid-19 cases and pandemic control measures on market volatility have been dramatically fading since 2021. The Toda-Yamamoto causality test and the panel impulse response functions from panel VAR estimation are also used for robustness analysis. Based on our findings, it appears that the current pandemic may no longer be blamed for stock market volatility in the Asia-Pacific region.

Keywords

References

  1. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101604 [PMID: 32837363]
  2. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101528 [PMID: 32837360]
  3. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538 [PMID: 33686204]
  4. Heliyon. 2021 Jan 16;7(1):e05851 [PMID: 33506122]
  5. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0248703 [PMID: 33793586]
  6. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101691 [PMID: 32837378]
  7. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Aug;169:120840 [PMID: 36540547]
  8. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101732 [PMID: 32843886]
  9. Int Rev Financ Anal. 2018 Mar;56:153-166 [PMID: 38620259]
  10. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101597 [PMID: 32550842]
  11. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100326 [PMID: 32292707]
  12. J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Aug;188:1088-1108 [PMID: 34629573]
  13. Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jan;44:102047 [PMID: 35013674]
  14. Heliyon. 2021 Dec;7(12):e08453 [PMID: 34869933]
  15. Res Int Bus Finance. 2020 Dec;54:101249 [PMID: 34170989]
  16. Heliyon. 2022 Mar 31;8(4):e09215 [PMID: 35399378]
  17. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Nov;37:101748 [PMID: 32895607]
  18. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101701 [PMID: 32837381]
  19. Financ Res Lett. 2022 May;46:102350 [PMID: 35431683]
  20. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534 [PMID: 32087114]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pandemicvolatilitymarketAsia-PacificregionstockCovid-19marketsresponsesherdeffectsperiodfindingscontrolmeasuresToda-YamamotocausalitytestpanelVARResponsesappearchangetimeRecentmightdiffermentalitytendsbecomeimmunitystudyrevisitspandemic'scountries'past25monthsPrimarilyexaminechangesimpactsfirst2020secondJanuary2021-January2022indicateimplementinghelpsreducecountrylevelsnewcasesdramaticallyfadingsince2021impulseresponsefunctionsestimationalsousedrobustnessanalysisBasedappearscurrentmaylongerblamedStockpandemic:NewevidenceGARCHmodelsGovernmentMarketPanel

Similar Articles

Cited By