Psychological capital has a positive correlation with humanistic care ability among nurses.

Xiaohong Liu, Cuiping Li, Xiaoting Yan, Bingqing Shi
Author Information
  1. Xiaohong Liu: School of Medicine, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
  2. Cuiping Li: School of Medicine, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
  3. Xiaoting Yan: Central Sterile Supply Department, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
  4. Bingqing Shi: School of Medicine, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.

Abstract

Objective: With the improvement in health awareness, humanistic care ability of nurses has become a focus of public attention. The aim of the study was to confirm the relationship between psychological capital and humanistic care ability of nurses, and to provide suggestions on improving the humanistic care ability of nurses.
Methods: A cross-section survey was conducted. Three hundred thirty-nine nurses were recruited from a tertiary general hospital in Taizhou, China. Psychological capital and humanistic care ability were measured using a self-reported questionnaire. Correlation analysis and stepwise multiple regression analysis were performed to analyze the correlation between psychological capital and humanistic care ability.
Results: The psychological capital and humanistic care ability scores were 91.57 ± 13.96 and 189.08 ± 20.37, respectively. Differences in psychological capital scores across professional titles ( = 4.88,  = 0.01), departments ( = 3.69,  < 0.001), years of work ( = 4.68,  < 0.001), and marital status ( = 3.25,  < 0.001) were statistically significant. There were statistical differences for the humanistic care ability scores among nurses based on marital status ( = 0.01). The total psychological capital scores and the four sub-dimensions scores were positively correlated with the humanistic care ability scores among nurses. Self-efficacy was the main predictor of nurses' humanistic care ability.
Conclusion: Psychological capital positively affected the humanistic care ability of nurses. Self-efficacy was the main predictor of humanistic care ability. Nursing managers can formulate strategies from the perspective of positive psychology to improve humanistic care ability of nurses.

Keywords

References

  1. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;58(5):12-6 [PMID: 22024799]
  2. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2006;38(1):71-9 [PMID: 16579327]
  3. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jul;83:75-82 [PMID: 29702357]
  4. J Nurs Manag. 2021 Nov 19;: [PMID: 34798681]
  5. Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Aug 18;11(3):344-350 [PMID: 34660230]
  6. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104253 [PMID: 31706205]
  7. J Adv Nurs. 2021 May;77(5):2374-2385 [PMID: 33594687]
  8. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 24;13:965945 [PMID: 36092081]
  9. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;15(1):17-28 [PMID: 20063956]
  10. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jul 18;75(suppl 3):e20210942 [PMID: 35858010]
  11. Work. 2022;72(3):1007-1014 [PMID: 35634826]
  12. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;12(2):82-86 [PMID: 35754669]
  13. Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;10:786470 [PMID: 35570927]
  14. PLoS One. 2015 May 19;10(5):e0126708 [PMID: 25993110]
  15. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2022 Jul 11;:27527530221099899 [PMID: 35815893]
  16. Nurs Health Sci. 2021 Mar;23(1):237-244 [PMID: 33382147]
  17. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Dec 9;: [PMID: 34888883]
  18. Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Nov;24(6):381-386 [PMID: 30478867]
  19. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;44:101428 [PMID: 34157494]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 19;16(14): [PMID: 31331046]
  21. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 18;17(16): [PMID: 32824724]
  22. Nurs Ethics. 2022 May;29(3):608-620 [PMID: 35144499]
  23. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021 Oct 22;26(6):508-514 [PMID: 34900649]
  24. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):196-207 [PMID: 32141649]
  25. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 24;58(2): [PMID: 35208495]
  26. J Adv Nurs. 1999 Dec;30(6):1388-95 [PMID: 10583650]
  27. Health Psychol. 2017 Mar;36(3):192-205 [PMID: 27929332]
  28. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Oct;32(19):3244-3250 [PMID: 29618234]
  29. Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:896415 [PMID: 35795450]
  30. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jan;27(1):52-65 [PMID: 30238670]
  31. Appl Nurs Res. 2019 Aug;48:37-44 [PMID: 31266606]
  32. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):9-13 [PMID: 28444067]
  33. J Relig Health. 2021 Feb;60(1):134-152 [PMID: 31894520]
  34. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:1-23 [PMID: 30525996]
  35. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Mar;31:100695 [PMID: 35085930]
  36. Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:661278 [PMID: 34621205]
  37. Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3591-3599 [PMID: 34017540]
  38. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 27;19(5): [PMID: 35270478]
  39. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103997 [PMID: 34218048]
  40. Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:722214 [PMID: 35712172]
  41. J Adv Nurs. 2017 Nov;73(11):2577-2586 [PMID: 28543602]
  42. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Feb;35(2):310-4 [PMID: 25456256]
  43. Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 11;12:566293 [PMID: 33643121]
  44. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 16;12:596428 [PMID: 34867493]
  45. J Nurs Manag. 2021 Sep;29(6):1713-1722 [PMID: 33682206]
  46. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):839 [PMID: 35773661]
  47. Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020957114 [PMID: 32900271]
  48. J Patient Exp. 2021 Nov 26;8:23743735211056432 [PMID: 34869836]
  49. Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2449-2458 [PMID: 34765468]
  50. BMC Nurs. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):255 [PMID: 34930206]
  51. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Mar;86:104315 [PMID: 31896034]
  52. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2020 Jun 15;31(2):167-178 [PMID: 32526000]
  53. Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jan 31;2022:8435530 [PMID: 35685539]
  54. Psychiatr Hung. 2022;37(2):124-132 [PMID: 35582866]
  55. Technol Health Care. 2019;27(2):195-208 [PMID: 30562911]
  56. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):525 [PMID: 35922834]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0humanisticcareabilitynursescapitalpsychologicalscoresPsychological< 0001amongpositiveanalysiscorrelation = 4 = 001 = 3maritalstatuspositivelySelf-efficacymainpredictorpsychologyObjective:improvementhealthawarenessbecomefocuspublicattentionaimstudyconfirmrelationshipprovidesuggestionsimprovingMethods:cross-sectionsurveyconductedThreehundredthirty-ninerecruitedtertiarygeneralhospitalTaizhouChinameasuredusingself-reportedquestionnaireCorrelationstepwisemultipleregressionperformedanalyzeResults:9157 ± 139618908 ± 2037respectivelyDifferencesacrossprofessionaltitles88departments69yearswork6825statisticallysignificantstatisticaldifferencesbasedtotalfoursub-dimensionscorrelatednurses'Conclusion:affectedNursingmanagerscanformulatestrategiesperspectiveimprovenurseself-efficacytraining

Similar Articles

Cited By