Association of Mu opioid receptor (A118G) and BDNF (G196A) polymorphisms with rehabilitation-induced cortical inhibition and analgesic response in chronic osteoarthritis pain.

Fernanda de Toledo Gonçalves, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Ingrid Rebello-Sanchez, Luis Castelo-Branco, Paulo S de Melo, Joao Parente, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Isabela Firigato, Anne Victorio Pessotto, Marta Imamura, Marcel Simis, Linamara Battistella, Felipe Fregni
Author Information
  1. Fernanda de Toledo Gonçalves: Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina Social e do Trabalho, Laboratório de Imunohematologia e Hematologia Forense (LIM40), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC da FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  2. Kevin Pacheco-Barrios: Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  3. Ingrid Rebello-Sanchez: Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  4. Luis Castelo-Branco: Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  5. Paulo S de Melo: Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  6. Joao Parente: Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  7. Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas: Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  8. Isabela Firigato: Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina Social e do Trabalho, Laboratório de Imunohematologia e Hematologia Forense (LIM40), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC da FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  9. Anne Victorio Pessotto: Departamento de Medicina Legal, Ética Médica e Medicina Social e do Trabalho, Laboratório de Imunohematologia e Hematologia Forense (LIM40), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HC da FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  10. Marta Imamura: Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  11. Marcel Simis: Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  12. Linamara Battistella: Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  13. Felipe Fregni: Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Abstract

Background/objective: Chronic pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of global disability. New biomarkers are needed to improve treatment allocation, and genetic polymorphisms are promising candidates.
Method: We aimed to assess the association of OPRM1 (A118G and C17T) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF [G196A]) polymorphisms with pain-related outcomes and motor cortex excitability metrics (measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation) in 113 knee OA patients with chronic pain. We performed adjusted multivariate regression analyses to compare carriers versus non-carriers in terms of clinical and neurophysiological characteristics at baseline, and treatment response (pain reduction and increased cortical inhibitory tonus) after rehabilitation.
Results: Compared to non-carriers, participants with polymorphisms on both OPRM1 (A118G) and BDNF (G196A) genes were less likely to improve pain after rehabilitation (85 and 72% fewer odds of improvement, respectively). Likewise, both carriers of OPRM1 polymorphisms (A118G and C17T) were also less likely to improve cortical inhibition (short intracortical inhibition [SICI], and intracortical facilitation [ICF], respectively). While pain and cortical inhibition improvement did not correlate in the total sample, the presence of OPRM1 (A118G) and BDNF (G196A) polymorphisms moderated this relationship.
Conclusions: These results underscore the promising role of combining genetic and neurophysiological markers to endotype the treatment response in this population.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 14;11(1):24011 [PMID: 34907209]
  2. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):1215 [PMID: 3344216]
  3. Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):35-40 [PMID: 30495997]
  4. Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2310-2322 [PMID: 32176286]
  5. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Apr 21;24(4):256-313 [PMID: 32710772]
  6. Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;20(8):916-30 [PMID: 25824305]
  7. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015 Apr;19(4):565-76 [PMID: 25519921]
  8. Brain Inj. 2014;28(10):1270-6 [PMID: 24841536]
  9. Neuroscience. 2016 Dec 3;338:36-62 [PMID: 27143481]
  10. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 26;5(10):e13641 [PMID: 21049025]
  11. Neurochem Res. 2010 May;35(5):830-4 [PMID: 20119637]
  12. Front Neural Circuits. 2018 May 16;12:37 [PMID: 29867371]
  13. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;39(1):269-274 [PMID: 31446538]
  14. Epilepsia. 2014 Feb;55(2):362-9 [PMID: 24417206]
  15. BMJ. 2012 Jul 30;345:e4934 [PMID: 22846469]
  16. Neuroscience. 2016 Nov 12;336:114-122 [PMID: 27600949]
  17. J Neurosci. 2007 May 30;27(22):5903-14 [PMID: 17537961]
  18. J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 15;21(12):4469-77 [PMID: 11404434]
  19. Mol Pain. 2016 May 04;12: [PMID: 27145806]
  20. Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 09;12:695406 [PMID: 34434160]
  21. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):92-6 [PMID: 25241287]
  22. Brain Behav. 2018 Dec;8(12):e01155 [PMID: 30417982]
  23. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 May 1;108(3):172-82 [PMID: 20074870]
  24. J Biol Chem. 2005 Sep 23;280(38):32618-24 [PMID: 16046395]
  25. Front Neurol. 2020 Jul 30;11:720 [PMID: 32849197]
  26. Pain Pract. 2020 Mar;20(3):277-288 [PMID: 31665822]
  27. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21 [PMID: 18055266]
  28. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:9-19 [PMID: 26330656]
  29. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003 Jan;107(1):69-72 [PMID: 12558545]
  30. Sports Health. 2020 Mar/Apr;12(2):200-206 [PMID: 31850826]
  31. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107 [PMID: 25797650]
  32. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Mar;40(4):957-65 [PMID: 25308352]
  33. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 5;23(1):e21542 [PMID: 33399542]
  34. Neurosci Lett. 2017 Aug 10;655:7-13 [PMID: 28648456]
  35. J Physiol. 2017 Jul 1;595(13):4141-4150 [PMID: 28369946]
  36. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):51-9 [PMID: 25547768]
  37. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 May;117(5):1037-46 [PMID: 16564206]
  38. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Dec;16(6):518-24 [PMID: 23054978]
  39. Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(1):86-93 [PMID: 16489434]
  40. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Aug;109(4):321-30 [PMID: 9751295]
  41. Exp Brain Res. 2014 Dec;232(12):3991-9 [PMID: 25183161]
  42. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57690 [PMID: 23451258]
  43. Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):187-99 [PMID: 17640522]
  44. Neurology. 2003 Aug 26;61(4):515-9 [PMID: 12939426]
  45. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Aug;39(9):2142-52 [PMID: 24622471]
  46. Exp Brain Res. 2020 Feb;238(2):321-332 [PMID: 31907554]
  47. Prog Neurobiol. 2018 Oct;169:91-134 [PMID: 29981393]
  48. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Nov;132(11):2827-2839 [PMID: 34592560]
  49. PLoS Genet. 2008 Jul 25;4(7):e1000086 [PMID: 18654615]
  50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463-7 [PMID: 271968]
  51. Neuroreport. 2003 Mar 24;14(4):569-72 [PMID: 12657887]
  52. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 15;10:357 [PMID: 27471458]
  53. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:387-97 [PMID: 24112911]
  54. Neuroscience. 2012 Mar 15;205:178-84 [PMID: 22240251]
  55. Cell. 2003 Jan 24;112(2):257-69 [PMID: 12553913]
  56. Expert Rev Neurother. 2020 Apr;20(4):401-412 [PMID: 32130037]
  57. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 Mar 15;114(6):725-33 [PMID: 23271699]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painpolymorphismsA118GOPRM1BDNFcorticalinhibitionimprovetreatmentresponseG196AChronicosteoarthritisOAgeneticpromisingC17Texcitabilitychroniccarriersnon-carriersneurophysiologicalrehabilitationlesslikelyimprovementrespectivelyintracorticalBackground/objective:dueprevalentcauseglobaldisabilityNewbiomarkersneededallocationcandidatesMethod:aimedassessassociationbrain-derivedneurotrophicfactor[G196A]pain-relatedoutcomesmotorcortexmetricsmeasuredtranscranialmagneticstimulation113kneepatientsperformedadjustedmultivariateregressionanalysescompareversustermsclinicalcharacteristicsbaselinereductionincreasedinhibitorytonusResults:Comparedparticipantsgenes8572%feweroddsLikewisealsoshort[SICI]facilitation[ICF]correlatetotalsamplepresencemoderatedrelationshipConclusions:resultsunderscorerolecombiningmarkersendotypepopulationAssociationMuopioidreceptorrehabilitation-inducedanalgesicCorticalOsteoarthritisPolymorphism

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)