Transcriptomic analysis provides insight into defensive strategies in response to continuous cropping in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plants.

Peng Chen, He-Qin Li, Xing-Yue Li, Xian-Hong Zhou, Xiu-Xia Zhang, An-Sheng Zhang, Qi-Zhi Liu
Author Information
  1. Peng Chen: Key Laboratory of Natural Enemies Insects, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shandong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center on Biocontrol of Crop Diseases and Insect Pest, Institute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 250100, Jinan, China.
  2. He-Qin Li: Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Dryland Technology, College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, 266109, Qingdao, China.
  3. Xing-Yue Li: Institute of Plant Protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Science, 610066, Chengdu, China.
  4. Xian-Hong Zhou: Key Laboratory of Natural Enemies Insects, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shandong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center on Biocontrol of Crop Diseases and Insect Pest, Institute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 250100, Jinan, China.
  5. Xiu-Xia Zhang: Key Laboratory of Natural Enemies Insects, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shandong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center on Biocontrol of Crop Diseases and Insect Pest, Institute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 250100, Jinan, China.
  6. An-Sheng Zhang: Key Laboratory of Natural Enemies Insects, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shandong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center on Biocontrol of Crop Diseases and Insect Pest, Institute of Plant Protection, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 250100, Jinan, China. zhangansheng2003@163.com.
  7. Qi-Zhi Liu: Laboratory of Entomology and Nematology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, 100193, Beijing, China. lqzzyx163@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strawberries are an important economic fruit crop world-wide. In strawberry cultivation, continuous cropping (CC) can seriously threaten yield and quality. However, our understanding of the gene expression changes in response to CC and during subsequent defense processes is limited. In this study, we analyzed the impact of CC on the transcriptome of strawberry roots using RNA-Seq technology to elucidate the effect of CC and the subsequent molecular changes.
RESULTS: We found that CC significantly affects the growth of strawberry plants. The transcriptome analysis identified 136 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 49 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated DEGs. A Gene Ontology (GO) analysis indicated that the up-regulated DEGs were mainly assigned to defense-related GO terms, and most down-regulated DEGs were assigned to nutrient-related GO terms. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed that the responsive DEGs were classified in a large number of important biological pathways, such as phenylalanine metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, glutathione metabolism and plant-pathogen interaction. We also found that four WRKY transcription factors and three peroxidase genes involved in plant defense pathways were up-regulated in the roots of strawberry plants subjected to CC.
CONCLUSION: Several unigenes involved in plant defense processes, such as CNGCs, WRKY transcription factors, PR1, and peroxidase genes with highly variable expression levels between non-CC and CC treatments may be involved in the regulation of CC in strawberry. These results indicate that strawberry roots reallocate development resources to defense mechanisms in response to CC. This study will further deepen our understanding of the fundamental regulatory mechanisms of strawberry resource reallocation in response to CC.

Keywords

References

  1. Mol Genet Genomics. 2012 Jun;287(6):495-513 [PMID: 22570076]
  2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Feb;1819(2):120-8 [PMID: 21964328]
  3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1229-D1236 [PMID: 28977518]
  4. Immunol Rev. 2004 Apr;198:267-84 [PMID: 15199968]
  5. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:781-803 [PMID: 16669782]
  6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D109-14 [PMID: 22080510]
  7. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8 [PMID: 18546601]
  8. BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):385 [PMID: 32831040]
  9. Tree Physiol. 2006 Nov;26(11):1405-12 [PMID: 16877325]
  10. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Feb;60(6):665-70 [PMID: 12664144]
  11. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Oct;7(5):506-11 [PMID: 15337092]
  12. DNA Res. 2014;21(2):169-81 [PMID: 24282021]
  13. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;14(2):194-9 [PMID: 12732320]
  14. Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 10;9(1):8423 [PMID: 31182725]
  15. Gene. 2015 Jan 10;554(2):205-14 [PMID: 25445290]
  16. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D121-D126 [PMID: 29036693]
  17. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Oct;7(5):491-8 [PMID: 15337090]
  18. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46420 [PMID: 23071565]
  19. BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):5 [PMID: 31900117]
  20. BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Mar 26;11:53 [PMID: 21439075]
  21. J Theor Biol. 2019 Feb 7;462:158-170 [PMID: 30412698]
  22. Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14 [PMID: 20132535]
  23. Trends Plant Sci. 2000 May;5(5):199-206 [PMID: 10785665]
  24. Plant Cell Rep. 2017 Jun;36(6):859-875 [PMID: 28275853]
  25. Plant Physiol. 1991 Jun;96(2):577-83 [PMID: 16668224]
  26. Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 23;7:1929 [PMID: 28066482]
  27. Genome Res. 1997 Oct;7(10):986-95 [PMID: 9331369]
  28. Mol Plant. 2014 Aug;7(8):1267-1287 [PMID: 24777989]
  29. Plant Physiol. 2001 Jan;125(1):29-32 [PMID: 11154289]
  30. BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):68 [PMID: 30744569]
  31. Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):621-8 [PMID: 18516045]
  32. Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 28;13:839494 [PMID: 35295291]
  33. J Plant Physiol. 2019 Oct;241:153035 [PMID: 31491601]
  34. Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 1;21(19):3787-93 [PMID: 15817693]
  35. Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 05;12:627569 [PMID: 33746921]
  36. BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):788 [PMID: 27717312]
  37. Mol Plant. 2010 Jan;3(1):2-20 [PMID: 20035037]
  38. Trends Plant Sci. 2010 May;15(5):247-58 [PMID: 20304701]
  39. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 10;6:30466 [PMID: 27506379]
  40. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 May;80(2):469-78 [PMID: 22273443]

Grants

  1. ZR202102260381/Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation
  2. CXGC2021B13/Agricultural scientific and technological innovation project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  3. CXGC2021B13/Agricultural scientific and technological innovation project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  4. 2014BAD20B01/National Science and Technology of China

MeSH Term

Fragaria
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Glutathione
Peroxidases
Phenylalanine
Starch
Sucrose
Transcription Factors
Transcriptome

Chemicals

Transcription Factors
Phenylalanine
Sucrose
Starch
Peroxidases
Glutathione

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CCstrawberryDEGsresponsedefenseanalysiscroppingrootsplantsgenesup-regulatedGOmetabolismWRKYtranscriptioninvolvedimportantcontinuousunderstandingexpressionchangessubsequentprocessesstudytranscriptomefounddown-regulatedassignedtermspathwaysfactorsperoxidaseplantmechanismsBACKGROUND:Strawberrieseconomicfruitcropworld-widecultivationcanseriouslythreatenyieldqualityHowevergenelimitedanalyzedimpactusingRNA-SeqtechnologyelucidateeffectmolecularRESULTS:significantlyaffectsgrowthidentified136differentiallyexpressedincluding4987GeneOntologyindicatedmainlydefense-relatednutrient-relatedKyotoEncyclopediaGenesGenomesKEGGrevealedresponsiveclassifiedlargenumberbiologicalphenylalaninestarchsucrosephenylpropanoidbiosynthesisglutathioneplant-pathogeninteractionalsofourthreesubjectedCONCLUSION:SeveralunigenesCNGCsPR1highlyvariablelevelsnon-CCtreatmentsmayregulationresultsindicatereallocatedevelopmentresourceswilldeepenfundamentalregulatoryresourcereallocationTranscriptomicprovidesinsightdefensivestrategiesFragaria×ananassaDuchContinuousPeroxidaseSalicylicacidfactor

Similar Articles

Cited By