The interRAI CHESS scale is comparable to the palliative performance scale in predicting 90-day mortality in a palliative home care population.

Nicole Williams, Kirsten Hermans, Joachim Cohen, Anja Declercq, Ahmed Jakda, James Downar, Dawn M Guthrie, John P Hirdes
Author Information
  1. Nicole Williams: Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, Canada. nwilliams@wlu.ca.
  2. Kirsten Hermans: LUCAS - Center for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8 box, 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  3. Joachim Cohen: End-of-life Care Research Group, University of Brussels (VUB) and Ghent University (UGent), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
  4. Anja Declercq: LUCAS - Center for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Minderbroedersstraat 8 box, 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  5. Ahmed Jakda: Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main Street West, Hamilton, Canada.
  6. James Downar: Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  7. Dawn M Guthrie: Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, Canada.
  8. John P Hirdes: School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognostic accuracy is important throughout all stages of the illness trajectory as it has implications for the timing of important conversations and decisions around care. Physicians often tend to over-estimate prognosis and may under-recognize palliative care (PC) needs. It is therefore essential that all relevant stakeholders have as much information available to them as possible when estimating prognosis.
AIMS: The current study examined whether the interRAI Changes in Health, End-Stage Disease, Signs and Symptoms (CHESS) Scale is a good predictor of mortality in a known PC population and to see how it compares to the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) in predicting 90-day mortality.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from 2011 to 2018 on 80,261 unique individuals receiving palliative home care and assessed with both the interRAI Palliative Care instrument and the PPS. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between the main outcome, 90-day mortality and were then replicated for a secondary outcome examining the number of nursing visits. Comparison of survival time was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
RESULTS: The CHESS Scale was an acceptable predictor of 90-day mortality (c-statistic = 0.68; p < 0.0001) and was associated with the number of nursing days (c = 0.61; p < 0.0001) and had comparable performance to the PPS (c = 0.69; p < 0.0001). The CHESS Scale performed slightly better than the PPS in predicting 90-day mortality when combined with other interRAI PC items (c = 0.72; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The interRAI CHESS Scale is an additional decision-support tool available to clinicians that can be used alongside the PPS when estimating prognosis. This additional information can assist with the development of care plans, discussions, and referrals to specialist PC teams.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 20;20(1):165 [PMID: 34666732]
  2. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911146 [PMID: 31517959]
  3. Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jul 21;17(4):2 [PMID: 28970760]
  4. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):971-979 [PMID: 31253736]
  5. BMC Geriatr. 2014 May 28;14:70 [PMID: 24884813]
  6. Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Jul-Sep;22(3):252-7 [PMID: 27559252]
  7. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):438-443 [PMID: 30573437]
  8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Oct 30;17(1):150 [PMID: 29084534]
  9. Age Ageing. 2008 Jan;37(1):51-6 [PMID: 18033777]
  10. CMAJ. 2021 Jul 5;193(26):E997-E1005 [PMID: 34226263]
  11. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 01;13:457 [PMID: 24176093]
  12. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1425-1431.e1 [PMID: 30956146]
  13. BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Feb 29;15:24 [PMID: 26924601]
  14. J Palliat Med. 2005 Jun;8(3):503-9 [PMID: 15992191]
  15. Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;55(11):736-40 [PMID: 21070702]
  16. BMC Palliat Care. 2021 May 26;20(1):74 [PMID: 34039322]
  17. Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 02;13:787463 [PMID: 35586405]
  18. Health Serv Insights. 2022 Mar 25;15:11786329221078124 [PMID: 35360089]
  19. Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Spring;21(1):33-9 [PMID: 18814426]
  20. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Oct;38(4):483-95 [PMID: 19699607]
  21. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 20;11:86 [PMID: 21507213]
  22. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8 [PMID: 17947786]
  23. Curr Oncol. 2021 Apr 28;28(3):1641-1651 [PMID: 33924801]
  24. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 17;10:926 [PMID: 32076412]
  25. Br J Surg. 2013 Dec;100(13):1810-7 [PMID: 24227369]
  26. ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):371-378 [PMID: 30835970]
  27. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jul;38(1):134-44 [PMID: 19171459]
  28. JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1063-4 [PMID: 26348755]
  29. Med Care. 2000 Dec;38(12):1184-90 [PMID: 11186297]
  30. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Feb 26;13:27 [PMID: 23442258]
  31. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 10;9(6):e99066 [PMID: 24914546]
  32. Age Ageing. 2010 Nov;39(6):755-8 [PMID: 20858672]
  33. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e015904 [PMID: 29362244]
  34. JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2734-40 [PMID: 15187055]
  35. Am J Surg. 2017 Apr;213(4):778-784 [PMID: 28160967]
  36. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999 Nov;54(11):M546-53 [PMID: 10619316]
  37. J Palliat Care. 1996 Spring;12(1):5-11 [PMID: 8857241]
  38. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42 [PMID: 20818875]
  39. J Palliat Med. 2010 Jul;13(7):837-40 [PMID: 20636154]
  40. J Palliat Med. 2005 Jun;8(3):492-502 [PMID: 15992190]
  41. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 17;13:710569 [PMID: 35370860]
  42. J Palliat Med. 2007 Feb;10(1):111-7 [PMID: 17298259]
  43. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Oct;62:90-9 [PMID: 27468117]
  44. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 29;9:71 [PMID: 19402891]
  45. Age Ageing. 2006 Jul;35(4):329-31 [PMID: 16788076]
  46. Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;116(24):5767-76 [PMID: 21136579]
  47. BMC Palliat Care. 2008 Aug 04;7:10 [PMID: 18680590]
  48. Can J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;37(11):1767-1774 [PMID: 34303783]
  49. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jan;51(1):96-100 [PMID: 12534853]
  50. BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Dec 15;13(1):58 [PMID: 25550682]
  51. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0161407 [PMID: 27560380]
  52. Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jun;19(3):308-12 [PMID: 19221020]
  53. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139 [PMID: 31517962]
  54. Palliat Support Care. 2012 Sep;10(3):155-63 [PMID: 22436557]
  55. Int J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 23;155(1):75-80 [PMID: 21292334]
  56. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 5;8(4):e021147 [PMID: 29626051]
  57. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 30;8:277 [PMID: 19115991]
  58. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;20(12):1045-56 [PMID: 21952123]
  59. BMC Geriatr. 2010 Sep 20;10:67 [PMID: 20854670]
  60. Gerontologist. 2001 Apr;41(2):173-9 [PMID: 11327482]
  61. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 30;17(3):e0266160 [PMID: 35353856]
  62. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):1017-24 [PMID: 9256857]
  63. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003 May-Jun;20(3):211-9 [PMID: 12785043]
  64. CMAJ Open. 2020 Dec 1;8(4):E796-E809 [PMID: 33262118]
  65. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 19;6(9):e012340 [PMID: 27645556]

Grants

  1. 156359/CIHR

MeSH Term

Home Care Services
Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing
Humans
Palliative Care
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careinterRAImortalityCHESSScalePPS90-daypalliativePCp < 00001prognosispredictingusedc = 0importantinformationavailableestimatingstudyexaminedpredictorpopulationPalliativehomeoutcomenumbernursingsurvivalcomparableperformanceadditionalcanscaleBACKGROUND:PrognosticaccuracythroughoutstagesillnesstrajectoryimplicationstimingconversationsdecisionsaroundPhysiciansoftentendover-estimatemayunder-recognizeneedsthereforeessentialrelevantstakeholdersmuchpossibleAIMS:currentwhetherChangesHealthEnd-StageDiseaseSignsSymptomsgoodknownseecomparesPerformanceMETHODS:retrospectivecohortdata2011201880261uniqueindividualsreceivingassessedCareinstrumentLogisticregressionmodelsevaluaterelationshipmainreplicatedsecondaryexaminingvisitsComparisontimeusingKaplan-MeiercurvesRESULTS:acceptablec-statistic = 068associateddays6169performedslightlybettercombineditems72CONCLUSION:decision-supporttoolcliniciansalongsideassistdevelopmentplansdiscussionsreferralsspecialistteamsAssessmentEnd-of-lifeHomePrognosis

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)