Identifying Key Stressors Driving Biological Impairment in Freshwater Streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA.

Rosemary M Fanelli, Matthew J Cashman, Aaron J Porter
Author Information
  1. Rosemary M Fanelli: U.S. Geological Survey, South Atlantic Water Science Center, Raleigh, NC, USA. rfanelli@usgs.gov.
  2. Matthew J Cashman: U.S. Geological Survey, Maryland-D.C.-Delaware Water Science Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  3. Aaron J Porter: U.S. Geological Survey, Virginia-West Virginia Water Science Center, Richmond, VA, USA.

Abstract

Biological communities in freshwater streams are often impaired by multiple stressors (e.g., flow or water quality) originating from anthropogenic activities such as urbanization, agriculture, or energy extraction. Restoration efforts in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA seek to improve biological conditions in 10% of freshwater tributaries and to protect the biological integrity of existing healthy watersheds. To achieve these goals, resource managers need to better understand which stressors are most likely driving biological impairment. Our study addressed this knowledge gap through two approaches: 1) reviewing and synthesizing published multi-stressor studies, and 2) examining 303(d) listed impairments linked to biological impairment as identified by jurisdiction regulatory agencies (the states within the watershed and the District of Columbia). Results identified geomorphology (i.e., physical habitat), salinity, and toxic contaminants as important for explaining variability in benthic community metrics in the literature review. Geomorphology (i.e., physical habitat and sediment), salinity, and nutrients were the most reported stressors in the jurisdictional impairment analysis. Salinity is likely a major stressor in urban and mining settings, whereas geomorphology was commonly reported in agricultural settings. Toxic contaminants, such as pesticides, were rarely measured; more research is needed to quantify the extent of their effects in the region. Flow alteration was also highlighted as an important urban stressor in the literature review but was rarely measured in the literature or reported by jurisdictions as a cause of impairment. These results can be used to prioritize stressor monitoring by managers, and to improve stressor identification methods for identifying causes of biological impairment.

Keywords

References

  1. Ecol Lett. 2008 Dec;11(12):1304-15 [PMID: 19046359]
  2. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Feb;32(2):277-87 [PMID: 23147750]
  3. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1472-1485 [PMID: 30743940]
  4. Environ Manage. 2014 Oct;54(4):919-33 [PMID: 24990807]
  5. Water Res. 2018 Mar 1;130:69-78 [PMID: 29202343]
  6. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug;4(8):1060-1068 [PMID: 32541802]
  7. J Environ Qual. 2013 Nov;42(6):1838-51 [PMID: 25602424]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 15;800:149350 [PMID: 34399326]
  9. Hydrol Process. 2020 Jan;34(2):387-403 [PMID: 32063664]
  10. Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jan 18;56(2):845-861 [PMID: 34978800]
  11. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Sep 2;48(17):10071-8 [PMID: 25046800]
  12. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 15;573:1079-1088 [PMID: 27632785]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2020 May 13;287(1926):20200421 [PMID: 32370677]
  14. Ecol Appl. 2015 Jul;25(5):1397-419 [PMID: 26485964]
  15. Water Res. 2018 Aug 1;139:381-394 [PMID: 29673937]
  16. Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Feb 7;190(3):120 [PMID: 29411118]
  17. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45814 [PMID: 23029257]
  18. Environ Pollut. 2003;123(1):1-13 [PMID: 12663200]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 2;110(27):11039-43 [PMID: 23776226]
  20. Environ Monit Assess. 2004 Aug-Sep;96(1-3):203-20 [PMID: 15327159]
  21. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 1;793:148453 [PMID: 34182445]
  22. Environ Pollut. 2021 Dec 15;291:118092 [PMID: 34520947]
  23. Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Apr 18;51(8):4165-4172 [PMID: 28324648]
  24. Ecotoxicology. 2007 Apr;16(3):311-6 [PMID: 17253158]
  25. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Dec 3;374(1764): [PMID: 30509923]
  26. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 23;9(1):19685 [PMID: 31873108]
  27. Water Res. 2021 Aug 1;201:117262 [PMID: 34118650]
  28. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 20;774:145687 [PMID: 33609846]
  29. Dis Aquat Organ. 2021 Feb 11;143:79-100 [PMID: 33570042]
  30. Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jan 2;53(1):452-462 [PMID: 30532975]
  31. Ecol Lett. 2018 Nov;21(11):1629-1638 [PMID: 30141251]
  32. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 25;745:141285 [PMID: 32943215]
  33. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Mar 1;508:488-97 [PMID: 25514764]
  34. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2015 Apr;11(2):188-94 [PMID: 25376941]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 23;115(4):E574-E583 [PMID: 29311318]
  36. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009 Mar;82(3):270-4 [PMID: 19009223]
  37. Ecol Appl. 1991 Feb;1(1):66-84 [PMID: 27755684]
  38. Aquat Toxicol. 2017 Sep;190:62-69 [PMID: 28692867]
  39. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:961-971 [PMID: 28830056]
  40. Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jan 21;54(2):778-789 [PMID: 31845802]
  41. Ecol Appl. 2011 Sep;21(6):1932-49 [PMID: 21939035]
  42. Environ Manage. 2017 Oct;60(4):598-614 [PMID: 28667407]
  43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 18;117(7):3670-3677 [PMID: 32015108]
  44. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 15;787:147147 [PMID: 33994194]
  45. Environ Manage. 2021 Jun;67(6):1171-1185 [PMID: 33710388]
  46. J R Soc Interface. 2015 Sep 6;12(110):0435 [PMID: 26311313]
  47. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49873 [PMID: 23185471]
  48. Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 24;789:147985 [PMID: 34323823]
  49. Sci Total Environ. 2012 Feb 15;417-418:1-12 [PMID: 22264919]
  50. Environ Manage. 2002 Oct;30(4):492-507 [PMID: 12481916]
  51. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 May;30(5):1127-38 [PMID: 21312245]
  52. Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2144-63 [PMID: 23387116]
  53. Water Environ Res. 2009 Feb;81(2):150-9 [PMID: 19323285]
  54. Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 15;717:137070 [PMID: 32062257]
  55. Environ Res Lett. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):035017-35017 [PMID: 34017359]
  56. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 May;39(6):1219-1232 [PMID: 32128866]
  57. Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jun;188(6):345 [PMID: 27170357]

MeSH Term

Animals
Rivers
Environmental Monitoring
Bays
Fresh Water
Water Quality
Ecosystem
Invertebrates

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0biologicalimpairmentstressorBiologicalstressorsecontaminantsliteraturereportedfreshwaterqualityChesapeakeBaywatershedUSAimprovemanagerslikelyidentifiedgeomorphologyiphysicalhabitatsalinityimportantreviewGeomorphologyurbansettingsToxicrarelymeasuredcommunitiesstreamsoftenimpairedmultiplegflowwateroriginatinganthropogenicactivitiesurbanizationagricultureenergyextractionRestorationeffortsseekconditions10%tributariesprotectintegrityexistinghealthywatershedsachievegoalsresourceneedbetterunderstanddrivingstudyaddressedknowledgegaptwoapproaches:1reviewingsynthesizingpublishedmulti-stressorstudies2examining303dlistedimpairmentslinkedjurisdictionregulatoryagenciesstateswithinDistrictColumbiaResultstoxicexplainingvariabilitybenthiccommunitymetricssedimentnutrientsjurisdictionalanalysisSalinitymajorminingwhereascommonlyagriculturalpesticidesresearchneededquantifyextenteffectsregionFlowalterationalsohighlightedjurisdictionscauseresultscanusedprioritizemonitoringidentificationmethodsidentifyingcausesIdentifyingKeyStressorsDrivingImpairmentFreshwaterStreamsWatershedassessmentMacroinvertebrateStressorWater

Similar Articles

Cited By