Exposure to e-cigarette advertising and provaping websites, and the social acceptability of their use among nicotine users.

Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Lizeth Cruz-Jimenez, Rosibel Rodriguez-Bola��os, Edna Arillo-Santill��n, James F Thrasher
Author Information
  1. Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez: Center for Evaluation and Survey Research Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Center for Evaluation and Survey Research, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
  2. Katia Gallegos-Carrillo: Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit Mexican Institute of Social Security Cuernavaca Mexico Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
  3. Lizeth Cruz-Jimenez: Center for Evaluation and Survey Research Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Center for Evaluation and Survey Research, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
  4. Rosibel Rodriguez-Bola��os: Population Health Research Center Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Population Health Research Center, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
  5. Edna Arillo-Santill��n: Population Health Research Center Mexican National Institute of Public Health Cuernavaca Mexico Population Health Research Center, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
  6. James F Thrasher: Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina Columbia, SC United States of America Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of exposure to Internet communications on and advertising of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and their association with perceptions of the social acceptability of e-cigarettes in Mexico.
Methods: Data were analyzed from eight surveys (2018-2021) of an online sample of Mexican adult (> 18 years) smokers and dual users (of combustible and electronic cigarettes). Self-reported exposure to e-cigarette advertising across various marketing channels was assessed, as well as visits to e-cigarette websites. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between perceptions of the social acceptability of e-cigarette use and level of advertising exposure and visits to e-cigarette websites.
Results: The Internet and outside e-cigarette stores were where exposure to advertising most occurred, as reported by 47.4% and 46.8% of respondents, respectively. Respondents who noticed e-cigarette advertisements on the Internet (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.43, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.25, 1.63), outside e-cigarette stores (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.14, 1.50), and in temporary outlets (adjusted OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01, 1.34), and those who visited e-cigarette websites (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.25, 1.76) were more likely to perceive e-cigarettes as socially acceptable. Noticing advertisements across more channels was also associated with higher perceived social acceptability of e-cigarette use.
Conclusions: Being exposed to e-cigarette marketing, either online or through traditional marketing channels, is associated with perceived social acceptability of e-cigarette use, as is contact with provaping sites. Regulatory options to avoid the proliferation of promotional websites disguised as opinion or user sites need to be considered.

Keywords

References

  1. Tob Control. 2023 Aug;32(e2):e269-e270 [PMID: 35064013]
  2. Lung. 2019 Oct;197(5):533-540 [PMID: 31463548]
  3. Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):290-297 [PMID: 29236550]
  4. Addict Behav. 2019 Dec;99:106047 [PMID: 31442788]
  5. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):14-24 [PMID: 29315420]
  6. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):647-53 [PMID: 26386472]
  7. Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):298-305 [PMID: 29236549]
  8. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Aug 1;213:108112 [PMID: 32574981]
  9. Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Feb;181(2):453-462 [PMID: 34396473]
  10. Subst Abuse. 2019 Aug 19;13:1178221819866210 [PMID: 31456638]
  11. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jan 15;6(1):e13673 [PMID: 31939747]
  12. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):32 [PMID: 31969114]
  13. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(4):442-448 [PMID: 33596764]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;18(13): [PMID: 34202600]
  15. Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3:iii12-8 [PMID: 16754941]
  16. Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3:iii17-25 [PMID: 24935893]
  17. Tob Control. 2020 May;29(3):295-304 [PMID: 31152116]
  18. Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105775 [PMID: 31323286]

Grants

  1. R01 TW010652/FIC NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0e-cigarette1advertisingsocialacceptabilitywebsitesexposuremarketinguseadjustedOR95%CIInternete-cigaretteschannelsevaluateelectroniccigarettesassociationperceptionsMexicoonlineusersacrossvisitsoutsidestoresadvertisements25associatedperceivedprovapingsitesnicotineObjectives:prevalencecommunicationsMethods:Dataanalyzedeightsurveys2018-2021sampleMexicanadult>18yearssmokersdualcombustibleSelf-reportedvariousassessedwellLogisticregressionanalysisusedlevelResults:occurredreported474%468%respondentsrespectivelyRespondentsnoticedoddsratio43confidenceintervals63311450temporaryoutlets160134visited4876likelyperceivesociallyacceptableNoticingalsohigherConclusions:exposedeithertraditionalcontactRegulatoryoptionsavoidproliferationpromotionaldisguisedopinionuserneedconsideredExposureamongElectronicdeliverysystemsvaping

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)