Are workplace factors associated with employee alcohol use? The WIRUS cross-sectional study.

Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen, Jens Christoffer Skogen, Tore Bonsaksen, Lisebet Skeie Skarpaas, Randi Wågø Aas
Author Information
  1. Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen: Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway mikkel-magnus.thorrisen@oslomet.no. ORCID
  2. Jens Christoffer Skogen: Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
  3. Tore Bonsaksen: Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
  4. Lisebet Skeie Skarpaas: Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
  5. Randi Wågø Aas: Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sociodemographic predictors of employee alcohol use are well established in the literature, but knowledge about associations between workplace factors and alcohol use is less explored. The aim of this study was to explore whether workplace factors were associated with employee alcohol use (consumption and alcohol-related problems).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses.
SETTING: Heterogeneous sample of employees (workers and supervisors) from 22 companies across geographical locations and work divisions in Norway.
PARTICIPANTS: Employees (N=5388) responded on survey items measuring workplace factors and alcohol use.
OUTCOMES: Data on alcohol use were collected with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Consumption was measured with the AUDIT-C (the first three items), and alcohol-related problems were operationalised as a sum score of 8 or higher on the full 10-item AUDIT.
RESULTS: Higher levels of alcohol consumption were associated with more liberal workplace drinking social norms (b=1.37, p<0.001), working full-time (b=0.18, p<0.001), working from holiday home (b=0.40, p<0.01), being a supervisor (b=0.25, p<0.001), having supervisors with less desired leadership qualities (b=-0.10, p<0.01), shorter working hours (b=-0.03, p<0.05), higher workplace social support (b=0.13, p<0.05) and higher income (b=0.02, p<0.001). Alcohol-related problems were associated with more liberal workplace drinking social norms (OR=3.52, p<0.001) and shorter working hours (OR=0.94, p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Workplace drinking social norms were the supremely most dominant predictor of both consumption and alcohol-related problems. Results suggest that some workplace factors may play a role in explaining employee alcohol consumption, although the predictive ability of these factors was limited. This study points to the importance of drinking social norms, workplace drinking culture and leadership for understanding employee alcohol use.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 24;19(1):1364 [PMID: 31651277]
  2. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989 Aug;15(4):271-9 [PMID: 2772582]
  3. Addiction. 2009 Mar;104(3):365-77 [PMID: 19207344]
  4. Psychol Methods. 2003 Jun;8(2):129-48 [PMID: 12924811]
  5. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Aug;59(4):223-32 [PMID: 21764233]
  6. Addict Behav. 1989;14(6):649-54 [PMID: 2618848]
  7. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 May;26(3):295-9 [PMID: 17454019]
  8. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804 [PMID: 8329970]
  9. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):735 [PMID: 29898703]
  10. Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Nov-Dec;40(6):578-83 [PMID: 16115822]
  11. J Occup Rehabil. 2008 Dec;18(4):335-46 [PMID: 18679775]
  12. BMJ. 2015 Jan 13;350:g7772 [PMID: 25587065]
  13. Front Physiol. 2022 Jul 11;13:884154 [PMID: 35899022]
  14. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e029184 [PMID: 31315869]
  15. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Sep 14;158(16):1789-95 [PMID: 9738608]
  16. Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Dec;14:100377 [PMID: 34549078]
  17. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55 [PMID: 9805280]
  18. Can J Public Health. 2013 Oct 31;104(7):e502-8 [PMID: 24495829]
  19. Addiction. 2017 Jun;112(6):968-1001 [PMID: 28220587]
  20. Occup Environ Med. 2007 Sep;64(9):602-8 [PMID: 17525095]
  21. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016 Mar;35(2):158-69 [PMID: 26331574]
  22. J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jan;67(1):147-56 [PMID: 16536139]
  23. Alcohol Alcohol. 2022 Jan 8;57(1):47-57 [PMID: 33604615]
  24. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(14):2062-9 [PMID: 20001695]
  25. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992 Aug;27(4):198-202 [PMID: 1411749]
  26. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jul;8(7):2692-705 [PMID: 21845153]
  27. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999 May;25(2):351-69 [PMID: 10395165]
  28. J Occup Health Psychol. 2003 Jan;8(1):39-54 [PMID: 12553528]
  29. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 18;14:1297 [PMID: 25519144]
  30. Lancet. 2005 Feb 5-11;365(9458):519-30 [PMID: 15705462]
  31. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;18(24): [PMID: 34948807]
  32. J Addict Dis. 2020 Apr-Jun;38(2):100-112 [PMID: 32037988]
  33. Addict Behav. 2018 Apr;79:107-112 [PMID: 29287186]
  34. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 24;2:CD004148 [PMID: 29476653]
  35. Lancet. 2018 Apr 14;391(10129):1513-1523 [PMID: 29676281]
  36. Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):372-9 [PMID: 22493045]
  37. Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392(10152):1015-1035 [PMID: 30146330]
  38. Lancet. 2016 Jun 25;387(10038):2582-2583 [PMID: 27353807]
  39. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Sep 1;202:87-92 [PMID: 31325821]
  40. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 21;9(7):e102514 [PMID: 25048033]
  41. Work. 2013;44(2):191-200 [PMID: 22927607]
  42. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006 Nov;30(11):1884-8 [PMID: 17067353]
  43. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:3032-8 [PMID: 22317181]
  44. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Jul;87(5):471-81 [PMID: 23708752]
  45. Occup Med (Lond). 2003 Dec;53(8):518-26 [PMID: 14673126]
  46. Front Psychiatry. 2014 Oct 06;5:131 [PMID: 25339914]
  47. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:126-129 [PMID: 28646715]
  48. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013 Jan;32(1):19-26 [PMID: 22672655]
  49. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262458 [PMID: 35015789]
  50. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):66-78 [PMID: 24232177]
  51. Alcohol Alcohol. 2019 May 1;54(3):264-271 [PMID: 30957142]
  52. Addict Behav. 1998 Jan-Feb;23(1):101-7 [PMID: 9468747]
  53. Arch Environ Health. 1970 Mar;20(3):424-35 [PMID: 5415844]
  54. Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106205 [PMID: 33189992]
  55. Alcohol Alcohol Suppl. 2006 Oct-Nov;41(1):i26-36 [PMID: 17030500]
  56. BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 18;16:111 [PMID: 26888538]
  57. Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):2090-7 [PMID: 23678931]
  58. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Feb;72(2):113-120 [PMID: 29183955]
  59. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Sep;27(9):1428-35 [PMID: 14506403]
  60. Scand J Public Health. 2017 Dec;45(8):749-756 [PMID: 28666393]
  61. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 13;10:2079 [PMID: 31607975]
  62. Stat Med. 1997 May 15;16(9):965-80 [PMID: 9160492]
  63. Public Health. 2012 Jan;126(1):3-11 [PMID: 22137093]
  64. BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 24;8:333 [PMID: 18816388]
  65. J Stud Alcohol. 2000 Mar;61(2):203-19 [PMID: 10757130]
  66. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 May 1;44(3):291-302 [PMID: 29325179]
  67. J Subst Use. 2012;17(3):269-276 [PMID: 22844225]
  68. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222 [PMID: 33069326]
  69. BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 12;15:1112 [PMID: 26558686]
  70. Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Mar 21;53(4):574-584 [PMID: 28910176]

MeSH Term

Alcohol Drinking
Alcoholism
Cross-Sectional Studies
Employment
Humans
Workplace

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0p<0alcoholworkplaceusefactorsemployeedrinkingsocial001b=0studyassociatedconsumptionproblemsnormsworkingalcohol-relatedhigher05lesssupervisorsitemsAUDITliberal01leadershipb=-0shorterhoursOBJECTIVES:SociodemographicpredictorswellestablishedliteratureknowledgeassociationsexploredaimexplorewhetherDESIGN:Cross-sectionalLinearbinarylogisticregressionanalysesSETTING:Heterogeneoussampleemployeesworkers22companiesacrossgeographicallocationsworkdivisionsNorwayPARTICIPANTS:EmployeesN=5388respondedsurveymeasuringOUTCOMES:DatacollectedAlcoholUseDisordersIdentificationTestConsumptionmeasuredAUDIT-Cfirstthreeoperationalisedsumscore8full10-itemRESULTS:Higherlevelsb=137full-time18holidayhome40supervisor25desiredqualities1003support13income02Alcohol-relatedOR=352OR=094CONCLUSIONS:WorkplacesupremelydominantpredictorResultssuggestmayplayroleexplainingalthoughpredictiveabilitylimitedpointsimportancecultureunderstandinguse?WIRUScross-sectionalepidemiologyoccupational&industrialmedicinepublichealth

Similar Articles

Cited By