Initial Experience of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Baltic Country Center.

Rokas Račkauskas, Augustinas Baušys, Jonas Jurgaitis, Marius Paškonis, Kęstutis Strupas
Author Information
  1. Rokas Račkauskas: Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Ciurlionio Str. 21, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania.
  2. Augustinas Baušys: Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Ciurlionio Str. 21, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania. ORCID
  3. Jonas Jurgaitis: Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Ciurlionio Str. 21, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania.
  4. Marius Paškonis: Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Ciurlionio Str. 21, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania.
  5. Kęstutis Strupas: Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Ciurlionio Str. 21, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania.

Abstract

: Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are a heterogenous group of primary and metastatic cancers affecting the peritoneum. They are associated with poor long-term outcomes. Many centers around the world adopt cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in routine clinical practice for these otherwise condemned patients despite a lack of high-level evidence from randomized control trials. This study aimed to investigate and present our 10-year experience with this controversial method, CRS and HIPEC, for PSM in a single tertiary center in a Baltic country. Patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos between 2011 and 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Overall survival was the primary study outcome. Secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity and mortality, and local or systemic recurrence rates. Sixty-nine patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC were included in the study. Most patients underwent treatment for peritoneal metastases from colorectal, ovarian, and appendiceal cancers. Six (8.7%) patients received CRS and HIPEC for primary peritoneal neoplasm-pseudomyxoma peritonei. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index score was 12 ± 7. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 62 (89.9%) patients. The mean OS was 39 ± 29 months. The mean survival of patients with PSMs of different origin was as follows: 39 ± 25 (95% CI: 28-50) months for colorectal cancer, 44 ± 31 (95% CI: 30-58) months for ovarian cancer, 32 ± 21 (95% CI: 21-43) months for appendiceal cancer, 422 ± 1 (95% CI: 12-97) months for pseudomyxoma peritonei, and 7 months for gastric cancer. The current study demonstrated the results of the CRS and HIPEC program in a single Baltic country tertiary center. Patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PSMs achieved moderate survival rates with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality risk.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 07;11(5): [PMID: 35268546]
  2. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):256-266 [PMID: 33476595]
  3. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230-240 [PMID: 29342393]
  4. Curr Probl Cancer. 2021 Dec;45(6):100737 [PMID: 34116836]
  5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;29(8):999-1007 [PMID: 24965858]
  6. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Aug 01;7(8):1231-1238 [PMID: 33956063]
  7. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;10(Suppl 1):65-70 [PMID: 30886496]
  8. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2757-2767 [PMID: 34001385]
  9. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010 Feb 15;2(2):68-75 [PMID: 21160924]
  10. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;4(10):761-770 [PMID: 31371228]
  11. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1124-1125 [PMID: 32717181]
  12. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Nov-Dec;48(42):1776-82 [PMID: 11813623]
  13. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 10;37(23):2028-2040 [PMID: 31084544]
  14. J Surg Res. 2018 Nov;231:77-82 [PMID: 30278972]
  15. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jun;22(5):778-85 [PMID: 22572845]
  16. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 21;22(3):1114-30 [PMID: 26811651]
  17. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Sep;46(9):1661-1671 [PMID: 32715605]
  18. Curr Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(3):146-154 [PMID: 32669924]
  19. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2426-32 [PMID: 18521686]
  20. Br J Surg. 2012 May;99(5):699-705 [PMID: 22287157]
  21. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jan;7(1):69-76 [PMID: 16389186]
  22. Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 03;11:795390 [PMID: 34926311]
  23. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;38(7):617-23 [PMID: 22572106]
  24. JAMA Surg. 2021 Mar 1;156(3):e206363 [PMID: 33502455]
  25. Am J Surg. 2017 Sep;214(3):462-467 [PMID: 28622839]
  26. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1988;373(3):189-96 [PMID: 3288830]
  27. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 May;22(5):884-893 [PMID: 29363016]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CRSHIPECpatientsperitoneal±monthsstudycancerunderwent95%CI:PSMsprimaryBalticincludedsurvivalcolorectalmeanPeritonealsurfacemalignanciescancersperitoneumoutcomescytoreductivesurgeryhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapysingletertiarycentercountryPatientspostoperativemorbiditymortalityratesmetastasesovarianappendicealperitoneicarcinomatosis7achieved39:heterogenousgroupmetastaticaffectingassociatedpoorlong-termManycentersaroundworldadoptroutineclinicalpracticeotherwisecondemneddespitelackhigh-levelevidencerandomizedcontroltrialsaimedinvestigatepresent10-yearexperiencecontroversialmethodPSMVilniusUniversityHospitalSantarosKlinikos20112021retrospectiveOveralloutcomeSecondarylocalsystemicrecurrenceSixty-ninetreatmentSix87%receivedneoplasm-pseudomyxomaindexscore12Completecytoreduction62899%OS29differentoriginfollows:2528-50443130-58322121-43422112-97pseudomyxomagastriccurrentdemonstratedresultsprogrammoderateacceptableriskInitialExperienceCytoreductiveSurgeryHyperthermicIntraperitonealChemotherapyCountryCentermesothelioma

Similar Articles

Cited By