The COVID-19 pandemic, mask-wearing, and emotion recognition during late-childhood.

Maia Chester, Rista C Plate, Tralucia Powell, Yuheiry Rodriguez, Nicholas J Wagner, Rebecca Waller
Author Information
  1. Maia Chester: Department of Psychology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA. ORCID
  2. Rista C Plate: Department of Psychology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
  3. Tralucia Powell: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
  4. Yuheiry Rodriguez: Department of Psychology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
  5. Nicholas J Wagner: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA. ORCID
  6. Rebecca Waller: Department of Psychology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

Abstract

Face masks are an effective and important tool to prevent the spread of COVID-19, including among children. However, occluding parts of the face can impact emotion recognition, which is fundamental to effective social interactions. Social distancing, stress, and changes to routines because of the pandemic have also altered the social landscape of children, with implications for social development. To better understand how social input and context impact emotion recognition, the current study investigated emotion recognition in children (7-12 years old, = 131) using images of both masked and unmasked emotional faces. We also assessed a subsample of participants ("pre-pandemic subsample," = 35) who had completed the same emotion recognition task with unmasked faces before and during the pandemic. Masking of faces was related to worse emotion recognition, with more pronounced effects for happy, sad, and fearful faces than angry and neutral faces. Masking was more strongly related to emotion recognition among children whose families reported greater social disruption in response to the pandemic. Finally, in the pre-pandemic subsample, emotion recognition of sad faces was lower during versus before the pandemic relative to other emotions. Together, findings show that occluding face parts and the broader social context (i.e., global pandemic) both impact emotion-relevant judgments in school-aged children.

Keywords

References

  1. J Fam Violence. 2022;37(5):725-731 [PMID: 32836736]
  2. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2426-42 [PMID: 23679155]
  3. Iperception. 2021 Aug 19;12(4):20416695211038265 [PMID: 34447567]
  4. Soc Dev. 2022 Aug 25;: [PMID: 36246541]
  5. J Genet Psychol. 2014 Sep-Dec;175(5-6):416-30 [PMID: 25271818]
  6. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:566886 [PMID: 33101135]
  7. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0243708 [PMID: 33362251]
  8. Cognition. 2012 Nov;125(2):195-206 [PMID: 22892280]
  9. Dev Rev. 2015 Sep 1;37:41-65 [PMID: 26405369]
  10. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):18-23 [PMID: 11294223]
  11. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021 Dec;52(6):1012-1023 [PMID: 33405026]
  12. Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 20;10(1):291 [PMID: 32820171]
  13. Public Health. 2020 Jun;183:110-111 [PMID: 32502699]
  14. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;59(2):263-273 [PMID: 31026574]
  15. JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2199-2200 [PMID: 33792610]
  16. Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 04;9:446 [PMID: 29670561]
  17. Front Psychol. 2021 May 25;12:669432 [PMID: 34113297]
  18. Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Jun;33(2):218-36 [PMID: 25492258]
  19. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Sep;2(3):260-80 [PMID: 26151969]
  20. Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;138(1):146-74 [PMID: 22061689]
  21. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;52(10):1015-25 [PMID: 21815892]
  22. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 01;5(12):e15058 [PMID: 21152015]
  23. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 10;11(1):5577 [PMID: 33692417]
  24. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Oct;148(10):1814-1827 [PMID: 30570327]
  25. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:207-46 [PMID: 17120806]
  26. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):506-511 [PMID: 34570561]
  27. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:259-85 [PMID: 22017377]
  28. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 Mar;22(2):189-222 [PMID: 11806019]
  29. Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jan;295:113585 [PMID: 33303223]
  30. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 21;10(1):22344 [PMID: 33349645]
  31. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Nov 19;5(1):59 [PMID: 33210257]
  32. J Sch Health. 2021 Jul;91(7):555-561 [PMID: 33997986]
  33. Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):618-22 [PMID: 14629695]
  34. Dev Sci. 2006 Mar;9(2):207-20 [PMID: 16472321]
  35. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2019 Jul;20(1):1-68 [PMID: 31313636]
  36. PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177239 [PMID: 28493921]
  37. Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1): [PMID: 34972218]
  38. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jul;49(7):900-906 [PMID: 33347937]
  39. Child Dev. 2003 Jan-Feb;74(1):238-56 [PMID: 12625448]
  40. Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1677-93 [PMID: 24673293]
  41. JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jan 1;176(1):96-98 [PMID: 34779832]
  42. Emotion. 2021 Oct;21(7):1452-1469 [PMID: 34726428]
  43. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Sep;20(3):145-56 [PMID: 22547297]
  44. J Genet Psychol. 2017 Mar-Apr;178(2):139-146 [PMID: 28323534]
  45. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;47(11):1098-106 [PMID: 17076748]
  46. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Apr;24(2):200-13 [PMID: 11992203]

Grants

  1. R01 MH125904/NIMH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emotionrecognitionpandemicsocialfaceschildrenimpactcontextsubsampleeffectiveCOVID-19amongoccludingpartsfacealsodevelopmentunmaskedMaskingrelatedsadFacemasksimportanttoolpreventspreadincludingHowevercanfundamentalinteractionsSocialdistancingstresschangesroutinesalteredlandscapeimplicationsbetterunderstandinputcurrentstudyinvestigated7-12yearsold= 131usingimagesmaskedemotionalassessedparticipants"pre-pandemic"= 35completedtaskworsepronouncedeffectshappyfearfulangryneutralstronglywhosefamiliesreportedgreaterdisruptionresponseFinallypre-pandemiclowerversusrelativeemotionsTogetherfindingsshowbroaderieglobalemotion-relevantjudgmentsschool-agedmask-wearinglate-childhoodCOVID‐19familyparenting

Similar Articles

Cited By