Ethico-legal regional differences in European neurosurgical practice: Part 1-pre-COVID-19 era.

Tiit I Mathiesen, Naci Balak, Nicolás Samprón, Marike Broekman, Ciarán Bolger, EANS Ethico-Legal Committee
Author Information
  1. Tiit I Mathiesen: Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  2. Naci Balak: Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  3. Nicolás Samprón: Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
  4. Marike Broekman: Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
  5. Ciarán Bolger: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Abstract

Introduction: Professionalism entails expert knowledge, self-regulation, accountability, and professional ethics. These factors are influenced by culture, political observance, professional maturity, education, and occupation; ethical practices may thus vary between countries and affect how neurosurgery is practiced.
Research question: This paper aims to conduct a survey that addresses whether ethico-legal practices differ in European countries and whether existing ethical guidelines have been implemented.
Material and methods: A questionnaire survey was used to examine the ethico-legal situation in 29 European countries or regions. The reports were validated by representatives of each nation.
Results: Existing guidelines had been implemented to a minimal extent. Major regional and national differences were found in attitudes toward life and death, prioritization, and issues related to professional conduct.
Discussion and conclusion: The results of this survey reveal inadequacies and weaknesses of policies and resources, which should spark national discussions to improve the conditions that influence professional ethics. Unfortunately, only a minority of neurosurgeons know the neurosurgical ethics guidelines and apply them in their decision making. Our findings highlight the importance of values and professional ethics in decision making.

Keywords

References

  1. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5 [PMID: 19886379]
  2. J Surg Educ. 2009 Jan-Feb;66(1):35-42 [PMID: 19215896]
  3. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Sep;162(9):2221-2233 [PMID: 32642834]
  4. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(8):793-9 [PMID: 10536714]
  5. J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):829-38 [PMID: 25012607]
  6. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jul;162(7):1485-1490 [PMID: 32405671]
  7. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):282-5 [PMID: 11294724]
  8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 17;15:164 [PMID: 25927636]
  9. J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan 13;: [PMID: 33441304]
  10. Perspect Biol Med. 2008 Autumn;51(4):579-98 [PMID: 18997360]
  11. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2010 Jul 08;3:3 [PMID: 23908738]
  12. World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:420-424 [PMID: 28347897]
  13. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):699-706 [PMID: 31975509]
  14. World Neurosurg. 2011 Sep-Oct;76(3-4):239-47 [PMID: 21986412]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0professionalethicsguidelinespracticescountriessurveyEuropeanProfessionalismethicalconductwhetherethico-legalimplementedregionalnationaldifferencesneurosurgicaldecisionmakingEthico-legalEthicsIntroduction:entailsexpertknowledgeself-regulationaccountabilityfactorsinfluencedculturepoliticalobservancematurityeducationoccupationmaythusvaryaffectneurosurgerypracticedResearchquestion:paperaimsaddressesdifferexistingMaterialmethods:questionnaireusedexaminesituation29regionsreportsvalidatedrepresentativesnationResults:ExistingminimalextentMajorfoundattitudestowardlifedeathprioritizationissuesrelatedDiscussionconclusion:resultsrevealinadequaciesweaknessespoliciesresourcessparkdiscussionsimproveconditionsinfluenceUnfortunatelyminorityneurosurgeonsknowapplyfindingshighlightimportancevaluespractice:Part1-pre-COVID-19eraEuropeNeurosurgery

Similar Articles

Cited By