The space paradox in graphic representation.

Christiane Lange-Küttner, Ximena Vinueza Chavez
Author Information
  1. Christiane Lange-Küttner: Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Freie Hansestadt Bremen, Germany.
  2. Ximena Vinueza Chavez: School of Psychology, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The negative space drawing technique refers to drawing the transparent space around and between objects, rather than drawing the objects themselves. This space-based instruction is thought to attenuate object-specific visual attention and to enhance perception of a spatial expanse. Developmentally, it is equivalent to the Piagetian dichotomic space concept of filled and empty space. A sample of 96 children from 5 to 12 years of age and 24 adults ( = 120) drew on a computer tablet a real-life model spacebox placed in front of the participant, with three cubes placed inside the model. Children followed two instructions, a "Please draw the three cubes and the box as you can see them" and a "Please draw the space around the objects," with the sequence counterbalanced. NSp outline drawings began to show from 9 years onwards. A positive effect of the NSp technique showed for occlusion drawing because of the depiction of common contour of objects which could create a cohesive scene feature such as a horizon. The VR instruction focused attention toward the space box and enhanced 3D drawing of both the spacebox and the cubes. Thus, it could be concluded-rather paradoxically-that drawing in 3D is better based on object- than on space-based attention, while drawing occlusion is better based on space-based than object-based attention. We suggest, however, that a better definition of VR as attention to object appearances is that VR unifies objects and spatial context into one global plane.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):297-306 [PMID: 24188151]
  2. J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Aug;66(2):264-78 [PMID: 9245478]
  3. J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Apr;61(3):276-301 [PMID: 8812051]
  4. Child Dev. 2021 Jan;92(1):76-100 [PMID: 32892345]
  5. Br J Psychol. 2013 Aug;104(3):413-37 [PMID: 23848390]
  6. J Exp Child Psychol. 1980 Aug;30(1):79-87 [PMID: 7391747]
  7. J Pers. 1950 Sep;19(1):1-15 [PMID: 14795367]
  8. J Genet Psychol. 1995 Sep;156(3):293-302 [PMID: 7595423]
  9. Perception. 1995;24(9):995-1010 [PMID: 8552463]
  10. Brain Cogn. 2015 Jul;97:59-73 [PMID: 26025390]
  11. Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Feb;90(1):3-24 [PMID: 10769876]
  12. Cereb Cortex. 2018 Sep 1;28(9):3295-3308 [PMID: 28968652]
  13. J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Jun;88(2):171-92 [PMID: 15157757]
  14. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1479-1490 [PMID: 33398657]
  15. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jun;150(6):1071-1080 [PMID: 33119354]
  16. Dev Psychol. 2009 Jul;45(4):913-27 [PMID: 19586170]
  17. PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251475 [PMID: 33989332]
  18. Cognition. 1990 Jan;34(1):57-83 [PMID: 1689233]
  19. Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1491-502 [PMID: 24597709]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spacedrawingattentionobjectsspace-basedtechniquevisualspatialcubesVR3Dbetternegativearoundinstructionyearsmodelspaceboxplacedthree"PleasedrawboxNSpocclusionbasedobject-basedreferstransparentratherthoughtattenuateobject-specificenhanceperceptionexpanseDevelopmentallyequivalentPiagetiandichotomicconceptfilledemptysample96children512age24adults=120drewcomputertabletreal-lifefrontparticipantinsideChildrenfollowedtwoinstructionscanseethem""sequencecounterbalancedoutlinedrawingsbeganshow9onwardspositiveeffectshoweddepictioncommoncontourcreatecohesivescenefeaturehorizonfocusedtowardenhancedThusconcluded-ratherparadoxically-thatobject-suggesthoweverdefinitionobjectappearancesunifiescontextoneglobalplaneparadoxgraphicrepresentationrenderingdevelopmentconceptsrealism

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.