The role of cognition, affect, and resources in the influence of unreasonable tasks on work engagement: A moderated chain mediation model.

Hao Cheng, Zhen Li, Junshu Zhao, Weiqiang Wang, Ruixi Zou
Author Information
  1. Hao Cheng: School of Humanities, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, China.
  2. Zhen Li: School of Humanities, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, China.
  3. Junshu Zhao: Department of Preventive Health Care, The Fourth People's Hospital of Ya'an, Ya'an, China.
  4. Weiqiang Wang: School of Business, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  5. Ruixi Zou: School of Humanities, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, China.

Abstract

Some studies have concentrated on the adverse effects of unreasonable tasks on work engagement. So far, however, the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions of the relationship have not been adequately discussed. Based on the cognitive-affective systems theory and the job demands-resources model, this study constructs a chain mediation model in which unreasonable tasks influence work engagement through work alienation and negative affect and explores the moderating role of supervisor support in the model. An analysis of 427 questionnaires from multiple types of organizations shows that: Unreasonable tasks have a negative impact on work engagement; work alienation and negative affect play both separate and chain mediating roles in the negative effect of unreasonable tasks on work engagement, and supervisor support negatively moderates chain mediation by moderating the positive effect of unreasonable tasks on work alienation. This study re-investigates the relationship between unreasonable tasks and work engagement from cognitive, affective, and resource perspectives, which could be a valuable addition to established research and provide suggestions and assistance for management practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Hosp Top. 2022 Aug 27;:1-10 [PMID: 36036177]
  2. J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):453-67 [PMID: 15910142]
  3. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Oct 07;14:1603-1613 [PMID: 34675701]
  4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):407 [PMID: 29871623]
  5. Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):246-68 [PMID: 7740090]
  6. Occup Health Sci. 2019;3(3):205-238 [PMID: 32647746]
  7. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(2):241-255 [PMID: 29683712]
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):565-73 [PMID: 12090614]
  9. Ind Health. 2018 Nov 21;56(6):524-538 [PMID: 29998923]
  10. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Oct 07;12:931-941 [PMID: 31632165]
  11. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Apr;27(3):553-559 [PMID: 30171647]
  12. Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 14;12:745413 [PMID: 34970186]
  13. Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 28;13:852687 [PMID: 35295388]
  14. Ind Health. 2022 Mar 18;: [PMID: 35314542]
  15. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 Aug 02;11:299-303 [PMID: 30123012]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8): [PMID: 32326579]
  17. J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;23(2):248-261 [PMID: 28206790]
  18. Work Stress. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):32-56 [PMID: 25892839]
  19. Psychol Rep. 2020 Oct;123(5):1635-1662 [PMID: 31510875]
  20. Saf Health Work. 2018 Dec;9(4):434-440 [PMID: 30559992]
  21. J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jul;30(13-14):2093-2106 [PMID: 33829574]
  22. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 28;12:739593 [PMID: 34777127]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0worktasksunreasonableengagementnegativemodelchainalienationaffectmediationsupervisorsupportrelationshipstudyinfluencemoderatingroleeffectstudiesconcentratedadverseeffectsfarhoweverunderlyingmechanismsboundaryconditionsadequatelydiscussedBasedcognitive-affectivesystemstheoryjobdemands-resourcesconstructsexploresanalysis427questionnairesmultipletypesorganizationsshowsthat:Unreasonableimpactplayseparatemediatingrolesnegativelymoderatespositivere-investigatescognitiveaffectiveresourceperspectivesvaluableadditionestablishedresearchprovidesuggestionsassistancemanagementpracticecognitionresourcesengagement:moderatedillegitimate

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)