I don't care why you do it, just don't! Reactions to negative and positive organizational deviance partly depend on the desire for tightness of prevention-focused employees.

Silvana Mula, Antonio Pierro
Author Information
  1. Silvana Mula: Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  2. Antonio Pierro: Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Tightness-Looseness (T-L) at the individual level has only begun to receive attention from researchers. Specifically in the organizational context, this is a so far unexplored construct. The study offers first insights into the mechanisms that can trigger individuals' desire for tightness and the consequences it can have on organizational behaviors. We, therefore, investigated the mediating role of the desire for tightness on the relationship between work regulatory prevention focus and emotional responses to both negative and positive (i.e., pro-social) deviant organizational behaviors. We tested our prediction through a mediational model with a sample of 788 Italian employees (58.6% females, age = 35.09). Our findings supported the hypothesized model showing that regardless of the motivation underpinning the norm-violating behavior, employees with a prevention focus are more desirous of tightness and exhibit hostile reactions toward deviance. Given its importance in understanding employees' behaviors and intentions, which inevitably reflect on the organization's functionality, the impact of the T-L individual-level dimension in organizations is undoubtedly worthy of deeper investigation.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1220-33 [PMID: 19025244]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4): [PMID: 35206549]
  3. Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4 [PMID: 21617077]
  4. J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1225-44 [PMID: 17100480]
  5. Am Psychol. 1997 Dec;52(12):1280-300 [PMID: 9414606]
  6. Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol. 2022;3:100028 [PMID: 35098189]
  7. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0221953 [PMID: 31490981]
  8. Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;12:713952 [PMID: 34594277]
  9. Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 03;12:652068 [PMID: 34925116]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15;112(50):15348-53 [PMID: 26621713]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):7990-5 [PMID: 24843116]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Sep;123(3):e1-e22 [PMID: 35201815]
  13. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:739579 [PMID: 35519640]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0organizationaltightnessdesirebehaviorspreventionfocusemployeesdevianceT-LcanregulatorynegativepositivemodelTightness-LoosenessindividuallevelbegunreceiveattentionresearchersSpecificallycontextfarunexploredconstructstudyoffersfirstinsightsmechanismstriggerindividuals'consequencesthereforeinvestigatedmediatingrolerelationshipworkemotionalresponsesiepro-socialdevianttestedpredictionmediationalsample788Italian586%femalesage = 3509findingssupportedhypothesizedshowingregardlessmotivationunderpinningnorm-violatingbehaviordesirousexhibithostilereactionstowardGivenimportanceunderstandingemployees'intentionsinevitablyreflectorganization'sfunctionalityimpactindividual-leveldimensionorganizationsundoubtedlyworthydeeperinvestigationcarejustdon't!Reactionspartlydependprevention-focusednorm-violationtightness–looseness

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)