It is probably a pattern: does spontaneous focusing on regularities in preschool predict reasoning about randomness four years later?

Anne-Sophie Supply, Nore Wijns, Wim Van Dooren, Patrick Onghena
Author Information
  1. Anne-Sophie Supply: Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU Leuven, Dekenstraat 2 box 3773, 3000 Louvain, Belgium. ORCID
  2. Nore Wijns: Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU Leuven, Dekenstraat 2 box 3773, 3000 Louvain, Belgium. ORCID
  3. Wim Van Dooren: Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU Leuven, Dekenstraat 2 box 3773, 3000 Louvain, Belgium. ORCID
  4. Patrick Onghena: Methodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 box 3762, 3000 Louvain, Belgium. ORCID

Abstract

The many studies with coin-tossing tasks in literature show that the concept of randomness is challenging for adults as well as children. Systematic errors observed in coin-tossing tasks are often related to the representativeness heuristic, which refers to a mental shortcut that is used to judge randomness by evaluating how well a set of random events represents the typical example for random events we hold in our mind. Representative thinking is explained by our tendency to seek for patterns in our surroundings. In the present study, predictions of coin-tosses of 302 third-graders were explored. Findings suggest that in third grade of elementary school, children make correct as well as different types of erroneous predictions and individual differences exist. Moreover, erroneous predictions that were in line with representative thinking were positively associated with an early spontaneous focus on regularities, which was assessed when they were in second year of preschool. We concluded that previous studies might have underestimated children's reasoning about randomness in coin-tossing contexts and that representative thinking is indeed associated with pattern-based thinking tendencies.

Keywords

References

  1. Science. 1988 Apr 29;240(4852):611-6 [PMID: 17840903]
  2. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jan;146(1):63-76 [PMID: 28054813]
  3. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31 [PMID: 17835457]
  4. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):486-496 [PMID: 33362344]
  5. Child Dev. 2021 Jul;92(4):1354-1368 [PMID: 33398877]
  6. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Feb;29(1):1-4 [PMID: 12630429]
  7. Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):262-85 [PMID: 19254080]
  8. Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Sep;90(3):753-769 [PMID: 31814113]
  9. Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):454-61 [PMID: 19348550]
  10. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Sep;83(1):26-52 [PMID: 12379417]
  11. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;20(1):62-8 [PMID: 16536666]
  12. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1642-8 [PMID: 23356242]
  13. Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(2):432-41 [PMID: 21142361]
  14. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Oct;174:60-76 [PMID: 29913307]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0randomnessthinkingcoin-tossingwellpredictionsstudiestaskschildrenheuristicrandomeventserroneousrepresentativeassociatedspontaneousregularitiespreschoolreasoningmanyliteratureshowconceptchallengingadultsSystematicerrorsobservedoftenrelatedrepresentativenessrefersmentalshortcutusedjudgeevaluatingsetrepresentstypicalexampleholdmindRepresentativeexplainedtendencyseekpatternssurroundingspresentstudycoin-tosses302third-gradersexploredFindingssuggestthirdgradeelementaryschoolmakecorrectdifferenttypesindividualdifferencesexistMoreoverlinepositivelyearlyfocusassessedsecondyearconcludedpreviousmightunderestimatedchildren'scontextsindeedpattern-basedtendenciesprobablypattern:focusingpredictfouryearslater?MathematicaldevelopmentPatternsRandomnessRepresentativeness

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.