Aman Chopra, Lauren M Shapiro, Kevin M Klifto, Oke Anakwenze, David S Ruch, Christopher S Klifto
Background: The dissemination of research and evidence-based medicine is critical to advancing science and improving clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the timing and associated factors of the publication process for the most influential orthopaedic surgery research journals.
Methods: After analyzing 25 orthopaedic surgery journals with the highest impact factors, 14 journals provided the necessary information for data analysis. A minimum of three consecutive issues per journal from 2021 were collected for review. Within each issue, all articles were included except for reviews, commentaries, replies, letters to the editor, and invited articles. The publication times for received to accepted (RA), received to published in press (RP1), and received to published in print (RP2) were retrieved and compared. Journal impact factor, specialty, and article level of evidence were recorded.
Results: A total of 1040 articles were included with a mean number of 74.3 �� 38 (range, 35-182) articles analyzed per journal. The mean impact factor for the 14 journals was 3.6 �� 1 (range, 2.5-5.8). The overall median duration of time for RA, RP1, and RP2 were 119 (IQR, 78-165) days, 157 (IQR, 102-216) days, and 291 (IQR, 243-378) days across all 14 journals, respectively. demonstrated the shortest median duration of time for RA and RP1, while demonstrated the shortest median duration of time for RP2. demonstrated the longest median duration of time for RA and RP2, while the demonstrated the longest median duration of time for RP1. Level three studies, which included retrospective case-control and cohort study designs, demonstrated the shortest publication times, while sports medicine journals demonstrated the longest publication times for all periods.
Conclusion: There was substantial variation in publication times across orthopaedic surgery journals which may impact accessibility to clinical insights.
