Radiomics combined with clinical features in distinguishing non-calcifying tuberculosis granuloma and lung adenocarcinoma in small pulmonary nodules.

Qing Dong, Qingqing Wen, Nan Li, Jinlong Tong, Zhaofu Li, Xin Bao, Jinzhi Xu, Dandan Li
Author Information
  1. Qing Dong: Department of Thoracic Surgery at No. 4 Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  2. Qingqing Wen: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America.
  3. Nan Li: Department of Pathology at No. 4 Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  4. Jinlong Tong: Department of Medical Imaging at No. 4 Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  5. Zhaofu Li: Heilongjiang Institute of Automation, Harbin, China.
  6. Xin Bao: Harbin Medtech Innovative Company, Harbin, China.
  7. Jinzhi Xu: Department of Thoracic Surgery at No. 4 Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  8. Dandan Li: Department of Radiology at Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the performance of radiomics models with the combination of clinical features in distinguishing non-calcified tuberculosis granuloma (TBG) and lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) in small pulmonary nodules.
Methodology: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 280 patients with pulmonary nodules confirmed by surgical biopsy from January 2017 to December 2020. Samples were divided into LAC group ( = 143) and TBG group ( = 137). We assigned them to a training dataset ( = 196) and a testing dataset ( = 84). Clinical features including gender, age, smoking, CT appearance (size, location, spiculated sign, lobulated shape, vessel convergence, and pleural indentation) were extracted and included in the radiomics models. 3D slicer and FAE software were used to delineate the Region of Interest (ROI) and extract clinical features. The performance of the model was evaluated by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC).
Results: Based on the model selection, clinical features gender, and age in the LAC group and TBG group showed a significant difference in both datasets ( < 0.05). CT appearance lobulated shape was also significantly different in the LAC group and TBG group (Training dataset,  = 0.034; Testing dataset,  = 0.030). AUC were 0.8344 (95% CI [0.7712-0.8872]) and 0.751 (95% CI [0.6382-0.8531]) in training and testing dataset, respectively.
Conclusion: With the capacity to detect differences between TBG and LAC based on their clinical features, radiomics models with a combined of clinical features may function as the potential non-invasive tool for distinguishing TBG and LAC in small pulmonary nodules.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 15;202(2):165-167 [PMID: 32383972]
  2. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 15;201(12):e83-e84 [PMID: 32050079]
  3. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249 [PMID: 33538338]
  4. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):910-9 [PMID: 24004118]
  5. World J Clin Cases. 2020 Nov 6;8(21):5203-5212 [PMID: 33269256]
  6. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Jul;128:109022 [PMID: 32371184]
  7. Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1331-1384 [PMID: 30904263]
  8. Cancer Imaging. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):45 [PMID: 32641166]
  9. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):138-155 [PMID: 28140453]
  10. Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 16;11(1):5228 [PMID: 33067442]
  11. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Autumn;26(3):210-22 [PMID: 25527015]
  12. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Mar;69(2):127-157 [PMID: 30720861]
  13. Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6497-6507 [PMID: 32594210]
  14. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 10;364(10):980-1 [PMID: 21388332]
  15. Mol Imaging Biol. 2021 Apr;23(2):287-298 [PMID: 33030709]
  16. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):281-285 [PMID: 32191687]
  17. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017 Feb;6(1):86-91 [PMID: 28331828]
  18. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 17;15(8):e0237587 [PMID: 32804986]
  19. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Dec;213(6):1213-1220 [PMID: 31557054]
  20. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34 [PMID: 30620402]
  21. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):324-332 [PMID: 30640382]
  22. Elife. 2017 Jul 21;6: [PMID: 28731408]
  23. Cancer Imaging. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):1 [PMID: 33407884]
  24. Chem Rev. 2018 Feb 28;118(4):1887-1916 [PMID: 29384369]
  25. PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 30;15(11):e1002711 [PMID: 30500819]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):959-960 [PMID: 32130819]
  27. Pulmonology. 2018 May - Jun;24(3):199-202 [PMID: 29754721]

MeSH Term

Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Adenocarcinoma of Lung
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
Granuloma

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0featuresclinicalTBGLACgroupnodulesdatasetpulmonaryradiomicsmodelsdistinguishingtuberculosisgranulomaadenocarcinomasmallperformancelungtrainingtestingClinicalgenderageCTappearancelobulatedshapemodelAUC = 0095%CI[0combinedRadiomicsAim:evaluatecombinationnon-calcifiedMethodology:conductedretrospectiveanalysis280patientsconfirmedsurgicalbiopsyJanuary2017December2020Samplesdivided = 143 = 137assigned = 196 = 84includingsmokingsizelocationspiculatedsignvesselconvergencepleuralindentationextractedincluded3DslicerFAEsoftwareuseddelineateRegionInterestROIextractevaluatedAreaReceiverOperatingCharacteristicROCCurveResults:Basedselectionshowedsignificantdifferencedatasets< 005alsosignificantlydifferentTraining034Testing03083447712-08872]7516382-08531]respectivelyConclusion:capacitydetectdifferencesbasedmayfunctionpotentialnon-invasivetoolnon-calcifyingLungNon-calcifiedPulmonary

Similar Articles

Cited By