Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting clinical coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: the PROGRESS-CTO perforation score.

Spyridon Kostantinis, Bahadir Simsek, Judit Karacsonyi, Khaldoon Alaswad, Farouc A Jaffer, Jaikirshan J Khatri, James W Choi, Wissam A Jaber, Stéphane Rinfret, William Nicholson, Mitul P Patel, Ehtisham Mahmud, Catalin Toma, Rhian E Davies, Jimmy L Kerrigan, Elias V Haddad, Sevket Gorgulu, Nidal Abi-Rafeh, Ahmed M ElGuindy, Omer Goktekin, Salman Allana, M Nicholas Burke, Olga C Mastrodemos, Bavana V Rangan, Emmanouil Brilakis
Author Information
  1. Spyridon Kostantinis: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  2. Bahadir Simsek: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  3. Judit Karacsonyi: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  4. Khaldoon Alaswad: Cardiovascular Division, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
  5. Farouc A Jaffer: Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  6. Jaikirshan J Khatri: Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  7. James W Choi: Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA.
  8. Wissam A Jaber: Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  9. Stéphane Rinfret: Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  10. William Nicholson: Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  11. Mitul P Patel: UCSD Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  12. Ehtisham Mahmud: UCSD Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  13. Catalin Toma: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  14. Rhian E Davies: Wellspan York Hospital, York, PA, USA.
  15. Jimmy L Kerrigan: Ascension Saint Thomas Heart Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA.
  16. Elias V Haddad: Ascension Saint Thomas Heart Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA.
  17. Sevket Gorgulu: Biruni University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
  18. Nidal Abi-Rafeh: North Oaks Health System, Hammond, LA, USA.
  19. Ahmed M ElGuindy: Aswan Heart Center, Magdi Yacoub Foundation, Cairo, Egypt.
  20. Omer Goktekin: Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  21. Salman Allana: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  22. M Nicholas Burke: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  23. Olga C Mastrodemos: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  24. Bavana V Rangan: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  25. Emmanouil Brilakis: Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery perforation is a feared complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and often leads to serious adverse clinical events.
AIMS: We sought to develop a risk score to predict clinical coronary artery perforation in patients undergoing CTO PCI.
METHODS: We analysed clinical and angiographic parameters from 9,618 CTO PCIs in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO). Logistic regression prediction modelling was used to identify variables independently associated with clinical perforation, and the model was internally validated with bootstrapping. Clinical coronary artery perforation was defined as any perforation requiring treatment.
RESULTS: The incidence of clinical coronary perforation was 3.8% (n=367). Five factors were independently associated with perforation and were included in the score: patient age ≥65 years +1 point (odds ratio [OR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-2.33), moderate/severe calcification +1 point (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.41-2.42), blunt/no stump +1 point (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.92), use of antegrade dissection and re-entry +1 point (OR 2.43, 95% CI: 1.61-3.69), and use of the retrograde approach +2 points (OR 4.02, 95% CI: 2.95-5.46). The resulting score showed acceptable performance on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.712-0.773). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good fit (p=0.991), and internal validation with bootstrapping demonstrated good agreement with the model with observed AUC: 0.736 (95% bias-corrected CI: 0.706-0.767).
CONCLUSIONS: The PROGRESS-CTO perforation score may be a useful tool for predicting clinical coronary perforation during CTO PCI.

References

  1. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 [PMID: 18929686]
  2. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 1;93(4):635-638 [PMID: 30549189]
  3. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6): [PMID: 27307562]
  4. Heart. 2016 Sep 15;102(18):1486-93 [PMID: 27164918]
  5. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Sep;26(9):E124-6 [PMID: 25198496]
  6. Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):479-500 [PMID: 33523728]
  7. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 14;12(19):1902-1912 [PMID: 31255554]
  8. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;9(8): [PMID: 27486140]
  9. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb;4(2):213-21 [PMID: 21349461]
  10. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Apr;34(4):E294-E295 [PMID: 35302949]
  11. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):40-46 [PMID: 28499595]
  12. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul 25;15(14):1413-1422 [PMID: 35863789]
  13. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):280-285 [PMID: 33438824]
  14. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(5):729-38 [PMID: 23074346]
  15. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40S:222-224 [PMID: 34903484]
  16. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):1332-1334 [PMID: 34851018]
  17. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):48-56 [PMID: 30312992]
  18. Circulation. 2019 Jul 30;140(5):420-433 [PMID: 31356129]
  19. Clin Interv Aging. 2020 May 28;15:771-781 [PMID: 32546995]
  20. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):1-21 [PMID: 34991814]
  21. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):966-973 [PMID: 28145612]
  22. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Oct;43:138-139 [PMID: 35550865]
  23. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Jun;19(6):465-473 [PMID: 33945367]
  24. Interv Cardiol. 2021 Oct 20;16:e30 [PMID: 34754332]
  25. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208 [PMID: 31078660]
  26. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Jan;19(1):71-87 [PMID: 33175595]
  27. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 22;6(9): [PMID: 28939719]
  28. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):1-9 [PMID: 26762904]
  29. EuroIntervention. 2019 Oct 04;15(9):e804-e811 [PMID: 31217142]
  30. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 28;15(6):670-672 [PMID: 35219615]

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Prospective Studies
Coronary Occlusion
Coronary Angiography
Treatment Outcome
Chronic Disease
Predictive Value of Tests
Coronary Artery Disease
Risk Factors
Vascular System Injuries
Registries

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0perforationcoronaryclinical195%CI:arteryCTOscore+1pointOR0PCIPROGRESS-CTOchronictotalpercutaneousinterventionindependentlyassociatedmodelbootstrappinguse2curvegoodvalidationpredictingBACKGROUND:CoronaryfearedcomplicationocclusionoftenleadsseriousadverseeventsAIMS:soughtdevelopriskpredictpatientsundergoingMETHODS:analysedangiographicparameters9618PCIsProspectiveGlobalRegistryStudyChronicTotalOcclusionInterventionLogisticregressionpredictionmodellingusedidentifyvariablesinternallyvalidatedClinicaldefinedrequiringtreatmentRESULTS:incidence38%n=367Fivefactorsincludedscore:patientage≥65yearsoddsratio[OR]79confidenceinterval[CI]:37-233moderate/severecalcification8541-242blunt/nostump4510-192antegradedissectionre-entry4361-369retrogradeapproach+2points40295-546resultingshowedacceptableperformancereceiveroperatingcharacteristicROCarea[AUC]:741712-0773Hosmer-Lemeshowtestindicatedfitp=0991internaldemonstratedagreementobservedAUC:736bias-corrected706-0767CONCLUSIONS:mayusefultoolDevelopmentscoringsystemocclusions:

Similar Articles

Cited By