Validation of a Scale on Society's Attitudes towards the Sexuality of Women with Intellectual Disabilities-Survey Study.

Mónica Rojas-Chaves, Manuel Lucas-Matheu, Gracia Castro-Luna, Tesifón Parrón-Carreño, Bruno José Nievas-Soriano
Author Information
  1. Mónica Rojas-Chaves: Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine Department, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.
  2. Manuel Lucas-Matheu: Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine Department, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.
  3. Gracia Castro-Luna: Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine Department, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID
  4. Tesifón Parrón-Carreño: Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine Department, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID
  5. Bruno José Nievas-Soriano: Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine Department, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main aim of this study was to design and validate a questionnaire in Spanish to acknowledge the perception of the sexuality of women with intellectual disabilities. We sought to cover specific spheres of sexuality, such as sexual capacity, decision-making capacity, sexual disinhibition, and sexual education and quality of life.
METHODS: A questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. Validation was performed using content validation through a panel of experts; construct validation was performed using exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses; reliability tests were also performed, using Cronbach's Alpha and the two-halves test.
RESULTS: Two-hundred forty-four participants pilot tested the initial 34-item questionnaire. After content validation and exploratory factorial analysis, the resulting 10-item questionnaire showed four domains, with Cronbach's Alpha values between 0.69 and 0.82. Confirmatory factorial analysis confirmed the domains, and the model's goodness-of-fit tests were adequate.
CONCLUSIONS: The final ten-item scale developed in this research proved to be a valid and reliable instrument, as it has good psychometric properties of both validity and reliability. Thus, researchers interested in investigating the social perception of the sexuality of women with intellectual disabilities can use this tool. Future research can extend the validity of this scale to other languages and settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S809-S815 [PMID: 31040479]
  2. Arch Physiother. 2022 May 16;12(1):14 [PMID: 35570310]
  3. Gac Sanit. 2018 Jan - Feb;32(1):96-100 [PMID: 28274622]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 08;18(12): [PMID: 34200979]
  5. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Sep;33(5):962-975 [PMID: 32100403]
  6. BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):1965 [PMID: 34717594]
  7. Int J Family Med. 2013;2013:642472 [PMID: 24455249]
  8. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Oct;23(4):1330-1343 [PMID: 33657931]
  9. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Jul;35(4):988-1000 [PMID: 34132002]
  10. Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55 [PMID: 28029643]
  11. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007 Sep;32(3):214-21 [PMID: 17885900]
  12. Public Health Rev. 2017 Jul 14;38:15 [PMID: 29450087]
  13. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020 Feb;64(2):131-157 [PMID: 31808223]
  14. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Feb 17;18(1):10 [PMID: 32066450]
  15. J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12086 [PMID: 31541525]
  16. Sex Disabil. 2017;35(1):21-38 [PMID: 28250541]
  17. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Jan;62(1):72-80 [PMID: 29159891]
  18. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Nov;32(6):1558-1566 [PMID: 31397044]
  19. Sex Disabil. 2019 Oct;37(4):541-557 [PMID: 33005065]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 13;17(8): [PMID: 32295030]
  21. Am J Prev Med. 2022 Jun;62(6):895-902 [PMID: 35184946]
  22. Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):409-428 [PMID: 29869222]
  23. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;54(6):381-390 [PMID: 27893317]
  24. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jan;33(1):51-66 [PMID: 29532978]
  25. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3065-3076 [PMID: 31017326]
  26. Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Jul;90:80-91 [PMID: 31082682]
  27. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009 Aug;47(4):249-62 [PMID: 19650680]
  28. J Sex Res. 2020 Nov-Dec;57(9):1202-1216 [PMID: 31276427]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Reproducibility of Results
Quality of Life
Intellectual Disability
Surveys and Questionnaires
Psychometrics
Sexuality
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0questionnairesexualityvalidationintellectualsexualperformedusingfactorialscaleperceptionwomendisabilitiescapacitydevelopedValidationcontentexploratoryreliabilitytestsCronbach'sAlphaanalysisdomains0researchvaliditycanBACKGROUND:mainaimstudydesignvalidateSpanishacknowledgesoughtcoverspecificspheresdecision-makingdisinhibitioneducationqualitylifeMETHODS:basedliteraturereviewpanelexpertsconstructconfirmatoryanalysesalsotwo-halvestestRESULTS:Two-hundredforty-fourparticipantspilottestedinitial34-itemresulting10-itemshowedfourvalues6982Confirmatoryconfirmedmodel'sgoodness-of-fitadequateCONCLUSIONS:finalten-itemprovedvalidreliableinstrumentgoodpsychometricpropertiesThusresearchersinterestedinvestigatingsocialusetoolFutureextendlanguagessettingsScaleSociety'sAttitudestowardsSexualityWomenIntellectualDisabilities-SurveyStudydisability

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.