A Retrospective Taiwanese-Population-Based Clinical Study on Determining the Efficacy and Safety of Disposable Circumcision Anastomat.

An-Chi Chou, Chun-Yo Laih, Fang-Yu Ku
Author Information
  1. An-Chi Chou: Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
  2. Chun-Yo Laih: Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan.
  3. Fang-Yu Ku: Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.

Abstract

Traditional approaches for male circumcision are tedious and could lead to complications such as peri-/postoperative pain, bleeding, and infection. Thus, for the first time, we investigated the surgical outcomes of recently the discovered Disposable Circumcision Anastomat Type A (Dongguan ZSR Biomedical Technology Company Ltd., China), a disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD), in terms of the operation time, surgical complexity, safety, satisfaction, and aesthetic outcomes and most importantly the prognostic factors for postoperative infection. A total of 394 individuals were circumcised, with a mean age, body mass index (BMI), stretched penile length (SPL), and penile circumference of 30.1 ± 7.05 years, 25.47 ± 4.73, 10.12 ± 1.61, and 7 ± 0.73 cm, respectively. Associated comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (6.09%), hypertension (2.03%), gout (1.02%), end-stage renal disease (ESRD, 0.25%), and HIV (0.25%). The mean operation time, average postoperative bleeding, and wound infection rate was 31.4 ± 9.96 min, 2.54%, and 9.39%, respectively. The mean VAS postoperative pain scores at D0 and D1 were 4.4 ± 2.4 and 1.9 ± 1.6, respectively. Moreover, 1.27% of subjects required reoperation, and a 2.03% rate of instrument malfunction was noted. The significant factors associated with the post-operative infection group were age (p = 0.0313), BW (p = 0.0081), BMI (p = 0.0026), penile circumference (p = 0.0343), and DM (p ≤ 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed only DM as a statistically significant factor (p < 0.001). Our box−whisker plot revealed no significant difference between the HbA1c level of infection (Hb1Ac = 7.77 ± 1.39) and non-infection groups (Hb1Ac = 6.92 ± 1.84). However, a trend of higher glycemic index in the infection group was observed. Conclusively, DSCD could be an effective and safe alternative to performing circumcision. However, in the population with advanced aging, phimosis, elevated BMI, and DM (HbA1C > 9%), users should be highly cautious due to the increased risk of infection, dehiscence, and hematoma.

Keywords

References

  1. Br J Urol. 1996 Feb;77(2):291-5 [PMID: 8800902]
  2. Popul Health Metr. 2016 Mar 01;14:4 [PMID: 26933388]
  3. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016 Feb;29:63-7 [PMID: 26673958]
  4. Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):585-6 [PMID: 22926180]
  5. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Feb 11;7(1):11 [PMID: 33574340]
  6. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;11(1):14-5 [PMID: 21183146]
  7. Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 31;12:642899 [PMID: 33868148]
  8. Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100288 [PMID: 33765458]
  9. Int J Urol. 2013 Aug;20(8):769-75 [PMID: 23573952]
  10. Diabetes Care. 2018 Mar;41(3):513-521 [PMID: 29330152]
  11. Asian J Androl. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):453-6 [PMID: 24759586]
  12. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Jun;39(3):788-97 [PMID: 19139986]
  13. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1996 Feb;12(1):62-8 [PMID: 8677186]
  14. Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100315 [PMID: 33545503]
  15. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):88-99 [PMID: 26503187]
  16. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jul 03;18(7): [PMID: 28671607]
  17. S Afr Med J. 2012 Feb 23;102(3 Pt 1):126-8 [PMID: 22380898]
  18. Asian J Androl. 2017 May-Jun;19(3):362-367 [PMID: 26975486]
  19. Front Public Health. 2019 Jan 31;7:4 [PMID: 30766863]
  20. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Mar 20;20:454-62 [PMID: 24647226]
  21. Urology. 2020 Sep;143:206-211 [PMID: 32593627]
  22. Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Nov;10(11):4152-4160 [PMID: 34984181]
  23. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Apr;48(4):465-73 [PMID: 26797875]
  24. Eur Urol. 2002 Nov;42(5):426-31 [PMID: 12429149]
  25. Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:17-25 [PMID: 28522221]
  26. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 May 1;57(1):e7-12 [PMID: 21346586]
  27. BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):338-40 [PMID: 18005214]
  28. Hum Immunol. 2014 Dec;75(12):1192-6 [PMID: 25446401]
  29. Urol J. 2017 Aug 29;14(5):5013-5017 [PMID: 28853107]
  30. Mo Med. 2014 May-Jun;111(3):222-30 [PMID: 25011345]
  31. BMC Urol. 2010 Feb 16;10:2 [PMID: 20158883]
  32. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0227623 [PMID: 31940422]
  33. Diabete Metab. 1992 May-Jun;18(3):187-201 [PMID: 1397473]
  34. J Urol. 2014 May;191(5):1411-5 [PMID: 24423436]
  35. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014 Aug;25(4):331-6 [PMID: 23537074]
  36. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jul-Aug;43(4):736-745 [PMID: 27819755]
  37. Urology. 2021 Jun;152:25-34 [PMID: 33545206]
  38. Br J Nutr. 2010 Jun;103(12):1830-5 [PMID: 20205963]
  39. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015 Jun;48(6):577-82 [PMID: 25831203]
  40. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2017 Nov;23(11):1007-1013 [PMID: 29738167]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0±01infectionp=circumcision42timepostoperativemeanBMIpenile7respectively69significantDMpainbleedingsurgicaloutcomesDisposableCircumcisionAnastomatdisposablesuturedeviceoperationfactorsageindexcircumference73diabetesmellitus03%25%rategroup001revealedHb1AcHoweverHbA1CTraditionalapproachesmaletediousleadcomplicationsperi-/postoperativeThusfirstinvestigatedrecentlydiscoveredTypeDongguanZSRBiomedicalTechnologyCompanyLtdChinaDCSDtermscomplexitysafetysatisfactionaestheticimportantlyprognostictotal394individualscircumcisedbodymassstretchedlengthSPL3005years2547101261cmAssociatedcomorbiditiesincluded09%hypertensiongout02%end-stagerenaldiseaseESRDHIVaveragewound3196min54%39%VASscoresD0D1Moreover27%subjectsrequiredreoperationinstrumentmalfunctionnotedassociatedpost-operative0313BW008100260343Multivariateanalysesstatisticallyfactor<box−whiskerplotdifferenceHbA1clevel7739non-infectiongroups9284trendhigherglycemicobservedConclusivelyDSCDeffectivesafealternativeperformingpopulationadvancedagingphimosiselevated>9%usershighlycautiousdueincreasedriskdehiscencehematomaRetrospectiveTaiwanese-Population-BasedClinicalStudyDeterminingEfficacySafety

Similar Articles

Cited By