Use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Among Public Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Juliana Pontes Soares, Rayssa Horacio Lopes, Paula Beatriz de Souza Mendonça, Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva, Cláudia Cristiane Filgueira Martins Rodrigues, Janete Lima de Castro
Author Information
  1. Juliana Pontes Soares: Postgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Rayssa Horacio Lopes: Postgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. ORCID
  3. Paula Beatriz de Souza Mendonça: Postgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil. ORCID
  4. Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva: Technical School of Health of Cajazeiras, Federal University of Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Brazil. ORCID
  5. Cláudia Cristiane Filgueira Martins Rodrigues: School of Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. ORCID
  6. Janete Lima de Castro: Postgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: burnout syndrome is a chronic response to stressors in the workplace. It is characterized by emotional exhaustion and physical and mental burnout and may lead to high employee turnover, work absenteeism, and increased occupational accidents. Most studies use the Maslach burnout Inventory (MBI) to identify burnout and implement preventive actions and treatments.
OBJECTIVE: This study presents a scoping review protocol to identify and map studies that used MBI to assess burnout syndrome in health care professionals working in public health services.
METHODS: This scoping review protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual, and this protocol consists of 6 stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, data extraction and coding, analysis and interpretation of results, and consultation with stakeholders. We will conduct searches in Embase, LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science databases, and gray literature. The main research question is as follows: how is MBI used to identify burnout syndrome in health care professionals working in public health services? Inclusion criteria will comprise qualitative and quantitative studies using MBI to identify burnout syndrome in health care professionals working in public health services and no restrictions in language and publication dates. Data will be extracted using a spreadsheet adapted from the Joanna Briggs Institute model. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, respectively. The consultation with stakeholders will be essential for increasing the knowledge about MBI, identifying new evidence, and developing future strategies to guide public policies preventing burnout syndrome in health care professionals working in public services.
RESULTS: This protocol will guide a scoping review to identify and map studies that used MBI to identify burnout syndrome in health care professionals working in public health services. The results of this review may be useful to public health care professionals, managers, policymakers, and the general population because these findings will help understand the validated, translated, and adapted versions of MBI and domains, number of items, Likert scales, and cutoff points or the latent profile analysis most used in the literature. Furthermore, possible research gaps may be identified to guide future studies. All information regarding the stages of the scoping review favor its transparency and allow it to be methodologically replicated according to the principles of open science, thereby reducing the risk of bias and data duplication.
CONCLUSIONS: This study may reveal the multiplicity of scales described in the literature and the different forms of assessing burnout syndrome in health care professionals. This study may help to standardize the assessment of burnout syndrome in health care professionals working in public health services and contribute to the discussion and knowledge dissemination about burnout syndrome and mental health in this population.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/42338.

Keywords

References

  1. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Aug 09;26:e3022 [PMID: 30110099]
  2. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e045150 [PMID: 34341033]
  3. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Apr;53(2):194-9 [PMID: 19527366]
  4. Hum Resour Health. 2020 Dec 3;18(1):95 [PMID: 33272284]
  5. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 [PMID: 11148311]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 01;18(3): [PMID: 33535707]
  7. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:747-770 [PMID: 30089228]
  8. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  9. Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69 [PMID: 20854677]
  10. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021 Aug 30;131(7-8):626-632 [PMID: 34142768]
  11. Acta Biomed. 2018 Nov 28;90(1):24-30 [PMID: 30889151]
  12. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0195039 [PMID: 29694375]
  13. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Oct;92(7):1013-1021 [PMID: 31111207]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 23;16(19): [PMID: 31547533]
  15. BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e050380 [PMID: 33972345]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):264 [PMID: 28302088]
  17. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  18. BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):1607 [PMID: 31791282]
  19. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Feb 1;75(3):147-152 [PMID: 29183877]
  20. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206840 [PMID: 30418984]
  21. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 1;11(11):e42338 [PMID: 36318252]
  22. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6 [PMID: 26134548]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthburnoutcaresyndromepublicprofessionalsMBIwillstudiesidentifyworkingservicesmayreviewstudyscopingprotocolusedBurnoutmentalMaslachidentifyingresearchdataanalysisliteratureusingguideworkplaceoccupationalInventorymapJoannaBriggsInstitutequestionresultsconsultationstakeholdersqualitativeadaptedknowledgefuturepopulationhelpscalesBACKGROUND:chronicresponsestressorscharacterizedemotionalexhaustionphysicalleadhighemployeeturnoverworkabsenteeismincreasedaccidentsuseimplementpreventiveactionstreatmentsOBJECTIVE:presentsassessMETHODS:followsreviewers'manualconsists6stages:relevantselectionextractioncodinginterpretationconductsearchesEmbaseLILACSPubMed/MEDLINEPsycINFOScopusWebSciencedatabasesgraymainfollows:services?InclusioncriteriacomprisequantitativerestrictionslanguagepublicationdatesDataextractedspreadsheetmodelQuantitativeanalyzeddescriptivestatisticsthematicrespectivelyessentialincreasingnewevidencedevelopingstrategiespoliciespreventingRESULTS:usefulmanagerspolicymakersgeneralfindingsunderstandvalidatedtranslatedversionsdomainsnumberitemsLikertcutoffpointslatentprofileFurthermorepossiblegapsidentifiedinformationregardingstagesfavortransparencyallowmethodologicallyreplicatedaccordingprinciplesopensciencetherebyreducingriskbiasduplicationCONCLUSIONS:revealmultiplicitydescribeddifferentformsassessingstandardizeassessmentcontributediscussiondisseminationINTERNATIONALREGISTEREDREPORTIDENTIFIERIRRID:DERR1-102196/42338UseAmongPublicHealthCareProfessionals:ProtocolScopingReviewinventoryprofessionalpersonnelworkerspolicymakerpsychologicalwell-beingstress

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)