Evidence of air pollution-related ocular signs and altered inflammatory cytokine profile of the ocular surface in Beijing.

Dalan Jing, Xiaodan Jiang, Peng Zhou, Xiaotong Ren, Jie Su, Ran Hao, Mingzhong Zhang, Yu Wan, Xuemin Li
Author Information
  1. Dalan Jing: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  2. Xiaodan Jiang: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  3. Peng Zhou: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  4. Xiaotong Ren: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  5. Jie Su: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  6. Ran Hao: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  7. Mingzhong Zhang: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  8. Yu Wan: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  9. Xuemin Li: Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China. lxmlxm66@sina.com.

Abstract

We evaluated how different degrees of air pollution affect the ocular surface of a cohort of human subjects in Beijing by correlating in-patient test outcomes with tear cytokines. A cross-sectional study involving 221 volunteers was carried out in different districts of Beijing. Air pollution indices were recorded for 7 d (including the visit day). The indices recorded were the air quality index (AQI), which is a dimensionless measure that quantitatively describes the state of air quality, concentrations of particulate matter smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and 10 μm (PM10), sulfur dioxide (SO), ozone (O), and nitrogen dioxide (NO). The Ocular Symptom Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire provided. Subsequently, subjects underwent slit-lamp examination, which included meibomian gland examination, conjunctival congestion score, conjunctivochalasis grade, tear meniscus height (TMH), tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), Schirmer I test, and conjunctival impression cytology. The concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukins (IL)-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 in tears were measured by microsphere-based immunoassay analysis. According to the value of the AQI, participants are divided into a slightly polluted (SP) group (n = 103) which the AQI value is less than or equal to 100 and a heavily polluted (HP) group (n = 118) whose AQI value is more than 100. Air pollution is related to ocular discomfort based on tear cytokine concentrations. PM2.5, PM10 and NO were positively correlated with OSDI, MG expressibility, meibum score, meiboscore, conjunctival congestion score, Schirmer I test value, TMH, goblet-cell density, concentrations of IL-6, and VEGF were negatively correlated with TBUT. PM2.5 and PM10 appear to be the major risk factors to the ocular surface, with NO being another important risk factor based on this study. The symptoms and signs of eye discomfort in the SP group were significantly less severe than those in the HP group, and tear cytokine concentrations (IL-6 and VEGF) were lower. Air pollution degrees were significantly correlated with tear cytokine concentrations, indicating an alteration of cytokine balance at the ocular surface under different degrees of air pollution.

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 14;11:235 [PMID: 21492464]
  2. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Oct 24;24:7595-7602 [PMID: 30356032]
  3. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Aug 25;: [PMID: 32964460]
  4. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jan;110(1):39-43 [PMID: 23244657]
  5. Cornea. 2007 May;26(4):431-7 [PMID: 17457192]
  6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jul 16;54(7):4759-65 [PMID: 23722391]
  7. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jun 12;9:3043-50 [PMID: 26109847]
  8. Nat Med. 2003 Jun;9(6):669-76 [PMID: 12778165]
  9. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283 [PMID: 28736335]
  10. Cornea. 2006 Sep;25(8):900-7 [PMID: 17102664]
  11. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Nov 15;163:585-593 [PMID: 30077156]
  12. Exp Eye Res. 2004 Feb;78(2):173-85 [PMID: 14729350]
  13. Cornea. 2013 Apr;32(4):e11-5 [PMID: 22968361]
  14. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Dec;115(12):1753-6 [PMID: 18087595]
  15. Cornea. 2017 May;36(5):605-610 [PMID: 28306598]
  16. Ophthalmologica. 2002 Sep-Oct;216(5):368-71 [PMID: 12424406]
  17. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(3): [PMID: 35162209]
  18. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Oct;81(5):491-4 [PMID: 14510797]
  19. Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1939-1951 [PMID: 27751401]
  20. Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):911-5 [PMID: 18452765]
  21. Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):43-52 [PMID: 27817918]
  22. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Sep 1;57(11):4824-4830 [PMID: 27654409]
  23. Lancet. 2013 Sep 21;382(9897):1039-48 [PMID: 23849322]
  24. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jan 2;60(1):255-264 [PMID: 30649152]
  25. Environ Pollut. 2008 Jan;151(2):362-7 [PMID: 17646040]
  26. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2019 Oct 24;14(4):419-427 [PMID: 31875096]
  27. Clin Physiol. 2001 May;21(3):282-6 [PMID: 11380526]
  28. Environ Res. 2010 May;110(4):372-4 [PMID: 20338555]
  29. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;147(2):198-205. e1 [PMID: 18992869]
  30. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Jan;11(1):37-40 [PMID: 21957371]
  31. Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 25;12(1):6710 [PMID: 35468976]
  32. Environ Pollut. 2017 Dec;231(Pt 2):1232-1244 [PMID: 28939124]
  33. Allergy. 2009 May;64(5):710-7 [PMID: 19220217]
  34. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;56(12):7058-66 [PMID: 26529041]
  35. Eye (Lond). 2011 Apr;25(4):502-10 [PMID: 21252949]
  36. Cornea. 2009 Oct;28(9):1023-7 [PMID: 19724208]
  37. Eur Respir J. 2002 Sep;20(3):763-76 [PMID: 12358357]
  38. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;200:10-15 [PMID: 30552892]
  39. Eye Contact Lens. 2017 May;43(3):192-198 [PMID: 26925537]
  40. Ophthalmologe. 1995 Dec;92(6):802-8 [PMID: 8563428]
  41. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 20;10(11):e0143131 [PMID: 26588473]
  42. Atmos Chem Phys. 2018;18(20):15471-15489 [PMID: 30972111]
  43. Eye (Lond). 2006 Jan;20(1):71-9 [PMID: 15746957]
  44. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):539-574 [PMID: 28736342]
  45. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 1;138(8):867-874 [PMID: 32614410]
  46. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998 Mar;18(2):182-6 [PMID: 9692040]
  47. Mediators Inflamm. 2008;2008:129873 [PMID: 19223981]
  48. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013 Oct;63:78-89 [PMID: 23665308]
  49. Environ Res. 2014 May;131:59-63 [PMID: 24657517]
  50. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21 [PMID: 10815152]
  51. Circulation. 2004 Jun 1;109(21):2655-71 [PMID: 15173049]
  52. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Oct;17(10):656-672 [PMID: 32382149]
  53. Ophthalmologica. 1999;213(2):103-9 [PMID: 9885386]
  54. Eur Respir J. 2013 Aug;42(2):304-13 [PMID: 23314899]
  55. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jun;143(6):1979-1987 [PMID: 31176380]
  56. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(31):e16547 [PMID: 31374018]

Grants

  1. 7202229/Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality

MeSH Term

Humans
Nitrogen Dioxide
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Cross-Sectional Studies
Beijing
Interleukin-6
Tears
Meibomian Glands
Air Pollution
Dry Eye Syndromes
Particulate Matter

Chemicals

Nitrogen Dioxide
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Interleukin-6
Particulate Matter

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0oculartearconcentrationsairpollutioncytokinesurfaceAQIvaluegroupdifferentdegreesBeijingtestAirPM25PM10NOconjunctivalscoreVEGFIL-6correlatedsubjectsstudyindicesrecordedqualitydioxideOSDIexaminationcongestionTMHTBUTSchirmerfactorpollutedSPless100HPdiscomfortbasedrisksignssignificantlyevaluatedaffectcohorthumancorrelatingin-patientoutcomescytokinescross-sectionalinvolving221volunteerscarrieddistricts7dincludingvisitdayindexdimensionlessmeasurequantitativelydescribesstateparticulatemattersmaller25 μm10 μmsulfurSOozoneOnitrogenOcularSymptomDiseaseIndexquestionnaireprovidedSubsequentlyunderwentslit-lampincludedmeibomianglandconjunctivochalasisgrademeniscusheightbreakuptimecornealfluoresceinstainingCFSimpressioncytologyvascularendothelialgrowthinterleukinsIL-1βIL-8tearsmeasuredmicrosphere-basedimmunoassayanalysisAccordingparticipantsdividedslightlyn = 103equalheavilyn = 118whoserelatedpositivelyMGexpressibilitymeibummeiboscoregoblet-celldensitynegativelyappearmajorfactorsanotherimportantsymptomseyeseverelowerindicatingalterationbalanceEvidencepollution-relatedalteredinflammatoryprofile

Similar Articles

Cited By