Acoustic signal dominance in the multimodal communication of a nocturnal mammal.

Chun-Mian Zhang, Cong-Nan Sun, Jeffrey R Lucas, Jiang Feng, Ting-Lei Jiang
Author Information
  1. Chun-Mian Zhang: Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Normal University, 2555 Jingyue Street, Changchun 130117, China.
  2. Cong-Nan Sun: Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Normal University, 2555 Jingyue Street, Changchun 130117, China.
  3. Jeffrey R Lucas: Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
  4. Jiang Feng: Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Normal University, 2555 Jingyue Street, Changchun 130117, China.
  5. Ting-Lei Jiang: Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Normal University, 2555 Jingyue Street, Changchun 130117, China. ORCID

Abstract

Multimodal communication in animals is common, and is particularly well studied in signals that include both visual and auditory components. Multimodal signals that combine acoustic and olfactory components are less well known. Multimodal communication plays a crucial role in agonistic interactions in many mammals, but relatively little is known about this type of communication in nocturnal mammals. Here, we used male Great Himalayan leaf-nosed bats to investigate multimodal signal function in acoustic and olfactory aggressive displays. We monitored the physiological responses (heart rate [HR]) when was presented with 1 of 3 stimuli: territorial calls, forehead gland odors, and bimodal signals (calls + odors). Results showed that rapidly increased their HR when exposed to any of the 3 stimuli. However, the duration of elevated HR and magnitude of change in HR increased significantly more when acoustic stimuli were presented alone compared with the presentation of olfactory stimuli alone. In contrast, the duration of elevated HR and magnitude of change in HR were significantly higher with bimodal stimuli than with olfactory stimuli alone, but no significant differences were found between the HR response to acoustic and bimodal stimuli. Our previous work showed that acoustic and chemical signals provided different types of information; here we describe experiments investigating the responses to those signals. These results suggest that olfactory and acoustic signals are non-redundant signal components, and that the acoustic component is the dominant modality in male , at least as it related to HR. This study provides the first evidence that acoustic signals dominate over olfactory signals during agonistic interactions in a nocturnal mammal.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb 1;115(2):868-86 [PMID: 26538612]
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Aug 16;376(1831):20200479 [PMID: 34176323]
  3. Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:180-187 [PMID: 30278211]
  4. PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0214640 [PMID: 31042731]
  5. Integr Zool. 2022 Sep;17(5):731-740 [PMID: 33876861]
  6. Behav Ecol. 2008 Nov;19(6):1250-1257 [PMID: 19529816]
  7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Oct;94(5):1809-1829 [PMID: 31250542]
  8. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 7;12(11):e0187512 [PMID: 29112984]
  9. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 May;25(5):292-300 [PMID: 20022401]
  10. PLoS One. 2008 Sep 03;3(9):e3113 [PMID: 18769619]
  11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jul;114:194-200 [PMID: 32320815]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 21;100(2):577-80 [PMID: 12515862]
  13. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e84738 [PMID: 24454745]
  14. R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 15;4(3):161093 [PMID: 28405396]
  15. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 16;10(11):e0142975 [PMID: 26571266]
  16. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44550 [PMID: 22970247]
  17. J Anim Ecol. 2021 Jun;90(6):1455-1465 [PMID: 33666233]
  18. PeerJ. 2017 Aug 1;5:e3643 [PMID: 28785523]
  19. Am Nat. 2005 Aug;166(2):231-45 [PMID: 16032576]
  20. J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):860-7 [PMID: 24170391]
  21. Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 31;9(11): [PMID: 31683710]
  22. Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):855-864 [PMID: 33179726]
  23. Anim Behav. 2008 Sep;76(3):901-910 [PMID: 19727331]
  24. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Mar 22;12:56 [PMID: 29623033]
  25. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Jan 15;237:103-6 [PMID: 23000533]
  26. Eur J Neurosci. 1998 Jan;10(1):20-33 [PMID: 9753110]
  27. Physiol Behav. 1986;37(5):709-15 [PMID: 3774904]
  28. Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1272-3 [PMID: 10084931]
  29. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:1523-1539 [PMID: 23956487]
  30. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190271 [PMID: 32306883]
  31. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022 Mar;1509(1):74-88 [PMID: 34761396]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0acousticsignalsHRolfactorystimulicommunicationMultimodalcomponentsagonisticinteractionsnocturnalmultimodalsignalbimodalalonewellknownmammalsmaleresponsesheartratepresented3callsodorsshowedincreaseddurationelevatedmagnitudechangesignificantlymammalanimalscommonparticularlystudiedincludevisualauditorycombinelessplayscrucialrolemanyrelativelylittletypeusedGreatHimalayanleaf-nosedbatsinvestigatefunctionaggressivedisplaysmonitoredphysiological[HR]1stimuli:territorialforeheadgland+ResultsrapidlyexposedHowevercomparedpresentationcontrasthighersignificantdifferencesfoundresponsepreviousworkchemicalprovideddifferenttypesinformationdescribeexperimentsinvestigatingresultssuggestnon-redundantcomponentdominantmodalityleastrelatedstudyprovidesfirstevidencedominateAcousticdominanceHipposiderosarmigerolfaction

Similar Articles

Cited By