Pathways to recovery model of youth substance misuse in Assam, India.

Anna Madill, Raginie Duara, Sangeeta Goswami, Rebecca Graber, Siobhan Hugh-Jones
Author Information
  1. Anna Madill: School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. ORCID
  2. Raginie Duara: School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  3. Sangeeta Goswami: Institute of Positive Mental Health & Research, Guwahati, Assam, India.
  4. Rebecca Graber: School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
  5. Siobhan Hugh-Jones: School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are global calls for better understanding of substance use disorder (SUD) to inform prevention, risk reduction and treatment of this relapse-prone disorder. Our aim in this article is to understand the pathways to recovery of youth in Assam, India who have suffered SUD.
METHODS: We recruited 15 participants (11 men and 4 women) via two rehabilitation facilities. All are addicts-in-recovery aged 19-24 years. Material was generated through photo-led interviews, analysed using an inductive variant of thematic analysis and the resulting model refined through expert and participant checks.
RESULTS: We present a multiroute, multidirectional pathway to recovery model. It has three phases, Recreational Use, Addiction (Relaxed, Chaotic, Strategic) and Supported Recovery, each phase consisting of cycling between, or transitioning through, a series of stages.
CONCLUSIONS: The model enhances psycho-socio-cultural insights into the experience of risk and recovery, and informs prevention and treatment for youth substance misuse in Assam. This is the first model of its kind and an important public health resource. We discuss the possible transferability of the model to a wider range of contexts.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The model presented was generated through analysis of interviews with addicts-in-recovery. Four of these addicts-in-recovery, and two mental health and rehabilitation service providers, conducted participant and expert checks of the model leading to its improvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Qual Health Res. 2021 Dec;31(14):2571-2584 [PMID: 34581637]
  2. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Oct;33(3):221-8 [PMID: 17889294]
  3. Behav Brain Res. 2020 May 27;386:112598 [PMID: 32184156]
  4. J Health Psychol. 2022 Jan;27(1):69-80 [PMID: 32693631]
  5. Indian J Med Res. 2019 Jun;149(6):689-692 [PMID: 31496520]
  6. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016 Feb 28;5(3):e30342 [PMID: 27803893]
  7. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Aug;46(8):1603-1615 [PMID: 35994040]
  8. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2020 Jul-Sep;19(3):490-502 [PMID: 30633657]
  9. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan-Mar;59(1):111-118 [PMID: 28529370]
  10. J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(6):840-852 [PMID: 29105490]
  11. Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(Suppl 2):229-239 [PMID: 33386320]
  12. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(4):256-72 [PMID: 19093663]
  13. Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):541-542 [PMID: 32085820]
  14. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Sep 1;154:1-13 [PMID: 26072219]
  15. Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1930-1944 [PMID: 35716082]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 26;12:825 [PMID: 23013114]
  17. Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct-Dec;58(4):387-393 [PMID: 28196995]
  18. Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):318-328 [PMID: 36349556]
  19. Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Dec;41(6):1319-20 [PMID: 22968493]
  20. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;54(4):405-414 [PMID: 30607452]
  21. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Sep;4(Suppl 3):S233-8 [PMID: 25364595]
  22. Lancet. 2007 Apr 14;369(9569):1302-1313 [PMID: 17434406]
  23. Indian J Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;42(3):262-6 [PMID: 21407954]
  24. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Sep 27;13(1):35 [PMID: 30261888]

MeSH Term

Male
Humans
Female
Adolescent
Substance-Related Disorders
Mental Health
India

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0modelrecoverysubstancedisorderyouthAssamaddicts-in-recoveryhealthSUDpreventionrisktreatmentIndiatworehabilitationgeneratedinterviewsexpertparticipantchecksmisusementalINTRODUCTION:globalcallsbetterunderstandinguseinformreduction andrelapse-proneaimarticleunderstandpathwayssufferedMETHODS:recruited15participants11men and4womenviafacilitiesaged19-24yearsMaterialphoto-ledanalysedusinginductivevariantthematicanalysis andresultingrefinedRESULTS:presentmultiroutemultidirectionalpathwaythreephasesRecreationalUseAddictionRelaxedChaoticStrategic andSupportedRecoveryphaseconsistingcyclingtransitioningseriesstagesCONCLUSIONS:enhancespsycho-socio-culturalinsightsexperienceinformsfirstkindimportantpublicresourcediscusspossibletransferabilitywiderrangecontextsPATIENTORPUBLICCONTRIBUTION:presentedanalysisFourserviceprovidersconductedleadingimprovementPathwaysLMICaddictionabusevisualmethods

Similar Articles

Cited By