Determination of Markers of Successful Implementation of Mental Health Apps for Young People: Systematic Review.

Holly Alice Bear, Lara Ayala Nunes, John DeJesus, Shaun Liverpool, Bettina Moltrecht, Lakshmi Neelakantan, Elinor Harriss, Edward Watkins, Mina Fazel
Author Information
  1. Holly Alice Bear: Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Lara Ayala Nunes: Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. ORCID
  3. John DeJesus: Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada. ORCID
  4. Shaun Liverpool: Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom. ORCID
  5. Bettina Moltrecht: Research Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. ORCID
  6. Lakshmi Neelakantan: Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. ORCID
  7. Elinor Harriss: Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. ORCID
  8. Edward Watkins: School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom. ORCID
  9. Mina Fazel: Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smartphone apps have the potential to address some of the current issues facing service provision for young people's mental health by improving the scalability of evidence-based mental health interventions. However, very few apps have been successfully implemented, and consensus on implementation measurement is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to determine the proportion of evidence-based mental health and well-being apps that have been successfully adopted and sustained in real-world settings. A secondary aim is to establish if key implementation determinants such as coproduction, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and engagement contribute toward successful implementation and longevity.
METHODS: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, an electronic search of 5 databases in 2021 yielded 18,660 results. After full-text screening, 34 articles met the full eligibility criteria, providing data on 29 smartphone apps studied with individuals aged 15 to 25 years.
RESULTS: Of 34 studies, only 10 (29%) studies were identified that were evaluating the effectiveness of 8 existing, commercially available mental health apps, and the remaining 24 (71%) studies reported the development and evaluation of 21 newly developed apps, of which 43% (9/21) were available, commercially or otherwise (eg, in mental health services), at the time of enquiry. Most studies addressed some implementation components including adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and engagement. Factors including high cost, funding constraints, and lengthy research processes impeded implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Without addressing common implementation drivers, there is considerable redundancy in the translation of mobile mental health research findings into practice. Studies should embed implementation strategies from the outset of the planned research, build collaborations with partners already working in the field (academic and commercial) to capitalize on existing interventions and platforms, and modify and evaluate them for local contexts or target problems and populations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021224365; https://tinyurl.com/4umpn85f.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 23;8(1):14923 [PMID: 30353111]
  2. J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Jul;47(7):1363-1372 [PMID: 29349593]
  3. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Jun;50(3):724-740 [PMID: 32057131]
  4. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0239592 [PMID: 32976515]
  5. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Jan 23;5(1):e2 [PMID: 29362209]
  6. J Community Psychol. 2020 Apr;48(3):904-920 [PMID: 31944324]
  7. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 25;21(1):e11752 [PMID: 30681966]
  8. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):928-940 [PMID: 32572961]
  9. Schizophr Bull. 2018 Aug 20;44(5):1010-1020 [PMID: 29939367]
  10. Med Teach. 2021 Jun;43(6):686-693 [PMID: 33645416]
  11. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Apr 28;5(2):e77 [PMID: 27125771]
  12. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 6;8(4):e17767 [PMID: 31926063]
  13. J Technol Behav Sci. 2021;6(2):184-196 [PMID: 32923580]
  14. Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;211(2):65-69 [PMID: 28522435]
  15. J Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;62(4):365-381 [PMID: 29429819]
  16. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16317 [PMID: 32442160]
  17. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):437-438 [PMID: 28384700]
  18. Behav Res Ther. 2020 Nov;134:103723 [PMID: 32920164]
  19. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e14567 [PMID: 31573916]
  20. JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jul 28;7(7):e18990 [PMID: 32720904]
  21. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Jun 26;5(2):e48 [PMID: 29945858]
  22. Arch Dis Child. 2021 Jul;106(7):698-704 [PMID: 33208398]
  23. Front Public Health. 2019 Jul 02;7:178 [PMID: 31312629]
  24. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53 [PMID: 25895742]
  25. Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jul 1;70(7):538-544 [PMID: 30914003]
  26. Internet Interv. 2018 Feb 19;12:1-10 [PMID: 30135763]
  27. Internet Interv. 2016 May;4(2):152-158 [PMID: 27398319]
  28. JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 8;8(11):e31170 [PMID: 34747713]
  29. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  30. Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Dec 1;69(12):1204-1206 [PMID: 30256182]
  31. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;58(1):72-79 [PMID: 30577941]
  32. Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):265-75 [PMID: 25385165]
  33. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 13;7(2):e11443 [PMID: 30758294]
  34. Indian J Psychol Med. 2022 Jul;44(4):399-404 [PMID: 35949633]
  35. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 25;7(6):e14273 [PMID: 31237569]
  36. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020 May;25(2):120-122 [PMID: 32307846]
  37. J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):510-20 [PMID: 22179294]
  38. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;(7):MR000042 [PMID: 26212714]
  39. J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:74-81 [PMID: 33401126]
  40. Psychother Res. 2021 Apr;31(4):443-454 [PMID: 32662323]
  41. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 22;8(5):e17798 [PMID: 32357125]
  42. World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):81-82 [PMID: 35015352]
  43. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 08;6(3):e56 [PMID: 29519775]
  44. Psychol Health. 2020 Sep;35(9):1049-1074 [PMID: 32046499]
  45. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 06;20(6):e199 [PMID: 29875089]
  46. JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Jun 06;4(2):e19 [PMID: 28588005]
  47. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;84(6):544-57 [PMID: 27018530]
  48. World Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;18(3):325-336 [PMID: 31496095]
  49. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;20(4):359-64 [PMID: 17551351]
  50. Behav Res Ther. 2021 Dec;147:103990 [PMID: 34715396]
  51. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 10;7(4):e12210 [PMID: 30969174]
  52. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jan 31;9(1):e30766 [PMID: 35099398]
  53. Schizophr Bull. 2018 Aug 20;44(5):1070-1080 [PMID: 29566206]
  54. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):899-913 [PMID: 32683737]
  55. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  56. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17572 [PMID: 32348255]
  57. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;(11):CD010013 [PMID: 24282112]
  58. JMIR Form Res. 2021 Feb 17;5(2):e21432 [PMID: 33481750]
  59. Behav Ther. 2021 Jan;52(1):170-182 [PMID: 33483115]
  60. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76 [PMID: 20957426]
  61. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 May 14;80(3): [PMID: 31091029]
  62. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 11;20(6):e10141 [PMID: 29891468]
  63. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 20;8(3):e17208 [PMID: 32196462]
  64. Telemed J E Health. 2018 Sep;24(9):710-716 [PMID: 29323626]
  65. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Nov 29;12:131 [PMID: 22123031]
  66. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):226-238 [PMID: 33651952]
  67. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 15;7(8):e14318 [PMID: 31418424]
  68. J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:775-787 [PMID: 32738662]
  69. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 19;6(1):e28300 [PMID: 35044312]
  70. J Altern Complement Med. 2018 May;24(5):505-513 [PMID: 29420050]
  71. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 31;8(7):e15418 [PMID: 32735221]
  72. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e16490 [PMID: 33427682]
  73. Behav Modif. 2022 Jan;46(1):63-89 [PMID: 32844679]
  74. J Am Coll Health. 2022 Jan;70(1):165-173 [PMID: 32150519]

MeSH Term

Humans
Adolescent
Mental Health
Mobile Applications
Telemedicine
Text Messaging
Mental Health Services

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0appsimplementationmentalhealthstudiesresearchmobileevidence-basedinterventionssuccessfullyacceptabilityfeasibilityappropriatenessengagementSystematic34existingcommerciallyavailableincludingBACKGROUND:Smartphonepotentialaddresscurrentissuesfacingserviceprovisionyoungpeople'simprovingscalabilityHoweverimplementedconsensusmeasurementlackingOBJECTIVE:reviewaimsdetermineproportionwell-beingadoptedsustainedreal-worldsettingssecondaryaimestablishkeydeterminantscoproductioncontributetowardsuccessfullongevityMETHODS:FollowingPRISMAPreferredReportingItemsReviewsMeta-Analysesguidelineselectronicsearch5databases2021yielded18660resultsfull-textscreeningarticlesmetfulleligibilitycriteriaprovidingdata29smartphonestudiedindividualsaged1525yearsRESULTS:1029%identifiedevaluatingeffectiveness8remaining2471%reporteddevelopmentevaluation21newlydeveloped43%9/21otherwiseegservicestimeenquiryaddressedcomponentsadoptionFactorshighcostfundingconstraintslengthyprocessesimpededCONCLUSIONS:WithoutaddressingcommondriversconsiderableredundancytranslationfindingspracticeStudiesembedstrategiesoutsetplannedbuildcollaborationspartnersalreadyworkingfieldacademiccommercialcapitalizeplatformsmodifyevaluatelocalcontextstargetproblemspopulationsTRIALREGISTRATION:PROSPEROCRD42021224365https://tinyurlcom/4umpn85fDeterminationMarkersSuccessfulImplementationMentalHealthAppsYoungPeople:Reviewadolescentsciencephonesmartphones

Similar Articles

Cited By