Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review.

Liv Fegran, Wilma Ten Ham-Baloyi, Mariann Fossum, Olav Johannes Hovland, Joanne R Naidoo, Dalena R M van Rooyen, Ellen Sejersted, Nastasja Robstad
Author Information
  1. Liv Fegran: University of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.
  2. Wilma Ten Ham-Baloyi: Nelson Mandela University, Ocean Sciences Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. ORCID
  3. Mariann Fossum: University of Agder, Campus Grimstad, Grimstad, Norway. ORCID
  4. Olav Johannes Hovland: University of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway. ORCID
  5. Joanne R Naidoo: Nelson Mandela University, North Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
  6. Dalena R M van Rooyen: Nelson Mandela University, Ocean Sciences Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
  7. Ellen Sejersted: University of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.
  8. Nastasja Robstad: University of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway. ORCID

Abstract

AIM: To map the evidence of the simulation debriefing phase in simulation activities of nursing education, to address and inform clinical teaching and learning in nursing.
DESIGN: A scoping review.
METHODS: A systematic review of literature published between 2008-2021 was conducted using CINAHL & ERIC, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and JBI Evidence synthesis. Inclusion criteria were primary studies published in English on simulation debriefing at all levels in nursing education.
RESULTS: Of 140 included references, only 80% (N =���112) framed simulation debriefing theoretically either by specific theories/models or as a literature review of the topic. A variety of simulation debriefing methods were identified; however, debriefing methods were only described in 79% (N =���110) of the references. There appears to be a gap in consensus concerning the theoretical or methodological frameworks characterizing simulation debriefing in nursing education. The majority of studies (86%) were conducted at a bachelor's degree level (N =���121).

Keywords

References

  1. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:42-7 [PMID: 27429402]
  2. Comput Inform Nurs. 2015 Dec;33(12):538-45 [PMID: 26587701]
  3. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):361-6 [PMID: 26753294]
  4. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  5. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5:Article17 [PMID: 18454731]
  6. Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):55-60 [PMID: 31743312]
  7. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:219-24 [PMID: 27125176]
  8. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Jan 13;43:102698 [PMID: 32004851]
  9. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3 [PMID: 27366130]
  10. Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):209-17 [PMID: 27254527]
  11. Simul Healthc. 2016 Feb;11(1):32-40 [PMID: 26836466]
  12. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 Sep/Oct;37(5):262-268 [PMID: 27740557]
  13. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2020 Apr 09;41:e20190182 [PMID: 32294726]
  14. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):372-6 [PMID: 23890542]
  15. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Mar;52:102994 [PMID: 33799095]
  16. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104345 [PMID: 32135455]
  17. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:51-56 [PMID: 28012979]
  18. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Jul;25:104-110 [PMID: 28577417]
  19. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):109-14 [PMID: 19476076]
  20. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6 [PMID: 26134548]
  21. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  22. Simul Healthc. 2015 Apr;10(2):106-15 [PMID: 25710312]
  23. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Aug;47:102834 [PMID: 32927335]
  24. Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1217-1233 [PMID: 36352489]
  25. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  26. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Apr;35(2):52-8 [PMID: 21440811]
  27. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Jun;51(6):326-33 [PMID: 22495923]
  28. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Feb;97:104709 [PMID: 33352351]
  29. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jun;34(6):e58-63 [PMID: 24169444]
  30. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Aug 13;5(2):61-72 [PMID: 35519834]
  31. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):334 [PMID: 31488113]

MeSH Term

Education, Nursing
Learning
Clinical Competence
Computer Simulation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0simulationdebriefingnursingrevieweducationclinicalteachinglearningscopingliteraturepublishedconductedstudiesreferencesmethodstheoreticalAIM:mapevidencephaseactivitiesaddressinformDESIGN:METHODS:systematic2008-2021usingCINAHL&ERICMEDLINEEMBASEAPAPsycInfoCochraneLibraryJBIEvidencesynthesisInclusioncriteriaprimaryEnglishlevelsRESULTS:140included80%N =���112framedtheoreticallyeitherspecifictheories/modelstopicvarietyidentifiedhoweverdescribed79%N =���110appearsgapconsensusconcerningmethodologicalframeworkscharacterizingmajority86%bachelor'sdegreelevelN =���121Simulationparteducation:framework

Similar Articles

Cited By