The effects of health education intervention on promoting knowledge, beliefs and preventive behaviors on brucellosis among rural population in Nagpur district of Maharashtra state, India.

Satish L Ghugey, Maninder S Setia, Jyotsna S Deshmukh
Author Information
  1. Satish L Ghugey: Department of Community Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Mission Institute of Health Sciences, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  2. Maninder S Setia: Department of Epidemiology, Mahatma Gandhi Mission Institute of Health Sciences, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
  3. Jyotsna S Deshmukh: Department of Community Medicine, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Mominpura, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

Introduction: brucellosis is one of the most common zoonosis diseases in developing and undeveloped countries, with adverse socio-economic status and animal and human health. The essential element for effective prevention and control of brucellosis is to improve the community's Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) through Health Education Intervention (HEI).
Aim: To assess health education intervention's effect on promoting knowledge, beliefs, and preventive behaviors on brucellosis among rural populations in Nagpur district, Maharashtra, India.
Methods and Materials: 382 subjects over 18 years with a history of animal contact or consuming animal products were randomly selected. Data were collected through questionnaires and checklists. The pre-test was implemented and followed by HEI. The post-test was conducted after 45 to 60 days. For the attitude five-point Likert scale and knowledge and practice, a two-point assessment scale [yes, no] was applied. SPSS was used to analyze paired -test, and < 0.05 was considered significant.
Result: Of 382 subjects, 300 (78.5%) were male, and the mean age of 42.15 ± 13.72. Before HEI, 18 (5%) subjects heard about brucellosis. After HEI, reduction in the risk behaviors practices like raw milk consumption ( < 0.0001), assisted animal delivery without gown ( = 0.002), throwing animal birth products in the dustbin ( < 0.0001) were statistically significant. After implementing HEI, subjects were more aware of animal and human brucellosis signs/symptoms ( < 0.0001). Awareness of disease transmission route ( < 0.0001) and up-gradation in knowledge ( < 0.0001) were statistically significant among subjects after HEI.
Conclusions: HEI substantially affects KAP and changes community behaviors to prevent brucellosis transmission. The authors recommend implementing HEI in the community to prevent brucellosis.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 28;10(7):e0132206 [PMID: 26218368]
  2. J Biosci. 2008 Nov;33(4):539-47 [PMID: 19208979]
  3. East Afr J Public Health. 2009 Apr;6(1):47-50 [PMID: 20000064]
  4. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 May 21;14(5):e0008071 [PMID: 32437346]
  5. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Feb 07;35:33 [PMID: 32537048]
  6. Rev Sci Tech. 1998 Dec;17(3):781-5 [PMID: 9850550]
  7. Indian J Community Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;40(3):163-7 [PMID: 26170539]
  8. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007 Oct;25(4):387-90 [PMID: 18087091]
  9. Emerg Health Threats J. 2011 Sep 28;4:7361 [PMID: 24149042]
  10. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2020 May 31;10(1):1769531 [PMID: 33224446]
  11. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020 Jan;52(1):387-396 [PMID: 31620958]
  12. Harefuah. 1999 Nov 15;137(10):454-6, 511, 510 [PMID: 10959343]
  13. J Vector Borne Dis. 2005 Mar;42(1):30-5 [PMID: 15999459]
  14. Postgrad Med J. 2021 Dec;97(1154):777-781 [PMID: 32913034]
  15. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Apr 29;13:192 [PMID: 23627258]
  16. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000 Jul-Aug;6(4):337-47 [PMID: 10905966]
  17. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Dec;87(6):1105-11 [PMID: 23091197]
  18. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Feb;10(2):1028-1033 [PMID: 34041116]
  19. J Indian Med Assoc. 2000 Apr;98(4):170-1 [PMID: 11016178]
  20. Arch Public Health. 2017 Sep 11;75:34 [PMID: 28904791]
  21. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1986 Jan;29(1):53-60 [PMID: 3781612]
  22. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:353-358 [PMID: 32081773]
  23. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 11;9(11): [PMID: 34828587]
  24. Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Dec;24(3):879-85 [PMID: 16642758]
  25. East Mediterr Health J. 2000 Jul;6(4):796-807 [PMID: 11794086]
  26. Pan Afr Med J. 2013 Nov 17;16:103 [PMID: 24876892]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HEIbrucellosis0animal<healthsubjects0001knowledgebehaviorsamongsignificantonezoonosishumanKAPeducationpromotingbeliefspreventiveruralNagpurdistrictMaharashtraIndia38218productsscale5%statisticallyimplementingdiseasetransmissioncommunitypreventIntroduction:Brucellosiscommondiseasesdevelopingundevelopedcountriesadversesocio-economicstatusessentialelementeffectivepreventioncontrolimprovecommunity'sKnowledgeAttitudePracticeHealthEducationInterventionAim:assessintervention'seffectpopulationsMethodsMaterials:yearshistorycontactconsumingrandomlyselectedDatacollectedquestionnaireschecklistspre-testimplementedfollowedpost-testconducted4560daysattitudefive-pointLikertpracticetwo-pointassessment[yesno]appliedSPSSusedanalyzepaired-test05consideredResult:30078malemeanage4215±1372heardreductionriskpracticeslikerawmilkconsumptionassisteddeliverywithoutgown=002throwingbirthdustbinawaresigns/symptomsAwarenessrouteup-gradationConclusions:substantiallyaffectschangesauthorsrecommendeffectsinterventionpopulationstateOccupationalpublic

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.