Experience and social factors influence movement and habitat selection in scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah) reintroduced into Chad.

M M Majaliwa, L F Hughey, J A Stabach, M Songer, K Whyle, A E A Alhashmi, M Al Remeithi, R Pusey, H A Chaibo, A Ngari Walsoumon, M Hassan Hatcha, T Wacher, C Ngaba, J Newby, P Leimgruber, K Mertes
Author Information
  1. M M Majaliwa: Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  2. L F Hughey: Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  3. J A Stabach: Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  4. M Songer: Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  5. K Whyle: Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  6. A E A Alhashmi: Terrestrial and Marine Biodiversity, Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  7. M Al Remeithi: Terrestrial and Marine Biodiversity, Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  8. R Pusey: Terrestrial and Marine Biodiversity, Environment Agency, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  9. H A Chaibo: Direction de la Conservation de la Faune et des Aires Protégées, N'Djamena, Chad.
  10. A Ngari Walsoumon: Direction de la Conservation de la Faune et des Aires Protégées, N'Djamena, Chad.
  11. M Hassan Hatcha: Direction de la Conservation de la Faune et des Aires Protégées, N'Djamena, Chad.
  12. T Wacher: Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
  13. C Ngaba: SaharaConservation, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France.
  14. J Newby: SaharaConservation, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France.
  15. P Leimgruber: Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  16. K Mertes: Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA. mertesk@si.edu.

Abstract

Reintroduced animals-especially those raised in captivity-are faced with the unique challenge of navigating a wholly unfamiliar environment, and often make erratic or extensive movements after release. Naïveté to the reintroduction landscape can be costly, e.g., through increased energy expenditure, greater exposure to predation, and reduced opportunities to forage. Integration with an extant population may provide opportunities for social information transfer. However, in the absence of interactions with residents, it is unclear how individual and social learning may affect an animal's ability to track resources in an unfamiliar landscape. We use integrated step selection functions (iSSFs) to address these knowledge gaps, by evaluating the extent to which environmental factors, individual experience (time since release), and social information-sharing (group size) influence movement decisions by scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah) reintroduced into their native range for the first time in ca. 30 years. We found that both experience and social factors influenced the habitat selection and movement behavior of reintroduced oryx. Of four candidate iSSFs, the model that included environmental, experience, and group size variables performed best in both dry and wet periods. Statistically significant interaction terms between environmental variables and experience were generally larger than similar terms for group size, indicating that experience may affect habitat selection by reintroduced oryx more strongly than social factors. These findings may inform the management of recovering wildlife populations, update widely-held expectations about how released ungulates acclimate to novel landscapes, and demonstrate the utility of long-term monitoring of reintroduced populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 May 7;275(1638):1101-9 [PMID: 18270158]
  2. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0169779 [PMID: 28081571]
  3. Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 05;9(2):880-890 [PMID: 30766677]
  4. J Anim Ecol. 2021 May;90(5):1027-1043 [PMID: 33583036]
  5. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50612 [PMID: 23227192]
  6. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0143046 [PMID: 26605549]
  7. Zoology (Jena). 2012 Dec;115(6):411-6 [PMID: 23036437]
  8. Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3554-65 [PMID: 20120822]
  9. J Exp Biol. 2003 May;206(Pt 9):1471-8 [PMID: 12654886]
  10. Conserv Biol. 2012 Feb;26(1):107-15 [PMID: 21977973]
  11. Physiol Behav. 2017 Aug 1;177:148-154 [PMID: 28431978]
  12. Science. 2014 Jul 25;345(6195):406-12 [PMID: 25061203]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3361-7 [PMID: 19570789]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialexperienceselectionreintroducedmayfactorsoryxenvironmentalgroupsizemovementhabitatunfamiliarreleaselandscapeopportunitiesindividuallearningaffectstepfunctionsiSSFstimeinfluencescimitar-hornedOryxdammahvariablestermspopulationsReintroducedanimals-especiallyraisedcaptivity-arefaceduniquechallengenavigatingwhollyenvironmentoftenmakeerraticextensivemovementsNaïvetéreintroductioncancostlyegincreasedenergyexpendituregreaterexposurepredationreducedforageIntegrationextantpopulationprovideinformationtransferHoweverabsenceinteractionsresidentsunclearanimal'sabilitytrackresourcesuseintegratedaddressknowledgegapsevaluatingextentsinceinformation-sharingdecisionsnativerangefirstca30 yearsfoundinfluencedbehaviorfourcandidatemodelincludedperformedbestdrywetperiodsStatisticallysignificantinteractiongenerallylargersimilarindicatingstronglyfindingsinformmanagementrecoveringwildlifeupdatewidely-heldexpectationsreleasedungulatesacclimatenovellandscapesdemonstrateutilitylong-termmonitoringExperienceChadIntegratedMonitoringPost-releaseReintroductionSeasonalitySocial

Similar Articles

Cited By