Improved Daily Spatial Precipitation Estimation by Merging Multi-Source Precipitation Data Based on the Geographically Weighted Regression Method: A Case Study of Taihu Lake Basin, China.

Yi Pan, Qiqi Yuan, Jinsong Ma, Lachun Wang
Author Information
  1. Yi Pan: School of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
  2. Qiqi Yuan: School of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
  3. Jinsong Ma: School of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
  4. Lachun Wang: School of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Abstract

Accurately estimating the spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation is crucial for hydrological modeling. However, precipitation products based on a single source have their advantages and disadvantages. How to effectively combine the advantages of different precipitation datasets has become an important topic in developing high-quality precipitation products internationally in recent years. This paper uses the measured precipitation data of Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) and in situ rainfall observation in the Taihu Lake Basin, as well as the longitude, latitude, elevation, slope, aspect, surface roughness, distance to the coastline, and land use and land cover data, and adopts a two-step method to achieve precipitation fusion: (1) downscaling the MSWEP source precipitation field using the bilinear interpolation method and (2) using the geographically weighted regression (GWR) method and tri-cube function weighting method to achieve fusion. Considering geographical and human activities factors, the spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation errors in MSWEP is detected. The fusion of MSWEP and gauge observation precipitation is realized. The results show that the method in this paper significantly improves the spatial resolution and accuracy of precipitation data in the Taihu Lake Basin.

Keywords

References

  1. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Feb;65:102627 [PMID: 33288993]
  2. Environ Pollut. 2021 Sep 1;284:117116 [PMID: 33915397]
  3. Nature. 2016 Jan 7;529(7584):84-7 [PMID: 26738594]
  4. Water Res. 2015 Nov 15;85:124-36 [PMID: 26311274]
  5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Jul;1472(1):49-75 [PMID: 32246848]
  6. Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7870):80-86 [PMID: 34349288]
  7. Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 23;11(1):3044 [PMID: 32576822]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 20;766:142591 [PMID: 33601670]
  9. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 21;7(1):17966 [PMID: 29269737]
  10. J Hazard Mater. 2012 Mar 30;209-210:48-58 [PMID: 22277338]
  11. Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Apr;141(4):671-86 [PMID: 22877498]

MeSH Term

Humans
Lakes
Spatial Regression
Environmental Monitoring
Hydrology
Agriculture
China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0precipitationMSWEPmethodspatialdataPrecipitationobservationTaihuLakeBasinfusiontemporaldistributionproductssourceadvantagespaperMulti-SourcelandachieveusinggeographicallyweightedregressiongaugeAccuratelyestimatingcrucialhydrologicalmodelingHoweverbasedsingledisadvantageseffectivelycombinedifferentdatasetsbecomeimportanttopicdevelopinghigh-qualityinternationallyrecentyearsusesmeasuredWeighted-Ensemblesiturainfallwelllongitudelatitudeelevationslopeaspectsurfaceroughnessdistancecoastlineusecoveradoptstwo-stepfusion:1downscalingfieldbilinearinterpolation2GWRtri-cubefunctionweightingConsideringgeographicalhumanactivitiesfactorserrorsdetectedrealizedresultsshowsignificantlyimprovesresolutionaccuracyImprovedDailySpatialEstimationMergingDataBasedGeographicallyWeightedRegressionMethod:CaseStudyChina

Similar Articles

Cited By