Analysis of the Face Mask Use by Public Transport Passengers and Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ekaterina A Shashina, Ekaterina A Sannikova, Denis V Shcherbakov, Yury V Zhernov, Valentina V Makarova, Tatiana S Isiutina-Fedotkova, Nadezhda N Zabroda, Elena V Belova, Nina A Ermakova, Tatiana M Khodykina, Anton Yu Skopin, Vitaly A Sukhov, Anna A Klimova, Tamara Nikolic Turnic, Irina I Yakushina, Olga A Manerova, Vladimir A Reshetnikov, Oleg V Mitrokhin
Author Information
  1. Ekaterina A Shashina: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  2. Ekaterina A Sannikova: National Medical Research Center for Urology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  3. Denis V Shcherbakov: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  4. Yury V Zhernov: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  5. Valentina V Makarova: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  6. Tatiana S Isiutina-Fedotkova: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
  7. Nadezhda N Zabroda: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
  8. Elena V Belova: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  9. Nina A Ermakova: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  10. Tatiana M Khodykina: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  11. Anton Yu Skopin: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
  12. Vitaly A Sukhov: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  13. Anna A Klimova: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  14. Tamara Nikolic Turnic: Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia. ORCID
  15. Irina I Yakushina: N.A. Semashko Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  16. Olga A Manerova: N.A. Semashko Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID
  17. Vladimir A Reshetnikov: N.A. Semashko Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
  18. Oleg V Mitrokhin: Department of General Hygiene, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia. ORCID

Abstract

(1) Background: The use of face masks and gloves in public places directly shows the commitment of the population to the established regulations. Public transport is one of the most-at-risk places of contamination. The aim of the study was to analyze the face mask use by public transport passengers and workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Methods: Public transport passengers and workers were surveyed. Periodic intermittent selective observation was used to gauge the level of adherence to the established regulations among public transport passengers. Factor analysis was used to identify factors determining the face-mask-wearing comfort. (3) Results: The majority of passengers (87.5%) and all transport workers (100%) used face masks and gloves. Most of the users wore only face masks. Only 41.6% of passengers and 74.7% of transport workers wore face masks correctly. Motivational attitudes at the implementation of preventive measures were determined: established regulations in the public place (55.8%) and the protection of one's own health and the health of family members (44.2%). Only 22.5% of those wearing face masks believed that doing so will have any effect on the spread of an infectious disease, and 10.8% wore masks to maintain the health of people around themselves. A low level of social responsibility was demonstrated. For 53.4% of workers, face mask wearing was uncomfortable. The majority of workers had adverse reactions to mask wearing: feeling short of breath (52.8%), hyperemia of face skin (33.8%), and facial hyperhidrosis (67.4%). (4) Conclusions: The comfort of wearing a mask is determined by adverse reactions occurrence, the properties of the mask, working conditions, and the duration of wearing the face mask. It is necessary to develop recommendations to reduce wearing discomfort. These recommendations, along with methods of raising the social responsibility of the population, can contribute to a greater commitment of the population to non-specific prevention measures.

Keywords

References

  1. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022 Jan;19(1):23-34 [PMID: 34747682]
  2. Occup Environ Med. 2022 Jun;79(6):403-411 [PMID: 35022260]
  3. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 14;15(8):e0237691 [PMID: 32797067]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;18(9): [PMID: 33925929]
  5. J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23:101279 [PMID: 34660200]
  6. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;35(2):121-6 [PMID: 24049221]
  7. Dermatitis. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;32(1):57-62 [PMID: 33449481]
  8. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100191 [PMID: 34173465]
  9. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2020 Sep;29(3):115-122 [PMID: 32975297]
  10. Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Sep 1;: [PMID: 36047478]
  11. Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14346 [PMID: 32985745]
  12. Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 12;9:661482 [PMID: 33777890]
  13. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634 [PMID: 32716896]
  14. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240785 [PMID: 33057375]
  15. Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:e18-e20 [PMID: 33349432]
  16. Multimed Tools Appl. 2022;81(23):33689-33714 [PMID: 35463219]
  17. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Dec;109(12):1522-1530 [PMID: 32632523]
  18. Dermatitis. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;32(2):78-85 [PMID: 33273243]
  19. Concurr Comput. 2022 Aug 30;34(19):e7041 [PMID: 35937498]
  20. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246317 [PMID: 33596207]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;22(1):469 [PMID: 35264136]
  22. J Transp Geogr. 2021 Feb;91:102954 [PMID: 33456211]
  23. Math Biosci. 2020 Jul;325:108364 [PMID: 32360770]
  24. Dermatol Ther. 2020 Jul;33(4):e13567 [PMID: 32410275]
  25. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 18;15(11):e0242476 [PMID: 33206721]
  26. Public Health. 2022 Apr;205:e21-e22 [PMID: 35232577]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49): [PMID: 34857639]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 12;17(18): [PMID: 32932652]
  29. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jun 22;58(7): [PMID: 35888557]
  30. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e23231 [PMID: 33539309]
  31. Br J Sports Med. 2022 Jan;56(2):107-113 [PMID: 33849908]
  32. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Aug 19;71(33):1052-1056 [PMID: 35980867]
  33. Phys Fluids (1994). 2021 Jul;33(7):073315 [PMID: 34335009]
  34. Global Health. 2018 Dec 4;14(1):122 [PMID: 30514342]
  35. Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221096285 [PMID: 35485919]
  36. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 May 28;100(10):adv00152 [PMID: 32449781]
  37. J Med Ethics. 2007 Aug;33(8):444-5 [PMID: 17664299]
  38. J Community Health. 2021 Dec;46(6):1226-1235 [PMID: 34156593]
  39. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;42(2):247-248 [PMID: 32381129]
  40. Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Nov;34(8):1184-98 [PMID: 22443378]
  41. PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0268043 [PMID: 35511962]
  42. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 25;19(1): [PMID: 35010484]
  43. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23): [PMID: 34886181]

MeSH Term

Humans
Masks
COVID-19
Pandemics
Transportation
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0facemasktransportworkersmaskspassengerswearingpublic8%populationestablishedregulationsPublicusedworehealthsocialresponsibilityadversereactionsuseglovesplacescommitmentCOVID-19levelcomfortmajority5%attitudesmeasures4%recommendations1Background:directlyshowsonemost-at-riskcontaminationaimstudyanalyzepandemic2Methods:surveyedPeriodicintermittentselectiveobservationgaugeadherenceamongFactoranalysisidentifyfactorsdeterminingface-mask-wearing3Results:87100%users416%747%correctlyMotivationalimplementationpreventivedetermined:place55protectionone'sfamilymembers442%22believedwilleffectspreadinfectiousdisease10maintainpeoplearoundlowdemonstrated53uncomfortablewearing:feelingshortbreath52hyperemiaskin33facialhyperhidrosis674Conclusions:determinedoccurrencepropertiesworkingconditionsdurationnecessarydevelopreducediscomfortalongmethodsraisingcancontributegreaternon-specificpreventionAnalysisFaceMaskUseTransportPassengersWorkersPandemicmotivational

Similar Articles

Cited By