How does financial development reduce carbon emissions: evidence from BRI countries.

Chunyan Liu, Jun Xu, Jun Zhao
Author Information
  1. Chunyan Liu: School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, China.
  2. Jun Xu: School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, China. 709579412@qq.com.
  3. Jun Zhao: School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, China.

Abstract

Low-carbon development in BRI countries is crucial to the global response to climate change. As an important factor in promoting economic growth, financial development has a great impact on BRI countries' carbon emissions. This paper applies the panel data of 43 BRI countries for the period 1997-2019 to investigate the influence of financial development on carbon emissions. The two-tier stochastic Frontier model is employed to decompose the restraining and rebounding effects of financial development. The results show that financial development has both restraining and rebounding effects on carbon emissions, and the rebounding effect is less than the restraining effect, resulting in a positive net effect. The average restraining effect is 0.165, and the average rebounding effect is 0.018, causing the net effect of financial development on carbon emissions to have an average value of 0.147. The restraining effect decreases year by year, implying there is a blocking point to release the restraining effect. Moreover, technological progress strengthens the restraining effect, while the increase in energy consumption weakens the restraining effect. The findings indicate that excavating the restraining effect of financial development, promoting technological progress, and reducing fossil energy consumption is crucial to promoting the low-carbon development of BRI countries.

Keywords

References

  1. Acheampong AO (2019) Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality? Energ Econ 83:156–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.025 [DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.025]
  2. Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Raza MY (2020) Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(19):23586–23601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7]
  3. Ahmad M, Ahmed Z, Yang XY, Hussain N, Sinha A (2022) Financial development and environmental degradation: do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Res 105:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GR.2021.09.012 [DOI: 10.1016/J.GR.2021.09.012]
  4. Alam MM, Murad MW, Nornanc AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic 70(SI):466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043 [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043]
  5. Amin A, Ameer W, Yousaf H, Akbar M (2022) Financial development, institutional quality, and the influence of various environmental factors on carbon dioxide emissions: exploring the nexus in China. Front Environ Sci 9:838714. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENVS.2021.838714 [DOI: 10.3389/FENVS.2021.838714]
  6. Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.005 [DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.005]
  7. Chen SQ, Liu Z, Chen B, Zhu FY, Fath BD, Liang S, Su MR, Yang J (2019) Dynamic carbon emission linkages across boundaries. Earths Future 7(2):197–209. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000811 [DOI: 10.1029/2018EF000811]
  8. Chen Y, Liu S, Wu H, Zhang X, Zhou Q (2020) How can belt and road countries contribute to global low-carbon development? J Clean Prod 256:120717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120717 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120717]
  9. Chen ZC, Paudel KP, Zheng RQ (2021) Pollution halo or pollution haven: assessing the role of foreign direct investment on energy conservation and emission reduction. J Environ Plann Man:1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1882965
  10. Dar JA, Asif M (2017) Is financial development good for carbon mitigation in India? A regime shift-based cointegration analysis. Carbon Manag 8(5–6):435–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1396841 [DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2017.1396841]
  11. Dumitresce EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 [DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014]
  12. Fan JL, Da YB, Wan SL, Zhang M, Cao Z, Wang Y, Zhang X (2019) Determinants of carbon emissions in “Belt and Road Initiative” countries: a production technology perspective. Appl Energ 239:268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.201 [DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.201]
  13. Fang Z, Gao X, Sun CW (2020) Do financial development, urbanization and trade affect environmental quality? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 259:120892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120892 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120892]
  14. Gill AR, Hassan S, Haseeb M (2019) Moderating role of financial development in environmental Kuznets: a case study of Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26(33SI):34468–34478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06565-1 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06565-1]
  15. Gu W, Chu ZZ, Wang C (2020) How do different types of energy technological progress affect regional carbon intensity? A spatial panel approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(35SI):44494–44509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10327-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10327-9]
  16. Gu BB, Chen F, Zhang K (2021) The policy effect of green finance in promoting industrial transformation and upgrading efficiency in China: analysis from the perspective of government regulation and public environmental demands. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28(34):47474–47491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13944-0 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13944-0]
  17. Guo MY, Hu YF (2020) The impact of financial development on carbon emission: evidence from China. Sustainability 12(17):6959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176959 [DOI: 10.3390/su12176959]
  18. Hafeez M, Chunhui Y, Strohmaier D, Ahmed M, Jie L (2018) Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(10SI):9579–9592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1317-7 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1317-7]
  19. Jiang C, Ma XX (2019) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: a global perspective. Sustainability 11(19):5241. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195241 [DOI: 10.3390/su11195241]
  20. Kahouli B (2017) The short and long run causality relationship among economic growth, energy consumption and financial development: evidence from South Mediterranean Countries (SMCs). Energ Econ 68:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.013 [DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.013]
  21. Khan M, Ozturk I (2021) Examining the direct and indirect effects of financial development on CO2 emissions for 88 developing countries. J Enviro Manage 293:112812. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.112812 [DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.112812]
  22. Khan AN, En X, Raza MY, Khan NA, Ali A (2020) Sectorial study of technological progress and CO2 emission: insights from a developing economy. Technol Forecast Soc 151:119862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119862 [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119862]
  23. Kumbhakar S, Parmeter C (2009) The effects of match uncertainty and bargaining on labor market outcomes: evidence from firm and worker specific estimates. J Product Anal 31(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0117-3 [DOI: 10.1007/s11123-008-0117-3]
  24. Kumbhakar S, Lovell K (2000) Stochastic Frontier analysis: an econometric approach. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233765662_Stochastic_Frontier_Analysis_An_Econometric_Approach
  25. Lee KH, Min B (2015) Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod 108(A):534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114]
  26. Li PY, Qian H, Zhou WF (2017) Finding harmony between the environment and humanity: an introduction to the thematic issue of the Silk Road. Environ Earth Sci 76:1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6428-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s12665-017-6428-9]
  27. Li JL, Liu HX, Du KR (2019) Does market-oriented reform increase energy rebound effect? Evidence from China’s regional development. China Econ Rev 56:101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.101304 [DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.101304]
  28. Linnenluecke MK, Smith T, McKnight B (2016) Environmental finance: a research agenda for interdisciplinary finance research. Econ Model 59:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.07.010 [DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.07.010]
  29. Liu YY, Hao Y (2018) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic development in the countries along “The Belt and Road.” Sci Total Environ 645:674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.062 [DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.062]
  30. Liu HY, Song YR (2020) Financial development and carbon emissions in China since the recent world financial crisis: evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a spatial Durbin model. Sci Total Environ 715:136771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136771 [DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136771]
  31. Liu Y, Yao XL, Wei TY (2019) Energy efficiency gap and target setting: a study of information asymmetry between governments and industries in China. China Econ Rev 57(C):101341–101341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101341 [DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101341]
  32. Liu HY, Wang YL, Jiang J, Wu P (2020) How green is the “Belt and Road Initiative” -evidence from Chinese OFDI in the energy sector. Energy Pol 145:111709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111709 [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111709]
  33. Mahalik MK, Babu MS, Loganathan N, Shahbaz M (2017) Does financial development intensify energy consumption in Saudi Arabia? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:1022–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.081 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.081]
  34. Muhammad S, Long XL, Salman M, Dauda L (2020) Effect of urbanization and international trade on CO2 emissions across 65 Belt and Road Initiative countries. Energy 196:117102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117102 [DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117102]
  35. Nurgazina Z, Ullah A, Ali U, Koondhar MA, Lu Q (2021) The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28(42):60195–60208. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-14930-2 [DOI: 10.1007/S11356-021-14930-2]
  36. Ohlan R (2015) The impact of population density, energy consumption, economic growth and trade openness on CO2 emissions in India. Nat Hazards 79(2):1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1898-0 [DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1898-0]
  37. Parmeter CF (2018) Estimation of the two-tiered stochastic frontier model with the scaling property J. Product Anal 49:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-017-0520-8 [DOI: 10.1007/s11123-017-0520-8]
  38. Pham L (2019) Does financial development matter for innovation in renewable energy? Appl Econ Lett 26(21):1756–1761. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1593934 [DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2019.1593934]
  39. Polachek SW, Yoon BJ (1987) A two-tiered earnings Frontier estimation of employer and employee information in the labor market. Rev Econ Stat 69(2):296–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927237 [DOI: 10.2307/1927237]
  40. Rani T, Amjad MA, Asghar N, Rehman HU (2022) Revisiting the environmental impact of financial development on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from South Asian economies. Clean Technol Environ Policy :1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10098-022-02360-8
  41. Rauf A, Liu XX, Amin W, Ozturk I, Rehman OU, Hafeez M (2018) Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from Belt and Road Initiative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(32):32066–32080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3052-5]
  42. Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518]
  43. Scholtens B (2006) Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 68(1):19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9037-1 [DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9037-1]
  44. Schwerhoff G, Sy M (2017) Financing renewable energy in Africa - key challenge of the sustainable development goals. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.004 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.004]
  45. Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037 [DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.06.037]
  46. Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Hille E, Mahalik MK (2020) UK’s net-zero carbon emissions target: investigating the potential role of economic growth, financial development, and R&D expenditures based on historical data (1870–2017). Technol Forecast Soc 161:120255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120255 [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120255]
  47. Shahzad SJH, Kumar RR, Zakaria M, Hurr M (2017) Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.042 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.042]
  48. Shearz M, Xu DY, Sinha A, Mumtaz MZ, Fatima N (2022) The dynamic nexus among financial development, renewable energy and carbon emissions: moderating roles of globalization and institutional quality across BRI countries. J Clean Prod 343:130995. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.130995 [DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.130995]
  49. Shen YJ, Su ZW, Malik MY, Umar M, Khan ZS, Khan M (2021) Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China. Sci Total Environ 755(2):142538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538 [DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538]
  50. Shujah-ur-Rahman CSS, Saleem N, Bari MW (2019) Financial development and its moderating role in environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:19305–19319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05290-z [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05290-z]
  51. Su YQ, Liu X, Ji JP, Ma XM (2020) Role of economic structural change in the peaking of China's CO2 emissions: an input-output optimization model. Sci Total Environ:143306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143306
  52. Sun W, Huang CC (2020) How does urbanization affect carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China J Clean Prod 272:122828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122828 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122828]
  53. Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Pol 37(1):246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025]
  54. Wang HJ, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J Product Anal 18(2):129–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016565719882 [DOI: 10.1023/A]
  55. Wu R, Geng Y, Dong HJ, Fujita T, Tian X (2016) Changes of CO2 emissions embodied in China-Japan trade: drivers and implications. J Clean Prod 112(5):4151–4158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.017 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.017]
  56. Yang GF, Sun T, Wang JL, Li XN (2015) Modeling the nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth. Energy Pol 86:104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.031 [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.031]
  57. Yao SJ, Zhang S (2021) Energy mix, financial development, and carbon emissions in China: a directed technical change perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28(44):62959–62974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15186-6 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15186-6]
  58. Yu YT, Zhang N, Kim JD (2020) Impact of urbanization on energy demand: an empirical study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. Energy Pol 139:111354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111354 [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111354]
  59. Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou FJ (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210]
  60. Zaman K, Moemen MAE (2017) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic development: evaluating alternative and plausible environmental hypothesis for sustainable growth. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.072 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.072]
  61. Zhang YJ (2011) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Pol 39(4):2197–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.026 [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.026]
  62. Zhang XP, Zhang HN, Zhao CH, Yuan JH (2019) Carbon emission intensity of electricity generation in Belt and Road Initiative countries: a benchmarking analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26(15SI):15057–15068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04860-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04860-5]
  63. Zhao ZB, Shi XP, Zhao LD, Zhang JG (2020) Extending production-theoretical decomposition analysis to environmentally sensitive growth: case study of Belt and Road Initiative countries. Technol Forecast Soc 161:120289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120289 [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120289]
  64. Zhou YY, Fang ZQ, Li N, Wu XY, Du YH, Liu ZH (2019) How does financial development affect reductions in carbon emissions in high-energy industries?-A perspective on technological progress. Int J Env Res Pub He 16:301817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173018 [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173018]

Grants

  1. 21ZD133/the Major Project of National Social Science Fund of China
  2. 71964032/Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. SL2022001/"Silk Road"Innovation Fund Project of Xinjiang University

MeSH Term

Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Technology
Economic Development
Investments

Chemicals

Carbon
Carbon Dioxide

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effectdevelopmentrestrainingfinancialBRIcountriescarbonemissionsreboundingpromotingaverage0progressconsumptioncrucialstochasticFrontiermodeleffectsnetyeartechnologicalenergyLow-carbonglobalresponseclimatechangeimportantfactoreconomicgrowthgreatimpactcountries'paperappliespaneldata43period1997-2019investigateinfluencetwo-tieremployeddecomposeresultsshowlessresultingpositive165018causingvalue147decreasesimplyingblockingpointreleaseMoreoverstrengthensincreaseweakensfindingsindicateexcavatingreducingfossillow-carbonreduceemissions:evidenceCarbonEnergyFinancialTechnologicalTwo-tier

Similar Articles

Cited By