A consumer wearable device for tracking sleep respiratory events.

Pasquale Tondo, Francesco Dell'Olio, Donato Lacedonia, Roberto Sabato, Rosa Leccisotti, Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro, Giulia Scioscia
Author Information
  1. Pasquale Tondo: Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Viale Luigi Pinto, 1 - 71122, Foggia, Italy. pasquale.tondo@unifg.it. ORCID
  2. Francesco Dell'Olio: Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125, Bari, Italy.
  3. Donato Lacedonia: Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Viale Luigi Pinto, 1 - 71122, Foggia, Italy.
  4. Roberto Sabato: Respiratory and Intermediate Care Unit, "Policlinico Foggia" University Hospital, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
  5. Rosa Leccisotti: Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Viale Luigi Pinto, 1 - 71122, Foggia, Italy.
  6. Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro: Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Viale Luigi Pinto, 1 - 71122, Foggia, Italy.
  7. Giulia Scioscia: Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Viale Luigi Pinto, 1 - 71122, Foggia, Italy.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is instrument, operator, and time-dependent and therefore requires long waiting times. In recent decades, technological development has produced useful devices to monitor the health status of the population, including sleep. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate a wearable device (WD) in a group of individuals at high risk of OSA.
METHODS: The study was conducted on consecutive subjects with high risk of OSA assessed by sleep questionnaires and clinical evaluation. All subjects performed cardio-respiratory monitoring (CRM) and WD simultaneously on a single night, after which the parameters of the two sleep investigations were compared.
RESULTS: Of 20 individuals enrolled, 60% were men and mean age was 57.3 ± 10.7 years. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) for the CRM was 23.1 ± 19.6 events·h while it was 10.3 ± 8.3 events·h for the WD. Correlation analysis between the results of the two investigations showed r = 0.19 (p = 0.40) for AHI and r = 0.4076 (p = 0.07) for sO2%. The accuracy for different stages of OSA severity was 70% in OSA cases and 60% in moderate to severe cases with sensitivity and specificity varying a great deal.
CONCLUSION: Small and low-cost devices may prove to be a valuable resource to reduce costs and waiting times for a sleep investigation in suspected OSA. However, diagnosis of sleep apnea requires valid and reliable instruments, so validation tests are necessary before a device can be commercialized.

Keywords

References

  1. Tondo P, Fanfulla F, Sabato R, Scioscia G, Foschino Barbaro MP, Lacedonia D. (2022) Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS): state of the art. Minerva Med. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.22.08190-3 .
  2. Heinzer R, Vat S, Marques-Vidal P, Marti-Soler H, Andries D, Tobback N, Mooser V, Preisig M, Malhotra A, Waeber G, Vollenweider P, Tafti M, Haba-Rubio J (2015) Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypnoLaus study. Lancet Respir Med 3(4):310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00043-0 [DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00043-0]
  3. Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, Kuhlmann DC, Mehra R, Ramar K, Harrod CG (2017) Clinical practice guideline for diagnostic testing for adult obstructive sleep apnea: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Clin Sleep Med 13(3):479–504. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.6506 [DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6506]
  4. Tondo P, Drigo R, Scioscia G, Ballarin A, Rossi E, Floriani AF, Pauletti A, FoschinoBarbaro MP, Lacedonia D (2021) Usefulness of sleep events detection using a wrist worn peripheral arterial tone signal device (WatchPAT™) in a population at low risk of obstructive sleep apnea. J Sleep Res 30(6):e13352. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13352 [DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13352]
  5. Depner CM, Cheng PC, Devine JK, Khosla S, de Zambotti M, Robillard R, Vakulin A, Drummond SPA. (2020) Wearable technologies for developing sleep and circadian biomarkers: a summary of workshop discussions. Sleep 13;43(2):zsz254. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsz254 .
  6. Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo C, Harding SM, Lloyd RM, Quan SF, Troester MT, Vaughn BV (2017) AASM scoring manual updates for 2017 (version 2.4). J Clin Sleep Med 13(5):665–666. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.6576 [DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6576]
  7. Faßbender P, Haddad A, Bürgener S et al (2019) Validation of a photoplethysmography device for detection of obstructive sleep apnea in the perioperative setting. J Clin Monit Comput 33:341–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0151-2 [DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0151-2]
  8. Hayano J, Yamamoto H, Nonaka I, Komazawa M, Itao K, et al. (2020) Quantitative detection of sleep apnea with wearable watch device. PLOS One 15 (11): e0237279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237279
  9. Chen Y, Wang W, Guo Y, Zhang H, Chen Y, Xie L (2021) A single-center validation of the accuracy of a photoplethysmography-based smartwatch for screening obstructive sleep apnea. Nat Sci Sleep 16(13):1533–1544. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S323286 [DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S323286]
  10. Papini GB, Fonseca P, van Gilst MM, Bergmans JWM, Vullings R, Overeem S (2020) Wearable monitoring of sleep-disordered breathing: estimation of the apnea-hypopnea index using wrist-worn reflective photoplethysmography. Sci Rep 10(1):13512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69935-7 [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69935-7]

MeSH Term

Male
Humans
Middle Aged
Aged
Female
Polysomnography
Sleep
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Sensitivity and Specificity
Wearable Electronic Devices

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sleepOSAdeviceapneaWDdiagnosisrequireswaitingtimesdevicesstudywearableindividualshighrisksubjectsmonitoringCRMtwo60%10AHIevents·hr = 0p = 0casesPURPOSE:obstructiveinstrumentoperatortime-dependentthereforelongrecentdecadestechnologicaldevelopmentproducedusefulmonitorhealthstatuspopulationincludingThereforeaimevaluategroupMETHODS:conductedconsecutiveassessedquestionnairesclinicalevaluationperformedcardio-respiratorysimultaneouslysinglenightparametersinvestigationscomparedRESULTS:20enrolledmenmeanage573 ±7years Theapnea-hypopneaindex231 ± 1963 ± 83Correlationanalysis betweenresultsinvestigations showed1940407607sO2%accuracydifferentstagesseverity was70%moderate to severesensitivityspecificityvaryinggreatdealCONCLUSION:Smalllow-costmayprovevaluableresourcereducecostsinvestigationsuspectedHoweverof sleepvalidreliableinstrumentsvalidationtestsnecessarycancommercializedconsumertrackingrespiratoryeventsCardiorespiratoryPolysomnographySleepTechnologyWearable

Similar Articles

Cited By