Feeling low and unhappy together? An actor-partner-interdependence model uncovering the linkage between different operationalizations of relationship quality and depression in different-sex couples.

Corina Aguilar-Raab, Friederike Winter, Marc N Jarczok, Beate Ditzen, Marco Warth
Author Information
  1. Corina Aguilar-Raab: Institute for Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. ORCID
  2. Friederike Winter: Institute for Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. ORCID
  3. Marc N Jarczok: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Clinic Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  4. Beate Ditzen: Institute for Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. ORCID
  5. Marco Warth: Institute for Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Abstract

Some studies suggest a bi-directional association between low relationship quality and depression. However, the social impact of depression and the potential preventative effects of healthy relationships are not yet sufficiently understood, as studies have shown heterogenous results for effects in both directions. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to differentiate the actor and partner effects of this association more comprehensively using two measures to capture characteristics of relationship quality-firstly regarding general aspects of social system quality and secondly considering specific aspects of the romantic relationship. 110 different-sex couples were included, being separated in partners with highly pronounced depressive symptoms in women (Cw/DW) versus partners with low depressive symptoms (LDCs). We investigated effects cross-sectionally using multi-group analyses to predict relationship (couple specific questionnaire: PFB) versus system quality (general system quality questionnaire: EVOS) in a step-by-step approach, modelling actor and partner effects with variation within and across both groups and then comparing the results to models with equal actor and partner effects. Depression was measured with the PHQ-9. With regard to the relationship between depressive symptoms and system quality, the model that constrained actor and partner effects to be equal across both groups was preferred and showed negative significant actor effects across gender and groups. Concerning the association between depressive symptoms and relationship quality, the model constraining actor and partner effects to be equal within groups had the best fit to the data and revealed a negative partner effect in LDCs. Conclusions Controlling for the moderating variable of clinically relevant depressive symptoms, we found evidence for actor and partner effects, which differed between the two relationship measures. This underlines the importance to reflect how relationship quality is operationalized. The negative partner effect on relationship quality in LDCs emphasizes that even in a non-clinical context, depressive symptoms negatively impact the perceived relationship quality of both women and men. This suggests that addressing the relationship is important in non-clinical preventive contexts and calls for integrating the partner into counselling or trainings.

References

  1. J Psychol. 2016 Oct 2;150(7):897-915 [PMID: 27537057]
  2. J Fam Psychol. 2019 Oct;33(7):819-829 [PMID: 31094543]
  3. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jul;42(7):923-40 [PMID: 27287752]
  4. J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:268-275 [PMID: 29499510]
  5. Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1033-41 [PMID: 21737574]
  6. Innov Aging. 2017 Nov;1(3):igx025 [PMID: 29795792]
  7. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Nov;49:106-118 [PMID: 27664823]
  8. Psychol Bull. 2017 Aug;143(8):783-822 [PMID: 28447828]
  9. Couple Family Psychol. 2013 Mar;2(1):1-13 [PMID: 25032063]
  10. PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316 [PMID: 20668659]
  11. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:28-46 [PMID: 26295276]
  12. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:313-32 [PMID: 27395342]
  13. BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 4;8(9):e020448 [PMID: 30287601]
  14. J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):280-293 [PMID: 30742462]
  15. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 May;109(2):345-51 [PMID: 10895574]
  16. Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):140-187 [PMID: 23527470]
  17. J Affect Disord. 2004 Apr;79(1-3):71-9 [PMID: 15023482]
  18. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):830-8 [PMID: 15482041]
  19. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2017 Jun;4(2):241-250 [PMID: 29805985]
  20. J Marital Fam Ther. 1993 Oct;19(4):355-68 [PMID: 21118474]
  21. Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):672-4 [PMID: 23850430]
  22. J Health Psychol. 2019 Oct;24(12):1744-1755 [PMID: 28810439]
  23. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;26(5):464-7 [PMID: 23867661]
  24. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Nov;117(4):762-75 [PMID: 19025224]
  25. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 30;11:701 [PMID: 32848903]
  26. Psychol Aging. 2009 Mar;24(1):184-9 [PMID: 19290750]
  27. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0133442 [PMID: 26200357]
  28. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 25;18(1):310 [PMID: 30253779]
  29. J Marital Fam Ther. 2022 Oct;48(4):1111-1127 [PMID: 35253231]
  30. Fam Process. 2021 Jun;60(2):493-506 [PMID: 32599646]
  31. Nervenarzt. 2019 Nov;90(11):1177-1186 [PMID: 30719537]
  32. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jan;25(1):61-70 [PMID: 22835874]
  33. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jun 15;271:239-247 [PMID: 32479322]
  34. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Jun;32(5):565-74 [PMID: 17499441]
  35. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  36. Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):3-34 [PMID: 7644604]
  37. J Affect Disord. 2013 Aug 15;150(1):1-16 [PMID: 23668900]

MeSH Term

Male
Humans
Female
Depression
Cross-Sectional Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interpersonal Relations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0relationshipqualityeffectspartneractordepressivesymptomssystemgroupsassociationlowdepressionLDCsacrossequalmodelnegativestudiessocialimpactresultsusingtwomeasuresgeneralaspectsspecificdifferent-sexcouplespartnerswomenversusquestionnaire:withineffectnon-clinicalsuggestbi-directionalHoweverpotentialpreventativehealthyrelationshipsyetsufficientlyunderstoodshownheterogenousdirectionsThereforemainaimstudydifferentiatecomprehensivelycapturecharacteristicsquality-firstlyregardingsecondlyconsideringromantic110includedseparatedhighlypronouncedCw/DWinvestigatedcross-sectionallymulti-groupanalysespredictcouplePFBEVOSstep-by-stepapproachmodellingvariationcomparingmodelsDepressionmeasuredPHQ-9regardconstrainedpreferredshowedsignificantgenderConcerningconstrainingbestfitdatarevealedConclusionsControllingmoderatingvariableclinicallyrelevantfoundevidencedifferedunderlinesimportancereflectoperationalizedemphasizesevencontextnegativelyperceivedmensuggestsaddressingimportantpreventivecontextscallsintegratingcounsellingtrainingsFeelingunhappytogether?actor-partner-interdependenceuncoveringlinkagedifferentoperationalizations

Similar Articles

Cited By